It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Teacher To Be Prosecuted For Calling Mohammed Child Molester

page: 12
33
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 16 2016 @ 12:58 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Maybe you should provide records that she wasnt a child, got that birth certificate?

Burden of proof tends to lie upon the one making the claim




posted on May, 16 2016 @ 12:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Lysergic

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Lysergic

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
he married a 9 year old girl, the teacher has a point.


How does someone know how old someone is when they didn't keep track of age or birth records?


How could anyone confuse a 9 yr old child for an adult woman?


Woman = first menstrual.


LOL

NAMBLA would love you.


Did they have NAMBLA a thousand years ago?



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:00 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Yeah, pretty much, just ran under a different name.

Mohammed apparently wasn't just a president but also a member.


Keep 'em coming.
edit on 16-5-2016 by Lysergic because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Lysergic

Yes and the claim of the OP is that Muhammad is a child molester. Therefore burden of prooof would be providing solid evidence to support that fact. None has been provided. Just a bunch of Islam hating purple agreeing without understanding the customs of the time. Ignorance at its finest.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:01 AM
link   
a reply to: Joecanada11

Go blame the Hadith.


Not just Islam, I hate all the ass backwards religions.

nobody went to the moon on a horse.

And why does time dictate if we can't talk crap about stupid customs?


If it's bad, it's bad, doesn't matter when it occurred.

I await your scholarly reply with bated breath.




edit on 16-5-2016 by Lysergic because: allahuackbar



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:05 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Do I need to go into the hadiths in which stories are told of the glorious prophet kissing little boys both north and south of their belt lines, calling them "beautiful pearls, as pure as Virgin girls?"

Obvious pedophile is obvious, as are obvious pandering apologists.

edit on 16-5-2016 by burdman30ott6 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:06 AM
link   
a reply to: Annee

Yes, it was called Islam.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Lysergic

Yeah and nobody raised themselves from the dead or walked on water. The point is that every make up until 100 years ago would marry girls as soon as they could bear children. So it wasn't considered pedophilia. It was the way of life. Hence calling Muhammad a child molester is not a sound arguement.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:09 AM
link   

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: Lysergic

Yeah and nobody raised themselves from the dead or walked on water. The point is that every make up until 100 years ago would marry girls as soon as they could bear children. So it wasn't considered pedophilia. It was the way of life. Hence calling Muhammad a child molester is not a sound arguement.


Haha, did you just try to get at me with some sort of jab by using Zombie Jesus?

Thats great, a pedophile doesn't consider it a crime either, they see it as a way of life.

You sure love to make excuses for other peoples actions.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:11 AM
link   
Here what I hope Mohammed and Jesus are doing right now;




posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:12 AM
link   
a reply to: Lysergic

You seem to think you would have been above it. I can guarantee if you lived five hundred years ago you wouldn't be talking the same ahit. You would be like everyone else. Girls weren't girls they were in more ways adults than girls of the same age now.

As pointed out before life expectancy was low and infant mortality rates so high that becoming pregnant as soon as possible and as many times as possible before death was necessary to ensure family survival.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: Lysergic

You seem to think you would have been above it. I can guarantee if you lived five hundred years ago you wouldn't be talking the same ahit. You would be like everyone else. Girls weren't girls they were in more ways adults than girls of the same age now.

As pointed out before life expectancy was low and infant mortality rates so high that becoming pregnant as soon as possible and as many times as possible before death was necessary to ensure family survival.


Strawman argument.


You loose, thanks for playing.



edit on 16-5-2016 by Lysergic because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:13 AM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6

That's an idiotic reply again. More hate. Do you know anything about Islam or just what Glenn beck and other morons speak about it.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: burdman30ott6

That's an idiotic reply again. More hate. Do you know anything about Islam or just what Glenn beck and other morons speak about it.


I know it's based on lies, just like all religions.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:15 AM
link   
a reply to: Lysergic

No it's a fact. You lose you've provided zero susntance and ignore facts and reality. I don't expect much more from you though but little quips and avoiding any true discussion with facts. Peanut



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:17 AM
link   
a reply to: Lysergic

Yes that I agree. The point is that the practice only changed in the last 100 years here in western culture. So to call Muhammad a child molester is to say we all are ancestors or child molestors. Facts are facts son.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:18 AM
link   
a reply to: Lysergic

And little pictures. What are you like thirteen. Maybe study last civilizations and come back when you are old enough to vote lol.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:19 AM
link   
a reply to: Joecanada11

You don't understand. Go google strawman argument its what you presented, learn some debate skillz bruh.

Yet, I really don't care.

Mohammed was a Pedophile, and his followers defend his pedophilia.

Peanut? Haha, whoa there man, getting all crazy.

You lost and now it burns your ass, haha.



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: Joecanada11
a reply to: Lysergic

And little pictures. What are you like thirteen. Maybe study last civilizations and come back when you are old enough to vote lol.


Yeah, I'm 13, joined here at my birth.

How about I'll stay here and wait for you to grow a pair instead of attempting to be dismissive because you know I can debate circles around you. eh?

edit on 16-5-2016 by Lysergic because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2016 @ 01:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Annee

Yes, it was called Islam.


Sounds like you have a personal problem.




top topics



 
33
<< 9  10  11    13  14  15 >>

log in

join