It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ladyvalkyrie
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Stuff like this is already illegal. Making a law that says men can't go in the women's restroom won't do jack squat to stop psychos like this.
All these laws serve to do is make transsexual's lives even harder. They already face threats of violence, discrimination and ridicule. Transsexuals and gays can be fired or refused hiring in the first place based on nothing more than their sexual preference. If the shoe was on the other foot, and Christians and heteros faced the same obstacles there would be riots in the streets.
originally posted by: Phage
How often have you felt uncomfortable about a transgender being in a restroom with you? When did you start worrying about it?
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: SlapMonkey
Men attack women in empty elevators and parking lots as well. Shouldn't we ban men from getting into elevators and parking lots so we don't give predators a legal way to harm women?
Laws allowing transgender people to use the restroom of their identified gender does NOT legally allow male predators into the public restroom to harm others.
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
But how much easier is the question. I cannot imagine it would even make it any easier at all. A man who wants to assault or spy on a lady/man in a bathroom is going to be in that bathroom assaulting and spying regardless of any laws we enact. If he/she is in there doing something bad, then he/she will (hopefully) get arrested, just as it works now. If he/she isn't doing anything bad then it doesn't matter. Since he (or she), of course, is not doing anything bad.
Uncomfortable to us, yes. But change is almost always uncomfortable. I'd say Trans people have likely been using the bathroom they felt like suited them beforehand, did they not?
I personally prefer the logic and privacy of my own home. Public toilets are a necessity, but an awful necessity. I have had a distaste them since I was a small child, and it has not shrunk since then.
The places aren't really gender-specific though, are they? They're appearance specific.
No, they really are gender-specific. If nothing else, you can be charged with trespassing if a store has them labeled and you use the incorrect one. That's up to the store--as for specific city or state laws, though, I couldn't tell you.
I'm all for a better solution. I personally don't even understand why this is an issue in the first place.
Agreed, as I noted above.
The one issue with that solution is that it seems like it could make people a target for using those rooms. Still, it shouldn't be major.
I doubt that many people would stand outside of a "family restroom" and berate someone who went in there alone upon their exit of the facility. If they did, they're just generally abhorrent people, and we can't legislate them out of existence. I'm all for trying, though
Actually, there are no "laws" really discussing this, just the policy of stores, for the most part.
originally posted by: Phage
What do you think this thread is about?
In writing, it's called "hyperbole." I have to assume that you know what that is.
Single-Sex Multiple Occupancy Bathroom and Changing Facilities. – Public agencies
50 shall require every multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility to be designated for and only
51 used by persons based on their biological sex.
That is not hyperbole. That is false.
Actually, there are no "laws" really discussing this,
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: SlapMonkey
In writing, it's called "hyperbole." I have to assume that you know what that is.
Yes, I do. And I know that is often used when one's position is weak.
Here's another law, btw.
Single-Sex Multiple Occupancy Bathroom and Changing Facilities. – Public agencies
50 shall require every multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility to be designated for and only
51 used by persons based on their biological sex.
www.ncleg.net...
You saidThat is not hyperbole. That is false.
Actually, there are no "laws" really discussing this,
Accommodations Permitted. – Nothing in this section shall prohibit local boards of 2 education from providing accommodations such as single occupancy bathroom or changing 3 facilities or controlled use of faculty facilities upon a request due to special circumstances, but in 4 no event shall that accommodation result in the local boards of education allowing a student to use 5 a multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility designated under subsection (b) of this section 6 for a sex other than the student's biological sex
carry on with the picking of nits.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: ladyvalkyrie
And then you have a whole 'nother group of perverts, in this "high tech" society we live in.
Police Find Camera in Ladies Bathroom
We live in a society, and we need to weigh the pros and cons of policy and legislation...
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: network dude
carry on with the picking of nits.
You mean nits like pointing out the "allowing" of the construction of separate facilities? Which of course, requires legal sanction.
And such an addendum was required, why? As I said, was there a prohibition against doing so previously? Your argument is specious.
Actually, I was going more for the addendum that made provisions for special circumstances.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: network dude
And such an addendum was required, why? As I said, was there a prohibition against doing so previously? Your argument is specious.
Actually, I was going more for the addendum that made provisions for special circumstances.
Yup. And they were being molested by the score. Right?
Prior to the bill in Charlotte, it seems that transgender people went piss wherever they wanted and none were any the wiser.
Sevearance-Turner was arrested in 1998, when he was 20, and charged in Cherokee County, S.C., with a “lewd act, committing or attempting a lewd act upon a child under 16.”
A 2000 story in the Spartanburg Herald-Journal said Sevearance-Turner had been a youth minister at a church in Gaffney. A jury there found him guilty of fondling a 15-year-old teenage church member while the boy slept.
but in 4 no event shall that accommodation result in the local boards of education allowing a student to use 5 a multiple occupancy bathroom or changing facility designated under subsection (b) of this section 6 for a sex other than the student's biological sex
Actually, I was going more for the addendum that made provisions for special circumstances.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: network dude
Yeah. I saw your thread.
I'll say the same thing I said there.
So because something bad might happen it's a bad law? Like with guns?
Yup. And they were being molested by the score. Right?
Prior to the bill in Charlotte, it seems that transgender people went piss wherever they wanted and none were any the wiser.