It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Does anyone think that, in the debates, Hillary will be able to withstand the blunt-force trauma the braggadocious billionaire deployed to knock Jeb and his other rivals out of the race?
Trump won’t hesitate to hammer her, and everything from Monica Lewinsky and Bubba’s “bimbo eruptions” to Whitewater, to Benghazi will be on the table. He’ll also saddle her with the miserable Obama economy — seven straight years of anemic growth below 3 percent, the coal industry collapsing, a record number of able-bodied men and women out of the workforce. Millions will cheer.
In the last few primaries, Trump outperformed his poll numbers by 6 percent (New York) to 12 percent (Pennsylvania). Which indicates that — surprise — folks sometimes lie to pollsters even as they secretly admire Trump’s freewheeling positions on such hot-button issues as illegal immigration, Islamic terrorism and the Obama administration’s diplomatic ineptitude.
How Donald Trump beats Hillary Clinton
Here are 5 reasons a Condoleezza Rice VP pick would be a positive to RNOM Trump:
1. Rice was a better secretary of state then Hilary
2. Rice has extensive foreign policy resume
3. Rice will win Trump the establishment support
4. Rice is a woman so 'Trump sexist' attacks become weak
5. Rice is black so 'Trump racist' attacks loses its punching power
5. Rice & Hilary both strongly supported the war in Iraq at the time so they cancel each other out
How about Condoleezza Rice?
In a way, Condi is not only the anti-Sarah Palin, she’s also the anti-Hillary. Personally, I think she would make a great presidential candidate, but she has never run for office, and she refused to allow herself to be drafted to run for the U.S. Senate seat which Senator Barbara Boxer is vacating in California, even though polls in blue California put Condi on top. (When urged to run for Senate, she supposedly quipped that she didn’t want to be one of a hundred of anything.)
But Condi Rice could be the perfect Republican VP candidate in 2016.
Ready for Condi (as VP)
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: syrinx high priest
How are you going to call him a racist misogynist if he has a black female VP?
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: Profusion
Right-wing media New York Post is praising Trump?
Why am I not surprised?
originally posted by: amicktd
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: Profusion
Right-wing media New York Post is praising Trump?
Why am I not surprised?
Funny right, I like the racist argument though. Almost as bad as saying, I can't be a racist because I know black people. I honestly don't think Trump is a racist, but the argument is ridiculous. I'm at a point of giving up on posting anymore because it's not about facts in these threads anymore, it's about what people just want to hear.
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: syrinx high priest
How are you going to call him a racist misogynist if he has a black female VP?