It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
. . .
Said Tachover: “The host was a leading TV media person and his tone was uncompromising - no maybes, precautionary etc., the tone was - there is an epidemic out there. Wireless harms and it is time for us to wake up as it is late already. He started by saying that at least 800,000 people in Israel, i.e. 10% of the population already suffer from different levels of ES and twice aired parts of my interview in which I was saying that the rates are already higher and will continue to increase.”
Two government "experts" admitted on the show that the thermal safety standard is irrelevant which is not what they told the Supreme Court, wrote Tachover.
. . .
Said Tachover: “Electro-Sensitivity is an epidemic and not three percent of the population. We are now in the double digits in terms of ES. The public must be told. Wi-Fi in schools is a disaster and as a person who spends two to four hours every day on the phone with people and children who got sick, with many contemplate committing suicide, I urge you all to be uncompromising. The truth, and all of it must be told. Continued good luck to us all and thanks to anyone out there who stands up to evil and stupidity.”
The host was a leading TV media person and his tone was uncompromising - no maybes, precautionary etc.
I assume you read further in the article than that!?!
This review showed that the large majority of individuals who claims to be able to detect low level RF-EMF are not able to do so under double-blind conditions. If such individuals exist, they represent a small minority and have not been identified yet. The available observational studies do not allow differentiating between biophysical from EMF and nocebo effects.
A number of studies have been conducted where EHS individuals were exposed to EMF similar to those that they attributed to the cause of their symptoms. The aim was to elicit symptoms under controlled laboratory conditions.
The majority of studies indicate that EHS individuals cannot detect EMF exposure any more accurately than non-EHS individuals. Well controlled and conducted double-blind studies have shown that symptoms were not correlated with EMF exposure.
I've been wondering for some time if I need to move my modem/WiFi further than the 8-12 feet it is from me usually, as I computer in my Laz-Y-Boy. And all the more so now that I have a pacemaker. Maybe I need to write the manufacturer again.
originally posted by: InFriNiTee
School ban means nothing.
Try scanning your surroundings with a friendly wi-fi microwave device that can see them. I live in an area that looks like it should "not" have much wireless, and you would be AMAZED. I have a wifi antenna that can pick up more signals from up to 50 feet away. I can access over 125 access points from my doorstep outside, and there aren't any apartments around me.
If they want to try fixing something with this apparent problem over there in Israel, they should worry MOST about when the wifi interferes with their childrens' sleep....
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BO XIAN
subtle but significant impacts on various structures and systems in the human body.
Why do they attribute their illness to electromagnetic radiation?
Which sort of relates to what I posted. Yes? The tests that show that people can't really tell if they are being exposed or not.
I suppose that they might note that when they are away significantly further distances from such--the symptoms go away.
I'd have to study up about logging into my unit to reduce the power of it. If you have a link to a good tutorial, that would be grand. Sounds like a worthy thing to do from a couple of standpoints.
It is a common security trick to create hundreds of fake WiFi networks and to hide your true one somewhere in there.