Was Jesus transgender?

a reply to: Specimen

Actually the Celts wrote a lot down. Just not their spiritual path (very much). But there are a lot of extant sources on there Gods. I'm a Gaelic and Gaulish focoused pagan, so I know a little bit about this

originally posted by: JoshuaCox

originally posted by: ketsuko
No more than Jesus was a socialist.

Jesus was definately a socialist...

Give up to ceaser what is ceaser's (pay your taxes)

What a way to misinterpret a message!

The coin was Caesar's, it doesnt mean anything, and shouldn't to those who belong to the kingdom of God(like the coins are to Rome) ...not because he agreed that its a great system for equality in society, and he thought that the taxes would go to great social programs, like college and abortions for example.

Rome also had slaves;, you cant have slaves if everyone is a slave by another name!

The point was that its not yours and its not there for your benefit, rather only to Caesar's... so let it all go.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

"There and back again by Bilbo Baggins"

Pssh! Pics or it didnt happen! Red dragons are impossible, everyone knows dragons are only green

a reply to: TerryDon79

That’s a pretty long winded way to ultimately say “I dunno”.

Lengthy? Yes it was but it was truly in reply to your asking for my opinion. If that taxed your mental capacity you should have set requirements of the length of a reply such as "I dunno."

Or perhaps a very intelligent post such as --

" That would mean that this jebus person who have no Male human dna. Therefore, this supposed jesus person would be a woman. This jebus person supposedly hung around with many guys and acting like one, even though, if jevus was real, she would be a she.

A female walking around as Male. Hmmm. Sounds like the typical transgender Male to me. "

Hummmmm -- I dunno --------------------

a reply to: TerryDon79

Poor TerryDon Jesus Christ is a man who us the fullness of the godhead bodily, who will judge both you and Noiden to Hell for all eternity. But don't fret your little head over it, it is just a fair tale remember.

a reply to: ChesterJohn

Oh chester. I knew you couldn’t resist coming back AND with your idle threats.

How about this? Stick to the topic and stop with your xtian anger.

a reply to: Specimen

That still does not prove that Angles have wings and flew. NOT one reference in the Bible concerning angles ever says they are females and they have wings. they are always depicted as a man and never said to fly or have any wings.

yes as Satan he is said to walk but a Lucifer he is said to be a Cherub, which does have wings (see Ezk 1 and 10). And that Satan makes himself an angel of light. Always a man like Jesus Christ and the angles are.

The only reason for so many Jesus is transgender stories out their is because many men want to feel good about cross dressing and ACTING like woman, they are called effeminate in the Bible. Nothing new under the Sun.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Well if you want to know I was asked to look.

originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: TerryDon79

Well if you want to know I was asked to look.

Of course you were. Just like you were going to leave the thread?

So, thoughts on the actual topic of the thread?

a reply to: ChesterJohn

And back to the threats. In essence ad hominem attacks, as opposed to discussing the OP. Tell you what prove you are correct and I'll consider it.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Jesus would have been a composite of male and female, not necessarily a hermaphrodite but a composite at the DNA level.

Paul stated that the sacrifice of Jesus atoned the sin of all people. If he was just male then his sacrifice would only cover the sin of men, not women. Both Adam and Eve sinned so you would need a perfect man and woman to cover everybody's sin.

Before Eve was created Adam was in the composite state of both sexes. That is why God took a rib of Adam to build the body of Eve. I assume Jesus was made up of the DNA structure that Adam had before Eve came out of him.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
With all the transgender posts going on at the moment, I decided to google "was Jesus transgender?"

I was surprised at how many results turned up!

My favourite (Link to source) basically says that Jesus, being son of God, had no gender before conception. God also has no gender. Therefore, Jesus must be transgender.

But is transgender really the right word? Would Jesus actually have been agender? (That means without gender)

But if he was agender, why would he be depicted as a male? That means that transgender would fit Jesus better than being agender.

What are your thoughts?

John 9:35  ... Dost thou believe on the Son of God?