It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: damwel
Your research on the topic seems to be grossly lacking.
Allah is NOT Yehovah etc. etc. etc.
Allah was a demonic/satanic moon god of a tribal cult way before Muhammed was born.
He merely co-opted the religion as a great way to conquer and take booty, including women.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: Annee
What does your post have to do with muhammed being a moral or divine figuare?
Moral? Who defines moral? You?
Divine? I have no interest. I'm atheist.
originally posted by: Annee
Provide source for Forced Marriage.
Women of that era had to marry. They had no other options.
From research it appears it was a happy marriage.
originally posted by: pheonix358
Just to correct this.
He married a 9 year old but ....
as far as I am aware ......
He didn't have sexual relations with the child until after 2 years.
It seems this makes a difference to some believers.
Most of our species has grown up a little, where this concept of a child bride sickens us .....
As It Should
originally posted by: Konduit
What is it about SJW's and Islam?
According to Bruckner, Leftist adherents of Third-Worldism hope to use Islamism as a "battering-ram" to bring about the downfall of free-market capitalism, and they see the sacrifice of individual rights - in particular, of women's rights - as an acceptable trade-off in service of the greater goal of destroying capitalism. Bruckner contends that Islamists, for their part, pretend to join the left in its opposition to racism, neocolonialism, and globalization as a tactical and temporary means to achieve their true goal of imposing the "totalitarian theocracy" of Islamist government.
originally posted by: Butterfinger
a reply to: BigBrotherDarkness
I'm not speaking for anyone else, but aside from the standard thread drifting; My beef is with the old man, and the way people deify him.
Jesus isnt even applicable here. As far as we know if he even existed, never took a partner let alone talked his best friend into giving him his daughter at 6 years old.
Might as well drag in Buddha, he was chaste, but the men at the time in China/India had the same penchant for pederasty. Its a fox hole, lets stick to OP. FWIW I'm not going to address anyone but Mohammed.
originally posted by: Thetan
Yikes, this should be interesting:
All cases of an adult having sexual relations with a nine year old child is a case of child molestation.
Muhamed was an adult who had sexual relations with nine year old child.
Therefore, Muhamed was a child molester.
This is the argument. The only way to prove the conclusion wrong is to show that one or both of the premises is false.
Ok so you basically have no issue of child molestation...
just want to fan flames in a specific direction and keep it on topic of hate by groups instead of the very act thats being used to fan those flames.