It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: namelesss
originally posted by: Bluesma
originally posted by: angus1745
By the way this mutilation of female genitals bears no relation or similarity to male circumcision you #ing mongoloids.
This is way off T&C's, you have a serious emotional problem.
It seems that your problem is equating apples and oranges, simply because they both have 'circumcision' in their name.
There are no health benefits that can be attributed to female circ.
No medical validity.
There are MANY health benefits attributed to male circ. (like it or not)
Your equating them is a logical error.
Although estimates of the prevalence of FGM vary, sources have consistently found the practice to be undergone by the majority of women in the Horn of Africa, in the West African countries of Guinea, Sierra Leone, Gambia, Mauritania, Mali and Burkina Faso, as well as in Sudan and Egypt.
Of these countries, all have laws or decrees against the practice, with the exception of Sierra Leone, Mali and some states of Sudan
Type I: removal of the clitoral hood, the skin around the clitoris , with partial or complete removal of the clitoris
Type II: removal of the labia minora , with partial or complete removal of the clitoris and the labia majora;
Type III: removal of all or part of the labia minora and labia majora , and the stitching of a seal across the vagina, leaving a small opening for the passage of urine and menstrual blood (infibulation);
Type IV: other miscellaneous acts, including cauterization of the clitoris, cutting of the vagina (gishiri cutting), and introducing corrosive substances into the vagina to tighten it.
The type of procedure performed also varies, mainly with ethnicity.
Current estimates (from surveys of women older than 15 years old) indicate that around 90% of female genital mutilation cases include either Types I (mainly clitoridectomy), II (excision) or IV (“nicking” without flesh removed),
and about 10% (over 8 million women) are Type III (infibulation).
Infibulation, which is the most severe form of FGM, is mostly practiced in the north-eastern region of Africa: Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Somalia, and Sudan. In West-Africa (Guinea, Mali, Burkina Faso, etc.), the tendency is to remove flesh (clitoridectomy and/or excision) without sewing the labia minora and/or majora together.
originally posted by: ShadowsOfEridu
Here's a novel idea. How about everybody keep their f****ng hands to themselves and off of boy's and girl's genitals!?!?
As for the women on this thread who are so flippant about forced male mutilation...if you want men to take up your cause you need to reciprocate. No one cares about what you find aesthetically pleasing on a man's mutilated penis.
originally posted by: BlackProject
a reply to: tommo39
I am not that up on these kinds of procedures but I get the idea of what goes on and yes it should be stopped. Any group of people who think its ok to destroy another persons body young or old should be stopped. Nut job religions
originally posted by: JourneymanWelder
these girls have nobody to speak for them. their twisted parents think its some kind of right of passage. its not.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
I don't know why it is being compared to circumcision on men, what is done to females has zero benefit and and only harms them. At least with men it can help to prevent a bad smell, especially at times when bathing water is not available.