It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lysergic
Good on Granny, allow me to join in on the pro-gun circle jerk before jealous Brits show up.
Ker-sploosh-a.
I should order some .223 ammo to celebrate.
originally posted by: syrinx high priest
2nd ammendment ?
was she part of a militia ?
Obviously this person would prefer that this great grandmother and her husband would have died instead of the criminal.
Because liberal dogma.
originally posted by: syrinx high priest
2nd ammendment ?
was she part of a militia ?
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
originally posted by: JustAnObservation
originally posted by: syrinx high priest
2nd ammendment ?
was she part of a militia ?
Do you know when the 2nd ammendment was written? It was written at a time where guns were vital to survival. 1791, when most people still hunted for their food, the country was much wilder than it is today (animal attacks likely) and arguably far more dangerous. Many lived in remote places. Guns were VITAL. For everyone. Not just the militia. So think about it critically; who do you think the ammendment actually refers to? The average Joe, who needed it to feed and protect his family in year 1791. That aside as others have mentioned, the wording implies the same.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Krakatoa
...
Crazy people should not have guns. Do you disagree with that? If so, how??
...
Cars and guns - they will never go away in the USA - at least not in any of our lifetimes.