It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Trump Supporter Social Experiment Gone Wrong

page: 10
47
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 8 2016 @ 05:27 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth

I was calling Trump and his actions authoritarian. He has people removed from his rallies, even if they are only standing in silent protest. Sure, he has that right.

At least Bernie let those BLM ladies speak when they came on stage.

That shows quite a difference between the two. Bernie is tolerant and lets people speak. Trump throws them out on their asses.

Trump is the authoritarian.




posted on May, 8 2016 @ 05:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth

I was calling Trump and his actions authoritarian. He has people removed from his rallies, even if they are only standing in silent protest. Sure, he has that right.

At least Bernie let those BLM ladies speak when they came on stage.

That shows quite a difference between the two. Bernie is tolerant and lets people speak. Trump throws them out on their asses.

Trump is the authoritarian.


That's a different point.

My original point stands - if the protesters did not agitate or engage in violence, there would be no problem.
Your own example is just further proof. A lady who protested peacefully was removed from the venue without violence.

edit on 8/5/2016 by UKTruth because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 06:31 PM
link   
OH. And by the way. Happy Mother's Day everyone.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 06:54 PM
link   
This guy had some balls with this social experiment.




posted on May, 8 2016 @ 07:00 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth



My original point stands - if the protesters did not agitate or engage in violence, there would be no problem.


My point stands as well. If a woman standing silently as a form of silent protest, not engaging in agitation or violence, had to be removed...there is a problem. But the problem is not with the protester.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
This guy had some balls with this social experiment.


Well, it fits with the attention seeking crowd that is the YouTube generation.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 08:22 PM
link   
He'd find the same level of ignorance and violence in the Appalachian boonies as he did in urban areas. These people are told what to think and are lemmings following their fellows lock step with fear of being singled out for persecution or ostracism. They have no critical thinking skills, no ability to research information or process it. If they're told some candidate will give them more or another candidate is their enemy and will take something away from them, that's all they understand. Both sides do it but the left is the worse offender.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 08:25 PM
link   
a reply to: UKTruth>>>> Trump is a bully and arrogant and short tempered. But Hillary is by FAR the most authoritarian of any candidate and worse than Trump in any of those flaws.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 11:04 PM
link   
a reply to: rockintitz

I dont think Ron Paul was constantly # talking every minority group.
There are also tons of videos going around with wonderful Trump quotes compiled.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 11:15 PM
link   
a reply to: Konduit

It amuses me how Liberals are always the ones getting tetchy and violent very quickly.. in the defence of free speach and equal rights.

Always the first to call bull# on any Consevative/Republican agenda by spewing whatever the media has fed them, not thinking for themselves most of the time.

Trump in America = branded racist. Cameron in Britain = against equality. And yet I feel Liberals believe in solving things with violence and shouting down the opposition regardless the validity of their argument.

Anything for free borders and free benefits. Why not sell your soul too.

#rantover

edit on 8/5/2016 by L.A.B because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 12:23 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



My original point stands - if the protesters did not agitate or engage in violence, there would be no problem.


My point stands as well. If a woman standing silently as a form of silent protest, not engaging in agitation or violence, had to be removed...there is a problem. But the problem is not with the protester.


You have no point.

If she is protesting (peaceful or not) inside a private event she will be removed under the grounds that nobody has the responsibility to let her speak or show her message. The only ones that have a right to make other people hear what they want them to, are the ones that rent the venue for the event. Freedom of speech only applies in public venues with the exception of private malls and universities under particular conditions in some states.

"Owners of private property generally have no responsibility to allow demonstrators or pamphleteers onto their property to communicate their messages since the U.S. Constitution applies to the government, not private actors."
- news.findlaw.com...


And has a little bonus:

There is a problem with her because if there wasn't one, she wouldn't be protesting would she? You only protest when you have a problem with or oppose something. The definition itself is pretty clear.

Protest:

a. To express a strong objection to (something).

b. To participate in a public demonstration in opposition to (something).


You seem to always appear in these type of threads to stir up discussions in favor of the liberal agenda. It's a little annoying.



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 01:01 AM
link   

originally posted by: supremecommander
a reply to: DBCowboy

Yes it is authoritarian. And I'll gladly embrace the label. Racists are subhuman garbage.


Bigots no matter what reason are bad. youre bigoted against racist. Hypocritical much me thinks?

Look were all one race. soon as people accept it things will change. And w eand others have explained what trump specifically said but you seem to ignore that. Statistics back up his claims and as such its not "racist" to say what he said.



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 01:05 AM
link   

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: UKTruth



As was evidenced by this woman's peaceful protest inside, there was no trouble at all when she was removed.


If she was no trouble, only standing quietly in silent protest, why was she removed?


BEcause it was a eyesore and distracting.



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 01:24 AM
link   
Unfortunately where I live the majority are Pro-Trump. I only say that's unfortunate cause I'm also pro Trump and I'd love to see one of these dregs of society come at me aggressively. Depending on the size discrepancy they're either catching a bullet or brass knuckles to the jaw. These losers are the people who deserve to be poor and NOT collect welfare, not the Veterans living on the streets.

TRUMP 16'



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 01:31 AM
link   
a reply to: LesMisanthrope

So, by that video, when I disagree with someones views, violence, is the most correct answer?



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 04:15 AM
link   

originally posted by: LesMisanthrope
This guy had some balls with this social experiment.



If you listen to some of the hate being spewed at this man, one of the 'protesters' complaints against this man is that he turned up at all to challenge their protest. The man actually lives in the town and the protesters were upset that he would come out to express his views. They seemed to think he was being disruptive. Quite ironic.



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 06:12 AM
link   
"Oh look at me... Poor Donald, the victim. I'm such a yuuuuge victim, look at me. I can slander and lie as I speak but as soon as someone sees the bull#... I'm a victim... Poor me."



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 06:14 AM
link   

originally posted by: kazanoom
"Oh look at me... Poor Donald, the victim. I'm such a yuuuuge victim, look at me. I can slander and lie as I speak but as soon as someone sees the bull#... I'm a victim... Poor me."


I think you captured what's going on and the general view of the people, which I think is why Trump won. The Republican voters rejected the violent 'protesters' hate and incitement.



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 06:36 AM
link   
And this blathering idiot plays the "Bill card"... He's sooooo full of himself, he doesn't even consider all the misogynistic and vulgar things he said that are captured on radio and tv for eternity. This is not a fight between Hillary and Trump. This is a fight between integrity and common sense vs. Narcissism and greed. Trump does not care about you... not one bit.



posted on May, 9 2016 @ 07:03 AM
link   
a reply to: Sillyolme




a reply to: Konduit
No there's nothing that lends credence to Trumps platform because well frankly, he doesn't have one. He has names to call and lies to tell. Oh and he needs to study the tabloids too because like you tube vids they are a splendid source of information. Lol.


IF this is true, if he doesn't have a platform, and all he does is call names and tell lies and acts like a kid, then why are so many people so upset to the point of physically attacking his supporters? I mean wouldn't it be better to be the "Adult" and be the "better person" and let him talk himself into the ground? Instead anti-trumpers are throwing tantrums, lashing out, picking on the handicap, old, and young, destroying property, and just all around acting like a young kid that is mad because his parents won't buy him a phone.





top topics



 
47
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join