It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Thetan
I'm going to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the physical universe has NOT always existed and that there WAS a beginning to it. Follow me closely.
Quiescent-"in a state or period of inactivity or dormancy."
Premise 1: If the physical universe has always existed, then an actual infinite amount of events have taken place because energy is never quiescent.
Premise 2: Actual infinities are impossible.
Conclusion: Therefore, the physical universe has not always existed.
Now, to support my premises. Let's start with Premise 1. Energy(and condensed energy which is matter) is always moving, ALWAYS. The fact of the matter(no pun intended) is modern science has never empirically determined a time when it hasn't been; if you contend that there was a point in time when the physical universe was totally still, you certainly are not basing your conclusion on sound reason and evidence. There is simply no reason to believe that the physical universe has ever been quiescent! www.marxists.org...
washington.osd.wednet.edu...
Now for premise 2: If the physical universe has always existed and has never been quiescent,( see above) then that means that right now the energetic particles in this physical universe have moved, literally, an infinite amount of times. But that is physically impossible! It's impossible because actual infinities are impossible. What do I mean by "actual infinities? I mean this. sites.middlebury.edu...
m.youtube.com...
Thus, with premise 1 and 2 established as sound, we come to the conclusion; a conclusion that follows necessarily from the premises. Now if the physical universe hasn't always existed, then it must have began.
originally posted by: Thetan
I'm going to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the physical universe has NOT always existed and that there WAS a beginning to it. Follow me closely.
Premise 1: If the physical universe has always existed, then an actual infinite amount of events have taken place because energy is never quiescent.
Premise 2: Actual infinities are impossible.
Conclusion: Therefore, the physical universe has not always existed.
Now, to support my premises. Let's start with Premise 1. Energy(and condensed energy which is matter) is always moving, ALWAYS.
The fact of the matter(no pun intended) is modern science has never empirically determined a time when it hasn't been;
if you contend that there was a point in time when the physical universe was totally still, you certainly are not basing your conclusion on sound reason and evidence.
There is simply no reason to believe that the physical universe has ever been quiescent! www.marxists.org...
washington.osd.wednet.edu...
Now for premise 2: If the physical universe has always existed and has never been quiescent,( see above) then that means that right now the energetic particles in this physical universe have moved, literally, an infinite amount of times.
But that is physically impossible! It's impossible because actual infinities are impossible.
Thus, with premise 1 and 2 established as sound, we come to the conclusion; a conclusion that follows necessarily from the premises. Now if the physical universe hasn't always existed, then it must have began.
originally posted by: Thetan
I'm going to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the physical universe has NOT always existed and that there WAS a beginning to it. Follow me closely.
Quiescent-"in a state or period of inactivity or dormancy."
Premise 1: If the physical universe has always existed, then an actual infinite amount of events have taken place because energy is never quiescent.
Premise 2: Actual infinities are impossible.
Conclusion: Therefore, the physical universe has not always existed.
Now, to support my premises. Let's start with Premise 1. Energy(and condensed energy which is matter) is always moving, ALWAYS. The fact of the matter(no pun intended) is modern science has never empirically determined a time when it hasn't been; if you contend that there was a point in time when the physical universe was totally still, you certainly are not basing your conclusion on sound reason and evidence. There is simply no reason to believe that the physical universe has ever been quiescent! www.marxists.org...
washington.osd.wednet.edu...
Now for premise 2: If the physical universe has always existed and has never been quiescent,( see above) then that means that right now the energetic particles in this physical universe have moved, literally, an infinite amount of times. But that is physically impossible! It's impossible because actual infinities are impossible. What do I mean by "actual infinities? I mean this. sites.middlebury.edu...
m.youtube.com...
Thus, with premise 1 and 2 established as sound, we come to the conclusion; a conclusion that follows necessarily from the premises. Now if the physical universe hasn't always existed, then it must have began.
originally posted by: Thetan
Proof that there was a beginning!
Thus, with premise 1 and 2 established as sound, we come to the conclusion; a conclusion that follows necessarily from the premises. Now if the physical universe hasn't always existed, then it must have began.
originally posted by: Phantom423
Could you please cite the physics journal that supports your position? Thank you.