It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Right now I am totally in awe as what our country has become since this president has been in power.
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
While this needs to be takken serious, I think the innugration will not be a target. I just don't get that feeling.
Maybe something else that same day
Originally posted by marg6043
Right now I am totally in awe as what our country has become since this president has been in power.
Originally posted by TrickmastertricK
My Opinion:
Cancel the "Extravaganza". Have a little party in the White House, save some tax-payer money, and Don't make yourself an open target.
Originally posted by marg6043
muaddib go find another dog to scratch and please target with better post than the one you just got there.
It seems that your president is losing his mind when standards of behavior has to be follow by anybody that will attend his Inaugural extravaganza and coronation.
I though you hate totalitarian governments after all you left your homeland because of one, but you don't see to recognized the behavior of the one we have in the white house.
Originally posted by Muaddib
Don't you mean since we were attacked by Muslim extremists?.........
Are you not allowed to bash, yell we are in a dictatorship, and blame Republicans like you always do?
Originally posted by TrickmastertricK
I don't think any President during a time of War, went all out on His inauguration, and being as this is his second term, it shouldn't have any novelty to it.
A.N.S.W.E.R. was an outgrowth of another organization headed by Clark, the International Action Center (IAC). Founded in 1990 during the run-up to the First Gulf War, IAC was the successor to the People's Anti-War Mobilization (PAM), and the Vietnam-era organization Youth Against War & Fascism (YAWF). All of these groups were sponsored by (and served as fronts for) the Worker's World Party (WWP).
The neo-Stalinist WWP broke away from the Trotskyite Socialist Worker's Party (SWP) in 1959 over a ?difference of opinion? concerning the Tibetan Uprising (the SWP sided with the Tibetan Buddhists, while the WWP supported the Chinese military action to crush the revolt). The WWP later distinguished themselves from other Marxist groups by opposing popular uprisings in Czechoslovakia (1968) and Poland (1981). They defended the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre in China, and would side with the KGB in the failed coup against Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev in 1991.
Under the leadership of Ramsey Clark, the IAC was the only major "anti-war" group that refused to condemn Saddam Hussein's invasion of Kuwait in 1990. Indeed, Clark actually flew to Baghdad and met with Saddam Hussein in November 1990, returning home with a handful of Saddam's "guests" (diplomats' families held hostage) as a token of the Iraqi dictator's goodwill.
Originally posted by marg6043
I will said that a very loved, wanted and admired president here in the US and abroad, would be more than safe in his own country and his own soil.
Obviously Mr. Bush lacks all, even his followers are starting to see that their beloved choice for leader is not so smart and after all.
I bet that before the elections the "activities" are going to be so dangerous that people will not be allowed to even gather for the inauguration for security reasons.
Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
I don't care if he has his innauguration, just don't have it at the expense of Social Security.