a reply to: dragonridr
Sorry for the late reply, fair point and valid.
But what when you get down to the sub atomic level, where exactly, not roughly is the nucleus of an atom, of course you know all about sub atomic
oscillation's and how the exact location becomes impossible to predict the so called zero point energy at level's even below this and perhap's below
the level of the quarck, superstring theory and membrane universe theory leading into the whole idea of superspace and the genuinely impossible nature
of a place that has unknown and possibly even no laws that we can understand and how that feeds back through the whole membrance interaction theory of
our universe creation and of course other similar theory's which ALSO describe a foam like structure or as I would call it a sponge with it's holes
and matrix (not the film or the idea of a simulation I don't buy into that - the material of space time relevent to us).
Mathematics was not my weak point but I did have an almost allergic reaction to anything math's related or might if the glove had been on the other
hand been a physicist myself, I actually love the hypothetical side of it and know that it offers an almost alchemical key to the understanding and
ultimately control of the universe - which in a metaphysical way I see as exactly the same thing, when a mind - consciousness gain's that level of
aware understanding (Assuming it also expand's to accomodate this level of awareness to higher level's of consciousness and awareness) it may be able
to manipulate the universe itself by thought and consciousness alone, thought's forming quantum causality structures at the smallest level and feeding
back to manipulate the macro structure of the universe in a very real manner which would become mind and will but of course at that point would the
mind actually be the universe?, or like most system's would that only become possible if the mind grew bigger than the universe in the old idea that
for a system to understand itself it has to become larger than itself and hence never shall truly understand itself? (so far so new age crap but that
is not my point, my point is a mind may be able to act upon the smallest quantum levers of reality and shift it just so much but enought for
understanding to become a practical structure at that level of consciousness).
I actually did not misinterpret Schroedingers hypothesis though, though it has to be said in so far as Schroedinger himself was talking you may
regard it so since though a theorist there were some places he would not go what with Quantum theory starting to sound more metaphysical by the day
and many normal physicists whom worked to the older empirical world view giving increasing resistance (Which still exists today) against the quantum
Here are some interesting pages that came up on a quick google search, hate bing.
But to throw a sabot into the weaver this is interesting.
But the universe may be even wierder, go back to the big bang, what caused it was it really just two or more brains (mebrains) colliding in
superspace that hypothetical realm outside of our normal time space or is that just a part of the much larger whole.
I hypothesised that as well as einsteins idea of negative universe that if you go to the very centre of a gravity well there is a point of obvious
zero gravity and it being surrounded by the mass (Which I see as scrunched up time space or superstring/field that is a wave form oscillating in
synchronization to the time space continuum time frequency in which we live our day to day existance (our reality may be only one of many out of phase
with one another even in this - not parrallel's but in the same time space but out of phase - different time frequencys to create a coarse analogy),
so for us the matter is like a wave and our reality is like a boat moving at the same speed as that wave accross the suface of the pond tha is our
superfield or superstring and since Gravity is one of the weakest forces and it has been hypothesised that it may be coming from another membrain
universe in superspace that is only peripherally contacting the one from which the bulk of our reality is formed then gravity may be at a ration of 1
to 1 across the whole of our superstring/field, were mass is scrunched up into that standing wave form it therefore has more gravity were cubic area
in the three dimension's of our physical reality - time I see as coming from opposite to gravity but that is another far longer thing to explain).
So that point in the centre of the black hole is surrounded by mass, which lenses gravity, as that star collapsed and turns into a black hole (True
black hole not one of the weaker brown holes that do not fully collapse into singularity) then that point must be pulled in all direction's, as an
event horizon form's outside the black hole one formes around this tiny sub atomic point at it's centre, now there is only so much you can do this
superfield/superstring so therefor under this force of gravity pulling in all directions on this tiny point it must be forced to expand or to
invert/tear drawing whatever is on the other side from the gravity with this superfield in between into this tiny isolated pocket, it couse is raw
time space energy and wallah a new pocket universe is created by the force of the collapse in the parenet continuum of a super massive star.
Now all this force and energy mean's that if you could measure time in the parent and daugher continuii you would find time is faster in the daughter
continuum, at least unto quantum evaporation finally closes the black home that birthed it but that would fully happen until the daugher continuum has
expanded to reach the now static surrounding (Black holes internal) event horizon (stars and galaxy's accelerating away from the observor not slowing
down?) - at which point that time space will have succumbed to entropy and time will then be at neutral for both continuii as they simply then
But therefore other than parrallel reality, just how many time space continuii are there potentially on our superstring/field along?.