It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

how come we dont have a real photo of earth?

page: 3
5
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: AdmireTheDistance

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: DAVID64
#1 then you don't know much about photography.

#2 Because when people want to see the Earth, they actually want to see THE EARTH, not a the tops of clouds.
I just posted an authentic picture and you've ignored it.


you dont know much about continents. They dont change sizes

Correct. They do, however, appear quite differently in photos, depending on perspective, distance, focal length, and lens used. Something you clearly have no grasp of.


what you posted was more nasa photoshoppery.

What evidence do you have of this? We're almost 3 pages in, and you haven't presented any yet.


oh please. Focal length and lens dont cause continents to appear larger or smaller on a globe. Thats proof that nasa fakes image and cant be trusted


Actually the do, kind of. Try clicking on the lining posted.




posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: ImaFungi
a reply to: clevargenuis

Are you also interested in the 2015 one appearing grey and hazy to make you believe in climate change?

I'm sure he would be but that doesn't really have much to do with the actual situation.

So why is the 2015 image slightly hazier than the 1972 images? Basically for the same reason the other images are different - they were taken with different cameras. The 1972 image was taken with a film camera, and then years later scanned into digital format. The 2015 DSCOVR image is essentially just the raw digital image taken with the on-board digital camera. As NASA explains:

www.metabunk.org...



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:15 PM
link   
if its from nasa it must be true, right?



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:15 PM
link   
2002 composite image 443 miles above

2015 single image 930,000 miles above

Could that have something to do with it? Because you are mainly referring to 2002 and 2015 because they are the ones that seem to definitively show the same general area, north america?



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: clevargenuis


if its from nasa it must be true, right?


If its from NASA it must be fake, right?



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: clevargenuis


if its from nasa it must be true, right?

Not necessarily. But that doesn't mean it isn't, does it?

What's your damned point? NASA lies? Yah, we've heard that a lot. But what's your damned point beyond that?


edit on 4/30/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
The 2015 DSCOVR image is essentially just the raw digital image taken with the on-board digital camera.


Yes but as the image presented, with the 'randomly adjusted contrast' images below, expresses they could have adjusted the contrast to make it look less like the photo was taken on 4/20.



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:19 PM
link   
a reply to: ImaFungi
Tell me, how does a "hazier" image indicate climate change? You know that increased aerosol levels (haze) result in cooling, right?



edit on 4/30/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: clevargenuis


if its from nasa it must be true, right?


If its from NASA it must be fake, right?


...since nasa has been caught faking things before, yes.

I tend not to trust liars.



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:20 PM
link   
a reply to: clevargenuis




...since nasa has been caught faking things before, yes.

For example?



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: clevargenuis
Thats proof that nasa fakes image and cant be trusted


With this logic, I could state all lawyers cannot be trusted because I lost my trial...



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: clevargenuis


if its from nasa it must be true, right?


If its from NASA it must be fake, right?


...since nasa has been caught faking things before, yes.

I tend not to trust liars.


Care to share (with proof) what things NASA has faked?



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:24 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

Tell me, how does a "hazier" image indicate climate change? You know that increased aerosol levels (haze) result in cooling, right?


Climate change is not all about warming, which is why it is referred to as climate change, and not global warming in more recent times.



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:25 PM
link   
a reply to: ImaFungi



Climate change is not all about warming, which is why it is referred to as climate change, and not global warming in more recent times.

Actually, in the current context, it is about warming. Warming causes climate change.
Or maybe you're saying the image was doctored to show that increased aerosols are causing cooling?
edit on 4/30/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:25 PM
link   

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: clevargenuis


if its from nasa it must be true, right?


If its from NASA it must be fake, right?


...since nasa has been caught faking things before, yes.

I tend not to trust liars.


Care to share (with proof) what things NASA has faked?


I've mentioned a few instances of NASA fakery in the op. start with those.



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:27 PM
link   
a reply to: clevargenuis




I've mentioned a few instances of NASA fakery in the op. start with those.

You've said NASA fakes stuff. No examples.
You've said images have been faked. No examples.



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: clevargenuis


if its from nasa it must be true, right?


If its from NASA it must be fake, right?


...since nasa has been caught faking things before, yes.

I tend not to trust liars.


Care to share (with proof) what things NASA has faked?


I've mentioned a few instances of NASA fakery in the op. start with those.



besides nasa fakery is one of THE most widely discussed subject in the conspiracy world. if you are not up to speed on this it isnt my job to educate you lmao



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: clevargenuis

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: clevargenuis


if its from nasa it must be true, right?


If its from NASA it must be fake, right?


...since nasa has been caught faking things before, yes.

I tend not to trust liars.


Care to share (with proof) what things NASA has faked?


I've mentioned a few instances of NASA fakery in the op. start with those.



I guess you missed the part where I said with proof?

Anyone can say something. It's up to you to prove it.



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:28 PM
link   
a reply to: clevargenuis



besides nasa fakery is one of THE most widely discussed subject in the conspiracy world

What's your point?



posted on Apr, 30 2016 @ 11:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: Phage

Actually, in the current context, it is about warming. Warming causes climate change.


Yes well this is slightly off topic, and I was 99% jesting; but 1 aspect of climate change and/or them dang pesky progressives agenda is to be mad about pollution in general; so you see the 2002 image with the lush green and blue, and then the 2015 image otherwise, and because I attempt to think of everything that can be thought of given particular circumstances in relation to contexts I took a crack at being funny.



new topics

top topics



 
5
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join