 |
|
Topic started on 13-1-2005 @ 07:33 PM by onlyinmydreams
|
This is so absolutely hilarious that I'll just present the link without much comment:
www.newscientist.com...
"THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly
declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to
each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the
proposal says."
[edit on 13-1-2005 by onlyinmydreams]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 07:52 PM by onlyinmydreams
|
hmnn... I'm surprised that the people who think america is an evil empire aren't all over this.
Note, however, that the idea for the sex bomb (would it have been called 'gay gas'?) dates to the Clinton era.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 07:54 PM by djohnsto77
|
Yeah, what would the press be saying if we dropped this one on the Muslims?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:06 PM by onlyinmydreams
|
I think that was the idea: If you're fighting a force of religious zealots (Al Qaeda, for instance) and you know that they don't care about material
losses... the only way you can defeat them is to use demoralization. Though homosexuality might be secretly practiced in conservative muslim
societies... seeing Osama making out with Zarqawi on the internet would probably blow away all of their support.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:11 PM by ShadowMan
|
lol this is the funniest dam thing ive seen on ats so far this takes the cake lmao im on the floor laughing like hell we should get our troops out of
there and test that little baby out  it will be very effective lmao i cant stop laughing
"Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable."
Omg lol!! maybe this one takes the cake i cant decide lmao!! lol i cant stop laughing its so dam hilarious ahahaah its all your fault oimd....

[edit on 13-1-2005 by ShadowMan]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:16 PM by tovenar
|
and unlike most of our tek, it cant be turned back on us. Not like the atw's we sold sadam.
If they got hold of our secret stash of "gay bombs" it wouldnt not effect us. Mite even improve moralle.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:40 PM by Flinx
|
They could call it the DADT (Don't Ask Don't Tell) bomb.
I can't think of some places to drop it... Oklahoma's nice this time of year isn't it? Alabama and Mississipi too?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:58 PM by ChrisRT
|
Now to see somthing like that I'd be a grunt in the Army!!!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 10:22 PM by astral_ice
|
That and it would help when we're chasing them through the mountains  I'm sorry but the thought of a couple hundred bearded guys in pajama
pants running bowlegged with AK's, I can barelly stay in my chair.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 11:14 PM by onlyinmydreams
|
Judging by this photo, the sex bomb/gay gas may already be in use:
external image
Remember the telatubbie controversy?
external image
We all know about Bert and Ernie
external image
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-1-2005 @ 12:48 AM by justme1640
|
This quote from the same article had me laughing.
[q]Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. [/q]
for some reason all I could see was a pied piper leading the rats -- so maybe they don't need chemical weapons for that -- just pipe in the right
music.
jm
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-1-2005 @ 12:49 AM by justme1640
|
This quote from the same article had me laughing.
 Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable.

for some reason all I could see was a pied piper leading the rats -- so maybe they don't need chemical weapons for that -- just pipe in the right
music.
jm
edited to change mistakes because it is 2am and I am tired......
[edit on 14-1-2005 by justme1640]
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 14-1-2005 @ 02:14 AM by onlyinmydreams
|
Originally posted by justme1640
This quote from the same article had me laughing.
 Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable.

for some reason all I could see was a pied piper leading the rats -- so maybe they don't need chemical weapons for that -- just pipe in the right
music.
jm
edited to change mistakes because it is 2am and I am tired......
[edit on 14-1-2005 by justme1640] 
Yeah...
at the point where they are trying to create a gas that can attract wasps... they might as well just create giant monitor lizards and paradrop them on
the enemy. Though these ideas were all moronic... you have to wonder if things like the recent locust swarms in africa were a test of tech created by
this line of thinking.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 02:10 AM by onlyinmydreams
|
Well,
To be frank, I'm surprised that more anti-US government types haven't jumped on this. That being said, I want to say that, for the record, I'm
extremely disgusted by the apparent attitude behind this project. Using chemical weapons to alter a person's sexuality is horrendous and abyssmal.
This tactic, had it been used in a real war, would have been un-chivalrous and dirty. When I was joking about it, above, I was making fun of the
brains behind it as much as anything else. I truly hope that no one at ATS thinks that I, even humorously, endorse a weapon that messes with a
person's sexuality.
I'll also confess, though, that I think that certain terrorist agents... certain nation-less killers... can only be broken through psychological
intimidation/manipulation. I am not, therefore, trying to make a 'brotherhood of man' appeal to the ATS community so as to be seen as a nice
person. I do, however, think that it would be disgusting and stupid to try to meddle, by using chemical weapons, with the sexual activity of the
uniformed soldiers of an adversarial sovereign state. Suxh would be the type of dirty war that befits a terrorist.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 08:26 AM by invader_chris
|
I'd have to say this is the ultimate weapon, even if it's nonlethal.  Seriously, it would make its victims so embarassed that they'd have no
choice but to retreat in shame.
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 01:13 PM by Realist05
|
No ant-American rants 'cause the America-haters are probably enamoured of the idea.
Make love, not war!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 01:16 PM by djohnsto77
|
I still think it's a great idea. Bring on the sexplosion! Let's rock the Muslims' world!
IMHO, it may be the best/only good idea the Clinton administration ever had!
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-1-2005 @ 03:32 PM by wecomeinpeace
|
OMG, this has to be the stupidest one of all.  Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis [bad breath]",
making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians. 
Soldier 1: "Oh my God! He's got bad breath! Quick, shoot him!"
Soldier 2: "NO! WAIT!! I JUST FORGOT TO BRUSH MY TEE-"
BANG! KABANG! BANG!
Soldier 2: *dies*
Soldier 1: "Try to fool me will ya, you bad-breathed guerilla."
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 17-1-2005 @ 03:50 PM by skippytjc
|
WME's : Weapons of Mass Erections
They just drop some ground up oysters and Viagra into an empty shell?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |
reply posted on 18-1-2005 @ 02:53 AM by Croat56
|
If they found a way to change a persons sexuality then I think some religions would want this to convert homosexuals. Could this mean that there is
something wrong with them? That this is some sort of medicine to "cure" homosexuality. I dont want to be called bigoted or anything but is this a
possibility?
|
reply to this post:
copyright & usage
|
 |