It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
Like a broken record.
We are not a Democracy. We are a Democratic Republic.
Majority DOES NOT rule.
Bill of Rights, 1 has the same clout as a million when it comes to Equal Treatment/Equal Rights.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Pyrrho
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: awareness10
I got a better idea. We should have a bathroom separate from the rest with a sign "Bigots only"... for the bigot crowd. NOW the problem is solved for everyone.
Gotta love when someone has to pull out the bigot/sexist/racist/etc line to stop any speech that doesn't agree with their opinion or agenda.
Nice tone you're setting for the future discussion the country needs to have about these issues.
What would you call those who use laws for discrimination?
But they don't want to. Why do you want to impose your views on them?
originally posted by: Pyrrho
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Pyrrho
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: awareness10
I got a better idea. We should have a bathroom separate from the rest with a sign "Bigots only"... for the bigot crowd. NOW the problem is solved for everyone.
Gotta love when someone has to pull out the bigot/sexist/racist/etc line to stop any speech that doesn't agree with their opinion or agenda.
Nice tone you're setting for the future discussion the country needs to have about these issues.
What would you call those who use laws for discrimination?
So you want to abolish the 1st amendment? Got it.
Without conversation, we will get nowhere. And that is why we still have crippling race issues in this country.
originally posted by: Phage
I'm not imposing my views on them. I'm saying that they are not in a position to require special accommodation. But it looks like they'll be fine at the airport.
I'm not sure Furries have identity disorders (any more than SCA members do) but, no, I'm not saying they don't have rights. I'm saying that they are not in a position to require special accommodations. If a restaurant wants to provide catboxes, they can.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
originally posted by: Phage
I'm not imposing my views on them. I'm saying that they are not in a position to require special accommodation. But it looks like they'll be fine at the airport.
Why not? You are saying furry people, and other people with identity disorders don't have rights of their own?
No. I'm saying that they are not in a position to require special accommodation. Transgenders do not require special accommodations.
So, you only want people to conform to your own views. That's what you are saying.
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
a reply to: Phage
You are still saying that your views are more important than those of other people with completely different species identities.
Your source says otherwise.
BTW Phage...yes, many furry people do have identity disorders.
www.academia.edu...
There are a myriad of reasons why furry participants at a furry conference might identify as “less than 100% human,” not the least having a hangover from furry drinks the night before. Shari Caudron quotes Mark, a furry, who says: “In so much of society, there are so many layers of bull#. It’s hard to be yourself. But the whole fursona thing is really cool. It strips away human reluctance in many forms” (Caudron, 2006, p. 190). Tigerden.com includes other voices on furry “lifestylers” who reflect critically on being “human.”
Significantly, Gerbasi et al. take the trouble to define what they mean by “furries” but not what they mean by “human,” and so phrases like “objectively human” and “100% human” remain a priori assumptions.
originally posted by: Phage
No. My views are just as important as theirs are.
originally posted by: Phage
However, since they are not disabled, there is no requirement that they be provided with any particular accommodation. They are physically able to use existing facilities.
Associate Professor, Biological Sciences, Kent State University, 44720, Stark, N. Canton, OH, USA
Society and Animals (Impact Factor: 0.7). 08/2008; 16(3):197-222. DOI: 10.1163/156853008X323376
ABSTRACT
This study explored the furry identity. Furries are humans interested in anthropomorphic art and cartoons. Some furries have zoomorphic tendencies. Furries often identify with, and/or assume, characteristics of a special/totem species of nonhuman animal. This research surveyed both fur-ries (n = 217) and non-furry individuals (n = 29) attending a furry convention and a comparison group of college students (n = 68). Furries commonly indicated dragons and various canine and feline species as their alternate-species identity; none reported a nonhuman-primate identity. Dichotomous responses ("yes" or "no") to two key furry-identity questions ("do you consider yourself to be less than 100% human" and "if you could become 0% human, would you") pro-duced a two-by-two furry typology. Th ese two independent dimensions are self-perception (undistorted versus distorted) and species identity (attained versus unattained). One-quarter of the furry sample answered "yes" to both questions, placing them in the "Distorted Unattained" quadrant. This type of furry has certain characteristics paralleling gender-identity disorder. To explore this parallel, the furry typology, and the proposed construct of "Species Identity Disorder" needs further research.
Getting Disability Benefits Because of a Dissociative Disorder
Social Security disability benefits are sometimes allowed for long-term dissociative disorder.
...
Species dysphoria
Species dysphoria is the experience of dysphoria, sometimes including Clinical lycanthropy (delusion or hallucination of one's self as an animal) and dysmorphia (excessive concern over one's body image), associated with the feeling that one's body is of the wrong species.[1] Earls and Lalumière (2009) describe it as "the sense of being in the wrong (species) body... a desire to be an animal".[2] Outside of psychological literature, the term is common within the otherkin and therian communities.[3] The phenomenon is sometimes experienced in the context of sexual arousal to the image of one's self as an animal.
...
Gender dysphoria
Gender dysphoria or gender identity disorder (GID) is the experience of dysphoria (distress) related to the sex and gender a person was assigned at birth. Evidence suggests that people who identify with a gender different from the one they were assigned at birth may do so not just due to psychological or behavioral causes, but also biological ones related to their genetics, the makeup of their brains,[1] or prenatal exposure to hormones.
...
originally posted by: ElectricUniverse
So, in your view they have to be disabled in order to have rights?
So, in your view they have to be disabled in order to have rights?
And the first link you provided was a critique of the one you just did. The first link you posted says that comparing Furries to gender dysphoria is invalid.
Identity disorder, or in this case "Species Identity Disorder" is a disability.
Discrimination based on gender is unlawful.
So, just one type of dysphoria have the right to impose their will on the rest of the population but others don't?
I just proved they are disabled Phage
originally posted by: Annee
Right.
Special because of the practical necessity to fit a wheelchair.