NOMIC & BANK COLLAPSE ICE Agent Commits Suicide in NYC; Leaves Note Revealing Gov't Plans

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
I need to get out ahead on this one, who are we blaming for this, obama, trump or hillary ?

All of the above?
Don't forget the Bushs'.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: hubrisinxs

I think he was murdered.

That thought actually crossed my mind as well!

Rawstory.com has this down as a "Right wing loon conspiracy". Why does it always end up being the right wing loons that have the good stories?
I guess the left is too busy rioting and causing trouble at Trump rallies.
www.rawstory.com...

a reply to: Quadrivium

I am a 21+ years federal law enforcement official who is in the military. Been to several Fema Camps....I love this country and it's people and don't think for one second the Cops wouldn't be the first to rise up against this...this article is 100% B.S. and is "Canned Doom Porn", crafted by a creative yet completely ignorant person to what's truly going 9n behind the scenes.

originally posted by: IridescentPhoenix
a reply to: Quadrivium

I am a 21+ years federal law enforcement official who is in the military. Been to several Fema Camps....I love this country and it's people and don't think for one second the Cops wouldn't be the first to rise up against this...this article is 100% B.S. and is "Canned Doom Porn", crafted by a creative yet completely ignorant person to what's truly going 9n behind the scenes.

Thank you for your service! In your honest opinion how bad would it have to get before the cops "rise up"? IT has been shown in the recent past when told to stand down and let people loot, pillage and destroy they did just that.

a reply to: Quadrivium

I was told this scenario, by a highly credible source, nearly a year ago and it is pretty much spot on.

IF this IS real and YOU are part of the martial law LEO force who has been told these things....why would you honor a government that would turn on its own? For what....money?

When the time comes, just say no and let us go.

I was also told that any threat to civilians such as this, will be met with neutralizing opposition en mass and Uncle Sam will be left without honor or victory.

originally posted by: Boadicea
a reply to: Maverick1

Thank you for explaining -- much appreciated!

One question I have is why the officers would go to that particular station, since it's not exactly "mainstream," and therefore doesn't have much... what's the word? Clout? Credibility? Respectability?

Assuming it's true for the sake of this conversation; Did one/more of the whistleblower officers have a personal connection to someone at the station? Did they try to go to reputable (and I use that term loosely!) news media only to be dismissed? Did they suspect a mainstream news agency would sit on the story -- but report them to their superiors/other authorities?

I'd like to know more background on the hows and whys of this station getting the story... (and people in hell want ice water, right???)

Did you read the article? Your question is specifically addressed and answered. I seriously get annoyed when people don't bother to even read, or at least read carefully, things before forming/offering an opinion on them.

1. How and,why was a rather obscure story on a fairly unknown website so quickly found and rebutted by snopes? (Snopes is a site devoted to keeping people thinking the official story or idea and definitely goes by the premise of "the best way to hide a lie is between two truths").

2. Who runs this news / radio site? The authorship seems of dubious origin, almost like it is also a government disinfo site. (Or maybe not, but dubious it is)

3. Did the dead man write the note? It almost seems as if it was created in order to debunk it.

4. Whether real, or disinfo (i do not think its a "hoax"), the note is very interesting. It reads as if the writer (or perceived writer) speaks as a combination of some real info that he has mixed with paranoia and his own conclusions which are probably not entirely accurate. We can see where the writing has madea story of disparate pieces of info, some personal, some common ideas on the web.

5. My gut says this note was created by disinfo agents with a specific purpose, most likely to have a debunking posted on snopes. Purpose? To discredit future real stories.

a reply to: Quadrivium

The note explains how preppers will be delt with first and those who resist.

Preppers are making even more prep.

Consume, consume…

They probably put the mind laser on him, that coupled with a few gang stalkers and it'll make you want to kill yourself inside a month.

I won't refute what was quoted because it seems all too feasible to me, however I'd love to see the original copy of that note. If one has enough to quote in an article, one surly has enough to present a factual base. Whether it be hard copy or digital pictures.

That said, the media has been working overtime for some time to divide we the people into our many faced facets. So much so that our current presidential candidates are a serial liar and a bigot, add in a race war and demoralizing living standards brought on by an economic collapse and you will have a recipe for mass hysteria.

Then the fault will fall on Obama for some reason, as the president that drove the country into the ground. The Fed Gov probably does have it all figured out. They'll have trump put up his walls, kill off all who appose, and enslave those left. Good ol merica reverts back to its original self.

a reply to: Quadrivium
The Superstation 95 story was updated this morning May 12 at 1:16 a.m. Eastern time and is beneath the original story. They seem to be pretty hot about the attacks from Snopes and Rawstory.

"In closing, we at SuperStation95 work very hard to get real news that the public can make use of. We do not filter our news based upon political correctness. The fact that Snopes.com went to great lengths to attack us, and now a radical left-wing cesspool like RAWSTORY.com has chosen to do the same, calls to mind the saying "Thou doth protest too much."

This seems like an awful lot of media exposure and effort to unleash if, as these outlets claim, our facts are wrong. Why such a strenuous response to something which is allegedly incorrect? Perhaps, as you may be starting to see, our story IS correct. The powers-that-be know it . . . and they're now pulling out all the stops to cover it up.

Sorry folks, the cat's out of the bag and nothing you folks in government - or your henchmen in the mass-media - can do, will cover this up.

We stand-by this story and all the stories we write and hope that you, the reader, can hear the "ring of truth" in our reporting, as we continue to uncover exclusive information and report the facts. To that end, we have now "exposed" the journalistic writing of Mr Travis J. Gettys as "FALSE" and hope that RAWSTORY enjoys a dose of its own medicine."


They say there will be a follow up article later today.

"Since this story has become dated, we have decided to incorporate our SNOPES.com and RAWSTORY.com rebuttals seen above, into a new story for publication later today, May 12. The politically-correct left wing is clearly on the warpath that certain government plans seem to have been exposed. It thus seems best to bring this issue to the fore rather than let it go quietly into the night. The more they try to cover this up or discredit it, the more we will cover it. "

www.superstation95.com...

a reply to: LuFri

I support S95 100%. Our government is not in our best interest and hasn't been since JFK.

a reply to: dr1234

Did you read the article? Your question is specifically addressed and answered. I seriously get annoyed when people don't bother to even read, or at least read carefully, things before forming/offering an opinion on them.

Ooooh! The seriously annoyed ATS Context Nazi!!!

Yes, actually I did read the entire article, before this OP was posted early yesterday morning, and before the updates were added late the night before. Hence the reason for my surprise -- and initial comment -- that Snopes had posted something so quickly. And though I did in fact take the time to check out the Snopes article, the date/time of posting in particular, no, I did not go back to the source article and read the update. I'd tell you how very sorry I am for seriously annoying you, but I'd be lying, because I'm not sorry at all. If I had offered false information as fact, I would apologize profusely. If you had offered the answer to my musings, I would have "doh'd" and thanked you profusely. But the truth is, I'm not especially impressed that your best contribution to the thread was a snarky comment to another member about a comment not even addressed to you, for missing one sentence in an update to a rather long article.... and just because it seriously annoyed you.

However, for the benefit of others, here is the answer to my seriously annoying comment:

The person from NYPD who gave us this information did so after trying to get two other New York Media outlets, (one TV, the other a newspaper) to publish the story and was rebuked within minutes by media contacts who said "we won't touch this with a ten foot pole."

Well, if our government is going to eventually go full-on "1984" (George Orwell's book), it would make sense to go after the preppers and big anti-government voices first.

I

originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: Quadrivium

On the Snopes page where they "debunked" this, I was intrigued by something in the "About the Author" section - have a look

Kim LaCapria is a New York-based content manager and longtime snopes.com message board participant. Although she was investigated and found to be "probably false" by snopes.com in early 2002, Kim later began writing for the site due to an executive order unilaterally passed by President Obama during a secret, late-night session (without the approval of Congress). Click like and share if you think this is an egregious example of legislative overreach.

She was previously found to be writing false things, but now Snopes wants her to work for them? Why in the hell would Snopes want to advertise this? Is this a typo?

That is very, very strange. I wonder if it is all true?

a reply to: Maverick1

Why would superstation risk readers and listeners for hal turner? Someone who has only paid superstation for airtime, before his funds ran out.

a reply to: blueman12

it sounds like "All snopes authors" have cheesy, fake profiles. Still, Superstation 95 did address every single point made in the Snopes article and makes Kim lacadia look like a chump.

originally posted by: blueman12
a reply to: Maverick1

Why would superstation risk readers and listeners for hal turner? Someone who has only paid superstation for airtime, before his funds ran out.

The info stated, by superstation95 itself on its FB page, lists the date the station 'started'as the exact same date that Turner was hired. October 7th, 2015. Read that twice---the day the station was founded was the very day Hal Turner begin 'paying for airtime.'

Superstaion95 seems to be just a sock-puppet website for Hal Turner. It is certainly not listed in any log of actual NYC radio stations.

It would be really helpful if anyone in that local area could actually tune it in. One poster a few pages back already stated he couldn't locate it.

We need to determine, I would think first, if Superstaion95 is in fact an actual radio station.

They(SS95) DID post what they claim is an FCC license, but it seems pretty abstract, at least to my novice eye, it looked more like a building permit for something.

Can anyone in NYC tune this station in??

"New York City's newest radio station. 95.1-FM Classic Rock, News and Talk" is the overview.

a reply to: LuFriwow. Thanks for the update. I will keep watch for it.