It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TombEscaper
Actually, it was just something funny to say.
originally posted by: TombEscaper
Interesting wording that you use. You are in the position of having to say memories are flawed to maintain your argument, when the correct assessment is that memories can be flawed. But if you would say that, it would leave open the possibility that the memories may not be flawed.
originally posted by: TombEscaper
After researching this for nearly a year and a half, I have yet to come across a skeptic who has honestly and logically confronted the CoasterBuzz messageboard Berenstein discussion from 2001. This is the "one that got away" from whomever decided to do this tampering. 11 different posters use the term Berenstein in the discussion, with no mention of Berenstain by anyone; no one correcting the name, no one saying "I always thought it was -stain," etc. For us who remember who the Bears are in another reality, this is the holy grail of proof that there is a universe in which it is the BerenSTAIN Bears who never existed.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: TombEscaper
Actually, it was just something funny to say.
Riight. Just a humorous little personal attack to keep things rolling along, eh? BS.
originally posted by: TombEscaper
Interesting wording that you use. You are in the position of having to say memories are flawed to maintain your argument, when the correct assessment is that memories can be flawed. But if you would say that, it would leave open the possibility that the memories may not be flawed.
Sadly for your word-salad here ... the memories ARE flawed. The only case in which the memories are NOT flawed is if the wild explanation of temporal/dimensional manipulation is more reasonable than that people make mistakes and that when they share these mistakes with each other ... they get reinforced into BELIEFS.
originally posted by: TombEscaper
After researching this for nearly a year and a half, I have yet to come across a skeptic who has honestly and logically confronted the CoasterBuzz messageboard Berenstein discussion from 2001. This is the "one that got away" from whomever decided to do this tampering. 11 different posters use the term Berenstein in the discussion, with no mention of Berenstain by anyone; no one correcting the name, no one saying "I always thought it was -stain," etc. For us who remember who the Bears are in another reality, this is the holy grail of proof that there is a universe in which it is the BerenSTAIN Bears who never existed.
I've heard people say Berenstein all my life. It's a common mistake. Names ending in "stein" are simply more popular, more well-known.
Your entire postulate here is that because 11 people make the same mistake on a message board 15 years ago, this proves temporal/dimensional manipulation.
Please let's have something clear between us. You are very clear in that this Mandala Effect is a point of BELIEF for you, bordering on the religious (as you describe it in similar terms.) No one, not me, is trying to take your belief away from you.
That would, for the most part, be pointless.
But as you are discussing this in a PUBLIC forum, on a site that focuses on removing the wheat from the chaff ... you are finding that people are unconvinced by your BELIEF no matter how heart-felt it is. That is not an attack on you.
That's just the way things are.
originally posted by: Asktheanimals
The basis of this is to make people doubt their own memories. Accept only what you see now, forget the past you thought you remembered (and the freedoms that went with it). More NWO crap being force fed on the population courtesy of Gaggle.
originally posted by: TheKestrel04
I think we should try to rule out the possible theories of whats going on, so how do we determine what is and isn't something?
originally posted by: TombEscaper That eye in the pyramid of yours must have selectively read my post with blinders on.
originally posted by: TheKestrel04
I found these 2 maps on google, both can be faked easily. If someone found a variety of old atlases with New Zealand to the West of Australia then you'd have to wonder how did that get so far.Then you can fly over that area in real time to verify which map is the "correct" one relatively speaking. Real is relative... Map 1
Map 2
The basis of this is to make people doubt their own memories. Accept only what you see now, forget the past you thought you remembered (and the freedoms that went with it). More NWO crap being force fed on the population courtesy of Gaggle.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: TombEscaper
Before the time line gets "changed" ... here's what you said ...
originally posted by: TombEscaper That eye in the pyramid of yours must have selectively read my post with blinders on.
This isn't "humorous" or "a joke" or "ribbing" ... you're claiming that I misread or intentionally ignored your comments. When I use the word "attack" in this context, it is generic ... the point is you're not talking about the matter at hand, or anything I've said, or any facts ... you're talking (or trying to talk) about "me" the poster and that has nothing to do with the facts here.
You can certainly emphasize what you wish. Saying "11 people" or "11 out of 11 people" make a common mistake may seem important, but the fact remains that it is still mathematically 11 people who make the same mistake that I have made, that I have heard others make, etc. It's a COMMON mistake. That and similar MISTAKES are the BASIS of the cultural phenomenon that is now called "The Mandela Effect."
How presumptuous of you to pretend you know what I've experienced and not experienced, and how illogical for you to bring that into the discussion as if it has meaning! Of course I've experienced what you're talking about! My memory is as faulty as anyone else's! I've experienced it, I've researched it, and what observable reality and facts tell me is that people get things wrong, and the Internet perpetuates those errors a million-fold.
That is the most reasonable, basic, simple explanation. It meets the requirements of every kind of logic. But, please note again: YOU DON'T HAVE TO ACCEPT THIS! This my understanding.
Keep giving examples of what you believe in, and I will give rational explanations where they exist.
Easy peasy.
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
Here's a question for the "Mandela effect" believers: if you really honestly think you've come from another dimension or whatever, where are the people that come from the dimension where the entire globe speaks Swahili? Where are the people from the dimension that is identical to ours except that "the" is spelled "theh?" Why is it always some obscure, easily-misremembered factoid that is offered up as "proof" for some kind of time shift?
originally posted by: Baddogma
a reply to: Asktheanimals
The basis of this is to make people doubt their own memories. Accept only what you see now, forget the past you thought you remembered (and the freedoms that went with it). More NWO crap being force fed on the population courtesy of Gaggle.
Hmmm... that was a "Hmmm, maybe it's..." thought of mine, too... back to Orwell, heh.
And it would be brilliant as brains are so malleable anyway and most of the "changes" could validly be seen as the usual poorly remembered semi-unimportant stuff everyone gets wrong on occasion.
Something to consider on the "maybe" scale, anyway.