It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
And yet, you felt it relevant to say this:
actually my concern isn't "male on male" incidents.
FYI...the guy on the council that helped spearhead the first law, is a registered sex offender. Thought it interesting.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
Is it ok for lesbians to ogle other females?
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
I see what you're saying.
I just read those Breitbart reports and none of them include anything about these guys using this new law as some loophole though.
They were just typical pervs getting caught doing some illegal perv stuff like any other day. This new law didn't get them special access or anything new.
I'm not saying that it's not possible for someone to try and use it as some kind of loophole. But as of yet I still don't see an example of it.
It is not a tangent. It is more pertinent than your statement about one of the drafters of the Charlotte law.
Phage, you keep going on tangents.
And I don't know what your interpretation of "ogle" is.
But imagine for a second every state adopting a law, where any male can claim he is a female to gain access to " facilities".
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
But imagine for a second every state adopting a law, where any male can claim he is a female to gain access to " facilities".
What has prevented them from doing so in the past?
But now they have plausible deniability.
No. I don't agree that it will. I don't know if it will. Nor do I agree that the chance that it might justifies unequal treatment.
You have to agree, or must accept the logical conclusion, that a law which makes gender claims and ID more "fluid"...to enter facilities...will only increase the number of incidents.
originally posted by: efabian
a reply to: Phage
In the past you at least had to look like a woman, in that scenario you can be the most masculine guy in the world and claim access.
There are no transmen? This law does not affect females?
How come it seems that the demographic CENTRAL to this debate, are trannies (which are roughly 0.3% ) of the entire population...and MEN??
How come nobody seems to care what women and girls think, the people actually IN the facilities???
And sexual deviants stop at nothing, they are relentless
originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
How come it seems that the demographic CENTRAL to this debate, are trannies (which are roughly 0.3% ) of the entire population...and MEN??
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
But now they have plausible deniability.
No. Wearing a dress does not make one a transexual and there is no plausible deniability if a crime is committed.
No. I don't agree that it will. I don't know if it will. Nor do I agree that the chance that it might justifies unequal treatment.
You have to agree, or must accept the logical conclusion, that a law which makes gender claims and ID more "fluid"...to enter facilities...will only increase the number of incidents.
The notion that entering the "wrong" restroom is a criminal activity in and of itself is absurd.
so what...are we going to have to ask for notes from doctors to PROVE it.
Yes. Very silly.
see how silly this all gets overnight?
originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
Like you said, I think you're giving us humans too much credit.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
so what...are we going to have to ask for notes from doctors to PROVE it.
So what are you going to do? View everyone's birth certificate before they enter a restroom?
Yes. Very silly.
see how silly this all gets overnight?