It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Intelligent design theory, PROVEN

page: 10
11
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 11 2016 @ 06:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: Raggedyman

Raggedy, if intelligent design is proven, what happened to you? Somehow, you got left behind (I think they made a movie about that).

The EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE for evolution is contained in over 150,000 research articles. ID proponents, to include you, have 0 EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE and 0 articles in ANY JOURNAL.

I was encouraged, however, when I read a line in your previous post.



Well I don't, I don't claim creation a science


You are correct. Creationism is not a science. There is hope for the hopeless - do not give up!



That's awesome, the evidence is on paper?

Now you have hope in me because I stated ID is not a science, I am not hopeless

Imagine my position when I consider you and your position that evolution is a science
I give up




posted on May, 11 2016 @ 06:22 PM
link   
a reply to: peter vlar

You know Pete, when I read your comments I am inclined to believe unless
Unless a scientist has written on a piece of paper the sun is hot, peer reviewed it, you wouldn't believe it as a fact
You speak as if nothing exists or is quantifiable unless a high priest in a white coat claims it kosher for you

I read your posts and I figure that you don't use your own minds capacity, ability to think, you rely on a scientist to think for you

You need a paper, a piece of paper to validate science, that's funny



posted on May, 11 2016 @ 06:48 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

See here you are once again missing the point. Science is not saying "that the sun is hot" rather it is measuring "how hot the sun is", which does require a greater level of rigor, than understanding that heat in light is from the solar body we orbit around. Similarly making observations that we are orbiting around the star, not the star around us... that was observation.

You really seem to dislike science. That is funny, as you are communicating on a technology, brought to you by those who rely on "those bits of paper" or in reality information, accurately, and honestly communicated to any who want to see it.



posted on May, 11 2016 @ 07:01 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: Raggedyman

Raggedy, if intelligent design is proven, what happened to you? Somehow, you got left behind (I think they made a movie about that).

The EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE for evolution is contained in over 150,000 research articles. ID proponents, to include you, have 0 EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE and 0 articles in ANY JOURNAL.

I was encouraged, however, when I read a line in your previous post.



Well I don't, I don't claim creation a science


You are correct. Creationism is not a science. There is hope for the hopeless - do not give up!



That's awesome, the evidence is on paper?

Now you have hope in me because I stated ID is not a science, I am not hopeless

Imagine my position when I consider you and your position that evolution is a science
I give up


I'm relieved that you really want to learn.

Here is lesson No. 1: How to Read a Scientific Paper. In order to get credit for the course, you must pass all the pop quizzes. Let's go!




posted on May, 11 2016 @ 07:04 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
a reply to: peter vlar

You know Pete, when I read your comments I am inclined to believe unless
Unless a scientist has written on a piece of paper the sun is hot, peer reviewed it, you wouldn't believe it as a fact


That's pretty ironic coming from someone who doesn't have a single independent thought bouncing around. You're a parrot. Like a parrot, you copy and repeat but have no understanding of anything you utter. Like a parrot you take so,some else's material and neglect to associate provenience with it in order to make it look like your saying something. Your mouth moves, sounds come out but you aren't saying a damned thing that someone else didn't put there for you.

Comments like the one you make above just show how little you know about science in general, and specifically how peer review works or what anthropologists study. People like you make me fear for my kids if this is where the education system has left us.



You speak as if nothing exists or is quantifiable unless a high priest in a white coat claims it kosher for you

I read your posts and I figure that you don't use your own minds capacity, ability to think, you rely on a scientist to think for you


If you're not really a troll them you really are the short bus kind of special if that's what you take away from my posts. You're right, I rely on the minds of people who have degrees, people that were my peers, people I went to school with and people I worked under at dig sites when I actually did the science you have no chance of ever understanding.

The only priest in a white coat I rely on is myself. Unlike you, I cared enough to learn how the world around me works but in your la la land that somehow gives a negative connotation. You know why that is? Because I do think for myself.

You haven't had an original thought in any of your posts that I've read, not a single one. You parrot and plagiarize, quote sources without giving due credit. Yup... You're a real role model for the youth


You need a paper, a piece of paper to validate science, that's funny.


The only piece of paper pertaining to science that matters when I talk about hominid evolution is the one on my wall. Yesterday alone I forgot more about evolution than you will ever know. Good luck with the ignorant shtick and rhetoric. You know... The one where you pretend you know anything and that you're disputing what I've said and questions I pose yet you make it all personal. The fact that you are incapable of addressing such basic points speaks volumes about what you know and understand and the way you do respond speaks greatly to who you are as a person so kudos to you Special K
edit on 11-5-2016 by peter vlar because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 05:35 AM
link   
Ca reply to: peter vlar

You and a few others here are suggesting science is the only way a person can know anything.

That's just so funny, it borders on insanity

Pv, why do you hate science, it's a serious question, why do you hate it
edit on 12-5-2016 by Raggedyman because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 10:49 AM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman
Ca reply to: peter vlar

You and a few others here are suggesting science is the only way a person can know anything.

That's just so funny, it borders on insanity

Pv, why do you hate science, it's a serious question, why do you hate it


science is the only way a person can understand anything. you know the sun rises every morning, but do you understand why? you know milk spoils when you leave it out too long, but do you understand why? we understand why because of the scientific method and those who have applied it effectively. and thats why we continue to apply it.



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 11:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: TzarChasmyou know the sun rises every morning, but do you understand why?


Intelligent Rising.


you know milk spoils when you leave it out too long, but do you understand why?


Intelligent Spoiling.

Any further questions?



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 02:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: GetHyped

originally posted by: TzarChasmyou know the sun rises every morning, but do you understand why?


Intelligent Rising.


you know milk spoils when you leave it out too long, but do you understand why?


Intelligent Spoiling.

Any further questions?


LOL. You better copyright that before some Creationist appropriates those answers!



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 06:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phantom423

originally posted by: GetHyped

originally posted by: TzarChasmyou know the sun rises every morning, but do you understand why?


Intelligent Rising.


you know milk spoils when you leave it out too long, but do you understand why?


Intelligent Spoiling.

Any further questions?


LOL. You better copyright that before some Creationist appropriates those answers!



Lol, so funny
Why would you say that
Why would we want to appropriate that

What amazes me is how you think this is about tit for tat, I am smarter than you, schoolyard antics
You debase science with stupidity

Let's see if there is an answer to the sun rising, why do scientists say it rises, what is it the sun there for, it's purpose, not its composition, gravity holding it in place, fuel source, timeline, that's mostly self evident, why does it do it

I don't understand why atheist around here hate science, why they try and hide it from the world, why they contain it, why they are frightened to allow the world at science

Science is a new religion



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 06:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: Raggedyman
Ca reply to: peter vlar

You and a few others here are suggesting science is the only way a person can know anything.

That's just so funny, it borders on insanity

Pv, why do you hate science, it's a serious question, why do you hate it


science is the only way a person can understand anything. you know the sun rises every morning, but do you understand why? you know milk spoils when you leave it out too long, but do you understand why? we understand why because of the scientific method and those who have applied it effectively. and thats why we continue to apply it.


Has science ever quantified love, compassion, empathy, how can science
I could go on, never mind, education slips by

You are delusional, outright full of your own grandeur

Lost the plot



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 06:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

Ahh look a change in topic, when it gets too uncomfortable. This coupled with the ad hominem attacks, means you lost.



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 07:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Raggedyman

Ahh look a change in topic, when it gets too uncomfortable. This coupled with the ad hominem attacks, means you lost.


So many people think they own science, that they are science, they make it a possession, thats a sign of hate.

You say I lost, really, because you have no evidence, nothing valid I lost

Then you have TC saying if science doesnt, cant quantify it, whatever it is, it doesnt exist and nobody can know anything and I lost

Why does the sun rise, this should be good

Maybe we should go back to reading peer reviews full of possibilities and assumptions and we can call it proof, empirical evience
I dont mine either way

How about you get me a peer reviewed evolution document without the terms possibility or assumed contained within

If you cant, it means you lost



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 08:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

You seem to be oblivious to the fact that you are shifting goal posts any time things don't go your way. NONE of us are claiming ownership of science. So you are putting out logical fallacies to cover your own failures in logic.

Oh and we've explained to you that YOU do not dictate what science is or is not. That was codified before you and I were born. Don't like it? Tough luck neighbour.



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 09:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: Raggedyman

Why does the sun rise, this should be good



why do you think the sun "rises"?

scientists can show that its not the sun rising but the earths rotation giving that illusion. but of course we shouldnt listen to science and its peer reviewed journals..

so obviously the sun "rises" and revolves around the earth because we clearly see it move across the sky, and most likely there is probably some sort of God that is pulling the sun across the sky also..



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 09:48 PM
link   
a reply to: choos

Lets hope all scientists are not pedants like yourself choos

Thats for Tzar Chasm's sake as it was TC who brought up the sun rise issue, not myself.
Sure I could have acted childish and pointed out his error, but hey, its not as if we are all playing for our lives or something similar here

Its a fun little game, trying to big note ourselves above the "others", just make sure you target me not TC in future with your sniping

Tell me choos, you going to step up with some evidence, say a peer review document without the words assumption, possibility, belief or you going to sneak away, quietly, stealthy like.

Its ok TC i am happy to call it a sunrise, I am not so ...



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 10:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

well when you look at the bigger picture, one is being studied constantly, the other isnt.

but you, you know for sure that the one being studied constantly is complete BS because we cant trust scientists studying things because they are bad mmmkay.



posted on May, 12 2016 @ 10:51 PM
link   
a reply to: Raggedyman

Why should they "step up with evidence" when you ignore any that is presented? Seriously you play a game of silly buggers here with your responses. So why should people do as you wish? You don't hold yourself to the standards you expect from others.



posted on May, 13 2016 @ 01:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: Noinden
a reply to: Raggedyman

Why should they "step up with evidence" when you ignore any that is presented? Seriously you play a game of silly buggers here with your responses. So why should people do as you wish? You don't hold yourself to the standards you expect from others.


Step up with evidence that is not qualified by words like assumption, possibility, belief.
I am sure if you had that evidence you would be ramming it down my throat and doing a dance of glee proportions.
So far...

Lets be honest, you have got nothing, zero.
It breaks your heart I cant be shut down with evidence so your best argument is

"ignore, game of silly bugger,s do as you wish? don't have the standards."

My standards are clear, empirical evidence, no words like assumption, possibility, belief.

I dont think thats tricky at all, surprised you do




posted on May, 13 2016 @ 01:56 AM
link   

originally posted by: choos
a reply to: Raggedyman

well when you look at the bigger picture, one is being studied constantly, the other isnt.

but you, you know for sure that the one being studied constantly is complete BS because we cant trust scientists studying things because they are bad mmmkay.


Are you still talking about sunrises or have you moved on

I am not following your cryptic clues.

Are you hear to offer commentary or evidence mmmkay.



new topics

top topics



 
11
<< 7  8  9    11  12  13 >>

log in

join