It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
Assuming being gay/transgendered is a genetic and/or nuerological disorder.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
originally posted by: snowspirit
And then what else should we assume is someone broken (in need of fixing)?
And why are we assuming that gay people are broken?
Because that and transgendered( where the topic originated) are considered disorders.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
A child born with mental retardation is no different than one born with gender issues.
False. Gender "issues" are not disabilities.
originally posted by: slider1982
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
I mean should we begin "fixing" all the kids diagnosed with these disorders after the process is confirmed to work and be safe?
It will be one step away from "fixing" people to conform, talk about total control and I find the notion that people can fixed as totally absurd. The reason many kids have issues is because the system is XXXXXX not them.
As for the Gay/Trans portion of the post, at what point does a person become Gay?. Most people will have a totally different gauge to what Gay is!!!.. For some two guys hugging each other makes them Gay for others its full blown sames sex relationships with all the trimmings and you would be well placed to see that most people regardless of what they may admit will fall somewhere in a very big spectrum..
RA
Especially when recounting their childhood, ALOT turning backflips in an attempt to make themselves conform, but just can't." They were born that way."
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
No. Neither transgenderism or homosexuality are disabilities. Neither has any effect on a person's ability to function on their own.
Yes they are. They are born defects.
originally posted by: Benevolent Heretic
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
If we had the technology to "fix" them at birth (or later really) should we?
I won't address the idea of "fixing" someone when there's nothing wrong or abnormal about them at all. But, if we had the technology, I think it should be entirely up to the person to undergo any "changes" to be made regarding how they were born. The individual should ALWAYS be the one to initiate any changes to their person. So, we (as a society, government or species) shouldn't be "fixing" them at all, but if they would chose to undergo such a change, I would support them.
I mean should we begin "fixing" all the kids diagnosed with these disorders after the process is confirmed to work and be safe?
No. I feel the same way about a child born with both sex organs. THEY should decide whether they want to have male, female or both organs, as they were born. Other people, even the parents, have no right to make these personal decisions.
originally posted by: DOCHOLIDAZE1
a reply to: JoshuaCox
why waste any more money and energy on transexual and homosexual, there are plenty of living starving and missing children that our money and energy can go towards. I say let the individual choose whatever they want to do when they are adults on their own dime, and put the money and energy towards something that actually needs to be fixed.