It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As I recall, there was a movie about this a few years ago. It was actually a good movie tho I don't think it was ever revealed who invaded.
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: mazzroth
Is this show Australian?
Australian television is atrocious, I have very little faith in it being any good, even with a good story behind it
originally posted by: tommo39
a reply to: mazzroth
Well, i live in Indonesia and it certainly wouldn't be them. If it was, their navy consists of hand me down's boats from Aussie, rowboats, rubber duckies, skiffs and the like. The airforce is outdated with few planes because they crash all the time. The army, well now your talking with 385,000 troops, but how would they get to Australia, swim?....the mind boggles friends. BUT, now China is another matter, with 2.3 million active military personel. But China buys their iron ore from the Aussie's so if it was them they would not be able to replace their armament destroyed by the Aussies, SO WHO?.......
originally posted by: nwtrucker
a reply to: mazzroth
It is politically incorrect to point this out by any western military, BUT, the simplicity of future invasion/occupation is infrastructure....
Both China and the U.S. has very exposed infrastructure. Food supplies, transportation systems, electrical....on and on.
Knock out infrastructure and one's military is reduced to controlling the local population to avoid riots and a general collapse of the nation.
Key dams, electrical grids, ports, railroad bridges....knock those out and the game is largely over-outside of counter insurgent gambit.
These can be achieved in what(?) 48 hours? 72? Long before allies could react. Food supplies in the U.S. major cities, AT BEST, will last 72 hours. I assume not any better down under....
Not one invading soldier would have to hit the ground to achieve this.There is no effective missile defense and GPS assures accurate targeting and results.
It would be over before anyone could help......
originally posted by: Chadwickus
a reply to: mazzroth
Is this show Australian?
Australian television is atrocious, I have very little faith in it being any good, even with a good story behind it
originally posted by: TheShippingForecast
The Queen is commander in chief of the armed forces wherever she reigns.
That means that servicemen in UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand etc all swear allegiance to Queen Elizabeth herself when they join up. The oaths of allegiance might differ slightly from one country to another, but servicemen all swear to defend the Queen & repel her enemies, to obey her Generals & Officers, that kind of thing.
An enemy of the Queen in one conflict is generally her enemy wherever she reigns. Declarations of War and military orders would be issued in her name, war powers enacted by her authority. That's why UK, Australia, Canada and NZ all hang tight when it comes to defending each other & the making of war, subject to Parliamentary approval once hostilities have commenced. Treaties exist too, as others point out.
i haven't the slightest doubt UK would rally to Australia's aid in the unlikely event of an invasion of Australia. NATO would too, as would the vast majority of the Commonwealth countries. It's not even beyond the realms of possibility in this scenario that a British Prime Minister would authorise the use of nuclear weapons in the defence of Australia, so tight are the bonds.
Any potential invader should tread warily.