It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
a reply to: In4ormant
My time is somewhat limited these days. Surprise surprise, go figure, I didn't wish to read 66 pages of an argument which which we have already debunked. If you are capable of understanding what you read then you are capable of explaining it here, if it brings anything new to the table.
Hello everyone, I am very interested to see how people respond to what another person and I have been looking into regarding a ME. This has taken the ME to another level for us. People have mentioned this before but it really never got anywhere. If you don't have memories of the human anatomy being different please don't discourage others from sharing there memories. This is all going to be controversial. We have been looking at the human body in depth for a couple days. It just doesn't look rite. The other person made a movie about our findings here: www.youtube.com... . Or Search YT for "Mandela effect the human anatomy has changed". It should come up. If you don't want to read this post watch the movie. It pretty much sums this all up. This is going to be long. I need to list all the differences we found.
Mandela Effect Human Anatomy and Bone Structure
Yes, memory slips are always a possibility, and nobody is claiming not to have them.
Many of these objectors have just flat-out refused to acknowledge this, however. In reality, they don't, can't, or won't "get" the fact that there simply are many differing levels of certainty about different things.
They equate "I'm sure I know Depend has always been Depends" with "I can never be wrong about any single thing."
Their rationale is nonsensical and tunnel-visioned, and the staleness of it now stinks to high heaven. It is more than obvious that they continue to bang that gong for the sole reason of thread drifting and pointless squabbling.
And speaking of DependS, a corporate name change would naturally be the first thing to come to mind when seeing the s dropped, but the fact is, everything from the "Depends past" has changed. If you go to YouTube to find a commercial from any era, it has always been Depend. If someone has a package stored away that they remember purchasing as Depends, that same package will now say Depend.
It's a case where someone or something has found a way to manipulate physical, tangible reality from a higher plane which transcends physical, tangible reality.
Thankfully, however, there have been small amounts of "residue" that have somehow carried over from the "other" form of existence in which we remember these things.
Maybe they are mistakes that have slipped through the cracks. Maybe whatever is doing this is not being as thorough as necessary in order to really eliminate all evidence of the other reality.
Here is a very recent YouTube video that demonstrates this. I strongly encourage anyone to watch this, and contemplate for themselves the likelihood of a reputable, generations-spanning company failing to be consistent with their own brand name on their own label. If the Mandela Effect is a "Glitch in the Matrix," then these types of anomalies are surely "glitches within the Glitch."
As for the name "Mandela Effect," I'm not big on that, because I think what is happening here is really beyond words or labels,
but that is what most people are coming to know it as due to some anomalies surrounding Nelson Mandela's death.
And, well, we have to call it something.
I have found it interesting, though, that "Mandela" is very similar to "mandala." This "effect" has metaphysical, or cosmic, orchestrations written all over it.
originally posted by: alienDNA
Reading the comments on those videos makes me wanna puke.
Straight up. If your bodies are changing, it would be sooo easy to prove it. How come noone cant?!
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: Profusion
That halloween skeleton looks like he is wearing a tie now due to the giant sternum. ....
If people dont see the changes though, they will never u derstand how wrong it looks.
It is important to keep in mind that the multiverse view is not actually a theory, it is rather a consequence of our current understanding of theoretical physics. This distinction is crucial. We have not waved our hands and said: "Let there be a multiverse". Instead the idea that the Universe is perhaps one of infinitely many is derived from current theories like quantum mechanics and string theory.
Scientists think they know how to test the parallel universes theory - for real