Hillary admitting she suffers from decision fatigue

..


a reply to: BO XIAN


Welp-ah,, you know what they say..

You can be a of bit of a b#$^ if you can survive the wilderness with a 'cycle a wood shack built wit' a couple o 'tubafers' n some tincans, oh yeahh. Heh.


KIDDING, but on a more serious note her style of high office tuneouts n book nights and striding imperialism ain't suit'n the voting public one bit wouldn't cha say but -hey-.."BO XIAN".

Maybe you can be a cabinet member, ya- know..Keep 'er in line a bit while we're all grillin hotdogs and shoot'n geese n'whatever,..


Thanks-a-bunch it'd be great.



lol peace out..

a reply to: Domo1


hahahahahahahahaha

I can't determine if that is a good thing or a bad thing. Might just sleep on it.

Personally I get decision fatigue just trying to decide on supper day after day. Sometimes it gets so bad I end up eating a bologna sammich with chips because I can't decide on dinner.

That said... If I am decision fatigued over supper then keep me away from the White House because there will be times nobody will eat.

Hillary needs to do what McCain needs to do. Just retire from politics altogether.

a reply to: Terminal1


"Nobody will eat!!" etcetera..

But really does every pip and pecadillo of what some o us folks are doin out here on an off night deciding on a ham sammich really compare I mean come on. One thing/another and I hope this dang "decisionfatigue" thing doesn't become to much of a "thing" when we're talking about some guy deciding a can of soda isn't important or whatever-

Ps I don't give a dam about the wh. I don't see what all the circling around hinting at issues here is about. I get "decision fatigued" It's with being on this website with people arguing over grammar and other unimportant things when I have a life to attend..!!..

a reply to: breakingbs

No soup for you!!

a reply to: Terminal1

..aww.

Goshdernit.

a reply to: breakingbs

It's bad enough being on the same planet as the gritchy one.

In the same town would be hurl alert time.

In the same cabinet would be screaming fit, run for one's life time.

Thanks anyway.

LOL.

Thanks for your kind reply.

a reply to: BO XIAN

Lol.

a reply to: BO XIAN

This is such juvenile, repetitive junk, BO. Why do you persist in calling Hillary "the gritchy one"?
Are members rewarding you for that kind of puerile writing?


"The Gritchy One". What, are you twelve?
No - you are not.

Act your age.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: BO XIAN

This is such juvenile, repetitive junk, BO. Why do you persist in calling Hillary "the gritchy one"?
Are members rewarding you for that kind of puerile writing?


"The Gritchy One". What, are you twelve?
No - you are not.

Act your age.

I thought it was a compliment.

originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: BO XIAN

This is such juvenile, repetitive junk, BO. Why do you persist in calling Hillary "the gritchy one"?
Are members rewarding you for that kind of puerile writing?


"The Gritchy One". What, are you twelve?
No - you are not.

Act your age.

They do that because it's popular. Like a properly-trained animal, they have come to learn that certain actions will be rewarded with a "treat". That "treat" is confirmation bias in the form of stars and flags.

Or you could compare it to the school bully that does what he does because the people around him "egg it on".

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

BECAUSE

she persists in demonstrating such hideous behaviors and personality factors.

As long as she parades such hideousness in her heavy-handed rush for another dictatorial position, I suspect I'll continue to label a spade a spade.

Besides . . . the idea of typing her name is extremely offensive to my fingers and my keyboard.

a reply to: BO XIAN

That's all so silly, though, BO.

I understand - that's how I felt about Ted Cruz - but seriously - isn't it better to just not comment than to peddle pejorative terminology?

a reply to: BO XIAN

Dude. You are a "professional" (or so you claim). Act like a professional.

A rational professional in the mental health area would not stoop to such silly middle-school crap.
Don't wreck your reputation, BO.

I certainly know and acknowledge that I have done the very same thing regarding other candidates.....
perhaps we, as professionals, can help shore each other up on this......
keep each other from being ridiculous.

Ya think?

a reply to: BO XIAN

she persists in demonstrating such hideous behaviors and personality factors.

By taking the "low road" and acting as you have in regards to Hillary, is it unreasonable to suggest that you and others have demonstrated the same personality flaws?

As long as she parades such hideousness in her heavy-handed rush for another dictatorial position, I suspect I'll continue to label a spade a spade.

Do you mind if we do the same to those that exhibit similar qualities?

Besides . . . the idea of typing her name is extremely offensive to my fingers and my keyboard.

Do you require a safe space?

a reply to: Domo1


everyone gets tired

There is no mental acuity test to determine if someone is capable of being an evil dictatorial tyrant.

All hail Queen Hillary!

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

I'm past caring THAT much about my "reputation."

Besides, I think TRUTH is a pretty high priority.

And the gritchy one has a hard time with the truth.

I don't mind sharing the truth in whatever startling or even annoying way I can.

As to professional mental health folks . . . as my own class demonstrated . . . we come in all sizes and shapes.

I have found that my reputation with those who matter significantly depended on how observant they were about my character and my kindness. On those scores, I've been quite satisfied with the responses of 3,000+ students--many of whom volunteered wonderful assessments.

Carping net folks who don't seem to have a great deal of perceptiveness or discernment don't cause me to lose any sleep.

One thing about baiting, the media is going to continue it
with Trump as the presumptive candidate.

Every day I read dozens of articles with name calling
at Trump. If the professionals in the media care to
tone it down, it might help. I don't see it happening,
as their candidate is mucked in mire of her own doing.

They have little chance of winning if they tell the truth,
report accurately, and remain civil. They will intentionally
pull everyone down with them into the circus.

But let anyone dare to print an article calling Hillary a name,
my goodness it is unfair and unethical because she is a ?

And the truth about her is practically unchecked, as in
the media gatekeeping with Bills "alleged" affairs....
and her "alleged heath problems".

These are not allegations; Bill Clinton admitted his
infidelities ( a nice word ) and Hillary was in the hospital
with known and very serious health problems.

a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Hey, it's a ridiculous era.

With Trump and the gritchy one racing for the figurehead Oval Office,

how can ANYONE fuss over ANYONE ELSE

being or appearing ridiculous????

LOLOL.

Besides, like beauty, I've found that ridiculous tends to be in the eyes of the beholder.