This topic is in the Military & Government Projects discussion forum.  (rss)


US Military Pursued 'Sex Bomb' Research


<<  1    2  >>

Topic started on 13-1-2005 @ 07:33 PM by onlyinmydreams


This is so absolutely hilarious that I'll just present the link without much comment:
www.newscientist.com...


"THE Pentagon considered developing a host of non-lethal chemical weapons that would disrupt discipline and morale among enemy troops, newly declassified documents reveal.
Most bizarre among the plans was one for the development of an "aphrodisiac" chemical weapon that would make enemy soldiers sexually irresistible to each other. Provoking widespread homosexual behaviour among troops would cause a "distasteful but completely non-lethal" blow to morale, the proposal says."


[edit on 13-1-2005 by onlyinmydreams]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 07:52 PM by onlyinmydreams


hmnn... I'm surprised that the people who think america is an evil empire aren't all over this.

Note, however, that the idea for the sex bomb (would it have been called 'gay gas'?) dates to the Clinton era.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 07:54 PM by djohnsto77


Yeah, what would the press be saying if we dropped this one on the Muslims?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:06 PM by onlyinmydreams



Originally posted by djohnsto77
Yeah, what would the press be saying if we dropped this one on the Muslims?


I think that was the idea: If you're fighting a force of religious zealots (Al Qaeda, for instance) and you know that they don't care about material losses... the only way you can defeat them is to use demoralization. Though homosexuality might be secretly practiced in conservative muslim societies... seeing Osama making out with Zarqawi on the internet would probably blow away all of their support.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:11 PM by ShadowMan


lol this is the funniest dam thing ive seen on ats so far this takes the cake lmao im on the floor laughing like hell we should get our troops out of there and test that little baby out it will be very effective lmao i cant stop laughing

"Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable."

Omg lol!! maybe this one takes the cake i cant decide lmao!! lol i cant stop laughing its so dam hilarious ahahaah its all your fault oimd....

[edit on 13-1-2005 by ShadowMan]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:16 PM by tovenar


and unlike most of our tek, it cant be turned back on us. Not like the atw's we sold sadam.

If they got hold of our secret stash of "gay bombs" it wouldnt not effect us. Mite even improve moralle.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:40 PM by Flinx


They could call it the DADT (Don't Ask Don't Tell) bomb.

I can't think of some places to drop it... Oklahoma's nice this time of year isn't it? Alabama and Mississipi too?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 08:58 PM by ChrisRT


Now to see somthing like that I'd be a grunt in the Army!!!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 10:22 PM by astral_ice


That and it would help when we're chasing them through the mountains I'm sorry but the thought of a couple hundred bearded guys in pajama pants running bowlegged with AK's, I can barelly stay in my chair.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 13-1-2005 @ 11:14 PM by onlyinmydreams


Judging by this photo, the sex bomb/gay gas may already be in use:


external image



Remember the telatubbie controversy?


external image


We all know about Bert and Ernie


external image



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-1-2005 @ 12:48 AM by justme1640


This quote from the same article had me laughing.

[q]Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable. [/q]

for some reason all I could see was a pied piper leading the rats -- so maybe they don't need chemical weapons for that -- just pipe in the right music.

jm



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-1-2005 @ 12:49 AM by justme1640


This quote from the same article had me laughing.


Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable.


for some reason all I could see was a pied piper leading the rats -- so maybe they don't need chemical weapons for that -- just pipe in the right music.

jm

edited to change mistakes because it is 2am and I am tired......

[edit on 14-1-2005 by justme1640]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 14-1-2005 @ 02:14 AM by onlyinmydreams



Originally posted by justme1640

This quote from the same article had me laughing.


Other ideas included chemical weapons that attract swarms of enraged wasps or angry rats to troop positions, making them uninhabitable.


for some reason all I could see was a pied piper leading the rats -- so maybe they don't need chemical weapons for that -- just pipe in the right music.

jm

edited to change mistakes because it is 2am and I am tired......

[edit on 14-1-2005 by justme1640]


Yeah...

at the point where they are trying to create a gas that can attract wasps... they might as well just create giant monitor lizards and paradrop them on the enemy. Though these ideas were all moronic... you have to wonder if things like the recent locust swarms in africa were a test of tech created by this line of thinking.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 02:10 AM by onlyinmydreams


Well,
To be frank, I'm surprised that more anti-US government types haven't jumped on this. That being said, I want to say that, for the record, I'm extremely disgusted by the apparent attitude behind this project. Using chemical weapons to alter a person's sexuality is horrendous and abyssmal. This tactic, had it been used in a real war, would have been un-chivalrous and dirty. When I was joking about it, above, I was making fun of the brains behind it as much as anything else. I truly hope that no one at ATS thinks that I, even humorously, endorse a weapon that messes with a person's sexuality.

I'll also confess, though, that I think that certain terrorist agents... certain nation-less killers... can only be broken through psychological intimidation/manipulation. I am not, therefore, trying to make a 'brotherhood of man' appeal to the ATS community so as to be seen as a nice person. I do, however, think that it would be disgusting and stupid to try to meddle, by using chemical weapons, with the sexual activity of the uniformed soldiers of an adversarial sovereign state. Suxh would be the type of dirty war that befits a terrorist.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 08:26 AM by invader_chris


I'd have to say this is the ultimate weapon, even if it's nonlethal. Seriously, it would make its victims so embarassed that they'd have no choice but to retreat in shame.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 01:13 PM by Realist05


No ant-American rants 'cause the America-haters are probably enamoured of the idea.
Make love, not war!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 16-1-2005 @ 01:16 PM by djohnsto77


I still think it's a great idea. Bring on the sexplosion! Let's rock the Muslims' world!

IMHO, it may be the best/only good idea the Clinton administration ever had!



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-1-2005 @ 03:32 PM by wecomeinpeace


OMG, this has to be the stupidest one of all.

Another was to develop a chemical that caused "severe and lasting halitosis [bad breath]", making it easy to identify guerrillas trying to blend in with civilians.


Soldier 1: "Oh my God! He's got bad breath! Quick, shoot him!"
Soldier 2: "NO! WAIT!! I JUST FORGOT TO BRUSH MY TEE-"
BANG! KABANG! BANG!
Soldier 2: *dies*
Soldier 1: "Try to fool me will ya, you bad-breathed guerilla."



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 17-1-2005 @ 03:50 PM by skippytjc


WME's : Weapons of Mass Erections


They just drop some ground up oysters and Viagra into an empty shell?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 18-1-2005 @ 02:53 AM by Croat56


If they found a way to change a persons sexuality then I think some religions would want this to convert homosexuals. Could this mean that there is something wrong with them? That this is some sort of medicine to "cure" homosexuality. I dont want to be called bigoted or anything but is this a possibility?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2  >>







Find More:





Top Topics Right Now:






Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:

































ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

, ,
















ATS Server: www2.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.004 seconds
Page processed in 0.161 seconds
8 total database queries (2)









( The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC. )





thread