It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
I think there are some acts that are immoral by human standards..
None of the "victimless crimes" or morality police issues of course, just the big stuff..
Cold blooded murder, slavery, rape and childmolestion off the top of my head fit the bill.
I think those things could safely be considered "evil"...and without needing a diety to tell us that.
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
Their entire argument is based on 2 totally flawed points..
1: that the law of the land is the deciding factor of good or evil.
Maybe not the law itself, but certainly the type of people that make up the state where the laws are made determine what is good or evil. You know that sick feeling you get in your stomach when you consider child rapists? Well, that reaction is the result of conditioning by the society you were brought up in which determined sex with minors as abhorrent. If you think I am wrong, then tell me: if you go back to your 5 year old self and were asked "what are your views on adults having sex with children?" would your reaction then be the same as it is now?
2: that some scientific text book defines an adult as "some one who has reached puberty."
It's tricky to define when adulthood has set in. In most Western countries, the age of consent is between 16-21, with 18 being about the median. Now, such a calculation is not based purely on biological processes (when puberty is finished and adolescence begins) but rather social determinations such as the average life span.
If the average life span today was 20 years old (just imagine for arguments sake), do you think this would alter the determined age of consent compared to today's classification?
Well obviously laws have constantly been wrong, or we wouldn't have to change them...
I agree that laws ought to be revised from time to time as they need to adapt with the times.
originally posted by: kibric
a reply to: JoshuaCox
" over all good vs evil of adults marrying children after their first period.."
then Love must have a context in this debate
or you are just debating sex not marriage
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
I think there are some acts that are immoral by human standards..
Again, what makes them so? I am not asking you for a divine document proving that some act is unequivocally considered evil, I am just asking for you to show valid reasoning to support your arguments.
None of the "victimless crimes" or morality police issues of course, just the big stuff..
Cold blooded murder, slavery, rape and childmolestion off the top of my head fit the bill.
See how you classify those behaviours as "the big stuff"? You have obviously been conditioned (as most of us living today have) to view those acts as fitting the bill of the worst crimes imaginable.
I think those things could safely be considered "evil"...and without needing a diety to tell us that.
But why do you maintain such thoughts, is what I am getting at.
originally posted by: TinFoilSuit
Not to be merely a contrarian but, how would you define "real romance" in an adult relationship? Would it not be a combination of a shared enjoyment of certain activities? Maybe interspersed with love for the same foods? Romance is a very intangible and ambiguous act even among adults. Why would such a loosely defined concept be so much different for an "adult" than it would for a tween or a teen?
a reply to: Butterfinger
PS - With a pre-teen I can definitely see your point as they would not be capable of understanding the full ramifications of a physical relationship yet ... but I am curious about the rest.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: JoshuaCox
I honestly dont see where in the OT it says anything about specific ages of brides, including Mary in the NT.
If you can cite an underage marriage in the OT, please do. Actual scripture, as I presented actual scripture from Hadiths supporting my argument.
Its not cherry picking Im talking about the acts of ONE man, and the effects of it in his legacy. I'm not defending the OT or New, I'm deflecting the strawman arguments about Christianity put up in response to my posts. I never said "its bad because Jesus is the best!" so why hit me up with that?
Why not hit up Judaism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, etc? Again, not points Im defending.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
In the book of Numbers (31:18) God’s servant commands the Israelites to kill all of the used Midianite women who have been captured in war, and all of the boy children, but to keep all of the virgin girls for themselves. The Law of Moses spells out a purification ritual to prepare a captive virgin for life as a concubine. It requires her owner to shave her head and trim her nails and give her a month to mourn her parents before the first sex act (Deuteronomy 21:10-14). A Hebrew girl who is raped can be sold to her rapist for 50 shekels, or about $580 (Deuteronomy 22:28-29). He must then keep her as one of his wives for as long as she lives.
Abraham is married to his half-sister Sarah, but the two are childless for the first 75 years or so of their marriage. Frustrated, Sarah finally says, “The LORD has kept me from having children. Go, sleep with my slave; perhaps I can build a family through her.” Her slave, Hagar, becomes pregnant, and then later Sarah does too and the story gets complicated (Genesis 16). But that doesn’t stop Abraham’s grandson Jacob from participating in a competition, in which his two wives repeatedly send in their slaves to get pregnant by him, each trying to get more sons than the other (Genesis 30:1-22).
There are dozens of references validating both rape and slavery. It was a different time, so everyone else was doing it too. So I'm not pointing fingers soley at the bible. There is plenty of blame to go around.
Deuteronomy 21:10-14 Expanded Bible (EXB) 10 When you go to war against your enemies, the Lord will •help you defeat them [give them into your hands] so you will take them captive. 11 If you see a beautiful woman among the captives and are attracted to [desire; fall in love with] her, you may take her as your wife. 12 Bring her into your home, where she must shave her head and cut her nails 13 and change the clothes she was wearing when you captured her. After she has lived in your house and cried for her •parents [L father and her mother] for a month, you may marry her. You will be her husband, and she will be your wife. 14 But if you are not pleased with her, you must let her go anywhere she wants. You must not sell her for money or make her a slave, because you have taken away her honor [humiliated; exploited her].