It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RevolutionAnon
a reply to: Soylent Green Is People
I completely agree it is harder to prove negatives. Still does'nt give people the right to declare their "beliefs" as facts. The average person does'nt join these kind of debates and declare themselves "of an opinion" they speak as though they are pronouncing hard facts. Chemtrails are contrails END OFF... Says who?
The only fact here is that no one can prove anything.
originally posted by: RevolutionAnon
a reply to: Soylent Green Is People
...Chemtrails are contrails END OFF... Says who?
Yes, I am saying that those are not chemtrails. They're also well documented and not hidden
originally posted by: IronNuts
a reply to: TerryDon79
So you are saying when they sprayed agent orange in Vietnam that was not a form of chemtrail? Also in the 50's when they released cadmium in St. Louis on the civilians to simulate nuclear fallout? Granted the latter was not sprayed from an aircraft, but does allude to the point that we don't have a say in what THEY do.
Cloud seeding is also not chemtrails and they do not come from airplane exhausts. Cloud seeding is also very well documented. You also need existing clouds to seed, hence the name.
I forget if it is silver nitrate or silver iodide that they use for seeding clouds but that was being done in the seventies...Now I am not an accredited scientist but would that not be a chemtraill? If you are putting silver iodide or solid carbon dioxide(dry-ice) in the air mixed with a contrail, one might say that it is of a chemical nature. If the exhaust contains hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and oxides of nitrogen, one might say it has a chemical make up.
Now this site is meant to deny ignorance, not bath in it.
Cheers, Nuts
originally posted by: RevolutionAnon
a reply to: Krakatoa
Chem trails, to my understanding, are created by some sort of stealth flight vehicle which drops chemicals as it flys along. I don't think people are actually interchanging Contrails for Chemtrails, they are just of the belief that those contrails left behind were from SFV's spreading chemicals of some kind.
So why people use Contrails as a way to disprove chemtrail theorists is lost on me as most of those theorists i have spoke to don't regard the Trails left behind as a byproduct of the chemicals dropped.
I think it is more the location and patterns of the Contrails that these theorists find confusing, not the genetic make up of them.
Cloud seeding is also not chemtrails and they do not come from airplane exhausts.
originally posted by: RevolutionAnon
a reply to: mrthumpy
But that still does not prove them false.
.
Not at all. I'm saying that those instances were not chemtrails.
originally posted by: IronNuts
a reply to: TerryDon79
Ok, wait, why are you saying if it is documented then it isn't a chemtrail? Am I missing that a chemtrail must be some hidden death cloud above us that only lunatics believe in? Is this where this is going?
Cloud seeding is also not chemtrails and they do not come from airplane exhausts.
That would be like saying I farted in a planes toilet, it escaped the plane and mixed with the contrail therefore, chemtrails.
I was just saying at 30,000 feet if the sprayers were going it would mix with the contrail and you and I would say contrail.
If a jet is flying and in it's trail is a wake of chemicals, I, for one, would call that a chemtrail. Call me ignorant I don't care, but in my little mind that is 2+2=4.
Cheers, Nuts