It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sg1642
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: sg1642
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: sg1642
And why do you ignore the fact that British and American intelligence have planned the invasion and control of Syria since the 50s?
Probably for the same reasons you ignore Soviet / Russian battle plans for conquering Europe and destroying the US.
The US has plans drawn up for the invasion of the UK. Should I be worried?
No more worried than Americans are about Defense Scheme No 1, Canadian invasion plans for the US.
Well gosh darn it. Someone better hurry up and drop a jdam on Justin Trudeau.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: sg1642
You are defending nations that have admitted to planning the death of their own citizens as an excuse to invade other countries and making out they are any better than Russia. Utter tripe.
You mean like Russia bombing apartment buildings in order to blame Chechnya to create justification for invading and occupying Chechnya?
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: sg1642
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: crazyewok
The OP seems to think only the Russians are doing wrong. He keeps failing to acknowledge the West's aggression which outdoes the Russian "aggression". Invading one nation, with some sort of reasoning. The reasoning is arguable, so I'm not going to say it was right. But look at American and NATO "interventions".
Can you show one example of western aggression that was just that, simple aggression, that "outdoes" Russian aggression.
Can you spell Iraq?
What about it? Saddam was still committing genocide after Gulf 1, and the british inteligence community was telling us that he had Chemical weapons..Which last I heard Chlorine and Sarin gas we considered WMDs.
Wanna try again?
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: IAMNOTYOU
Apparently not with your comprehension level.
What part of me talking about Putins threats to NATO are confusing you?
What part about me talking about their up coming elections are confusing you?
Be less lazy and READ.
originally posted by: sg1642
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: sg1642
originally posted by: Wardaddy454
originally posted by: Tiamat384
a reply to: crazyewok
The OP seems to think only the Russians are doing wrong. He keeps failing to acknowledge the West's aggression which outdoes the Russian "aggression". Invading one nation, with some sort of reasoning. The reasoning is arguable, so I'm not going to say it was right. But look at American and NATO "interventions".
Can you show one example of western aggression that was just that, simple aggression, that "outdoes" Russian aggression.
Can you spell Iraq?
What about it? Saddam was still committing genocide after Gulf 1, and the british inteligence community was telling us that he had Chemical weapons..Which last I heard Chlorine and Sarin gas we considered WMDs.
Wanna try again?
What about it? Coalition troops were openly murdering civilians in that conflict. Is that not kind of what genocide is? So the CIA needed MI6 to tell them that Saddam had weapons the MOD and DOD sold him?
'We're going to take out 7 countries in 5 years'
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: IAMNOTYOU
and I answered that question.. Do I need to make my comment easier for you to understand it?
Putin has said he won't remain Russia's president for life and will step down in line with the constitution no later than 2024, according to an interview with a Russian news agency released Sunday.
Staying beyond that would be "detrimental for the country and I don't need this," he told the Tass news agency.
Putin said his decision on whether to run for a fourth term in 2018 will depend on the situation in the country and his "own mood."
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: sg1642
How about a Russian president who represents the Russian people. Ever think of that? They have elections coming up in case you over looked that in order to concentrate solely on one asinine theory.
In some ways the might is right is exercised among more then a few Nations through out history can both leave its marks and set the stage for new ways of looking at things . I wonder how the US would feel about parking its military Industrial Complex on its own shores and stop sailing their might is right attitude around the world as if the world asked them to . Military should be for defences proposes and not for pressuring others to submit to the threat .
Yet once again you ignore the relevant part. China is a member of UNCLOS which defines sovereign territory. Building an artificial island, which China is doing, does not create sovereign land meaning there is no territorial waters or airspace.