It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
a reply to: tigertatzen
It could be. There is the idea that many things have changed and that we're just noticing certain silly things that sound out in business and culture, but it is also possible that certain well known names and lines have been altered just so that they would be noticed. I just had a thought. A creepy thought lol But it's possible that someone (or something) is doing this to grab our attention, like a sort of universal sabotage. To me personally, some of these changes seem kind of petty, like a small child giggling while they mess with us. Who knows, the whole thing is weird
Maybe they are clues. It might be interesting to examine each case and compare them to see if there are similarities, perhaps repeating themes or something. I might try this later when I have more time.
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: tigertatzen
Care to elaborate?
You have spent over a hundred pages insisting that your memory is perfect, and that anyone who suggests that it is not is somehow attacking your character and "impeding the flow of information." Every single instance of the "Mandela Effect" is easily explainable, especially since many people have pointed out that they have always known how Berenstain was spelled, where Australia is located, and so forth. It is you who are implying that they are wrong, and therefore gullible fools in comparison to your godlike powers of recollection. Overcoming ego is the first step onto a genuinely spiritual path.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
not for me it hasn't.... and there used to be a northen polar ice cap as well, gone now, along with the north pole. So were santa and the elves mermaides?
originally posted by: alienDNA
a reply to: FlyInTheOintment
Im sorry to say, but Alaska and Russia has always been connected like that.
saw a pic of an old box that distinctly said Fruit Loops, and it changed before my eyes to Froot Loops!
a reply to: corsair00
That would account for small missing things, if the time field was tweaked around them, then hey presto! they are displaced in space time,( being reality). Its small things that turn up as OOPARTS , so small displacements could be happening all the time, but are only noticed when its something we notice. I think that's called a" Depart" and an "Apport" is something that turns up. So theoretically, if it builds up a lot of free electrons around it, then is hit by a photon source the time field should change. Causing it to depart observed reality, which neutralises the effect, so now its minutes miles or hours away, and might even be in a parallel world..
The speed of light is fixed in this Universe , the photon not only being time locked at the time of emission, makes it reasonable, as various areas of space time its flying through, should, if it were not time locked, (or time neutral), vary its speed to the observer. This cant happen, I am maintaining that if the electrically neutral photon was absorbed by the atom, it cant tweak up the electrical power of the proton, and throw the electron into a higher shell . But its the fuzzy electron cloud that absorbs it, and makes the electron teleport up to the higher shell. Then it discharges another photon when it falls in its orbital shell. Which is information about, its present atomic whereabouts. As shown in the spectral lines.
So its reasonable to assume, if the electron can teleport between shells , as it neutralises the time quality of the photon, then at that moment, it has to alter its space time to do it. Then an electron absorbing a photon , must change its local space time, if it absorbs a photon when not going around an atom, it cant jump shells to neutralise the time effect of the photon. But its time field changes just the same, so it does a time jump instead.
herefore, you were calling my ordinary faculties of memory into question
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: tigertatzen
So do you believe that your mistaken memories are the result of the entire universe changing, or just your own faulty memory?
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
I also want to add that there's a lot of crossover between this thread, and the one about 'The Control System', authored by The GUT, and centred around the ET thoeries of Jacques Vallee. If you view only the final page of that thread, you can see the sort of things being discussed, for example:
a reply to: corsair00
That would account for small missing things, if the time field was tweaked around them, then hey presto! they are displaced in space time,( being reality). Its small things that turn up as OOPARTS , so small displacements could be happening all the time, but are only noticed when its something we notice. I think that's called a" Depart" and an "Apport" is something that turns up. So theoretically, if it builds up a lot of free electrons around it, then is hit by a photon source the time field should change. Causing it to depart observed reality, which neutralises the effect, so now its minutes miles or hours away, and might even be in a parallel world..
The speed of light is fixed in this Universe , the photon not only being time locked at the time of emission, makes it reasonable, as various areas of space time its flying through, should, if it were not time locked, (or time neutral), vary its speed to the observer. This cant happen, I am maintaining that if the electrically neutral photon was absorbed by the atom, it cant tweak up the electrical power of the proton, and throw the electron into a higher shell . But its the fuzzy electron cloud that absorbs it, and makes the electron teleport up to the higher shell. Then it discharges another photon when it falls in its orbital shell. Which is information about, its present atomic whereabouts. As shown in the spectral lines.
So its reasonable to assume, if the electron can teleport between shells , as it neutralises the time quality of the photon, then at that moment, it has to alter its space time to do it. Then an electron absorbing a photon , must change its local space time, if it absorbs a photon when not going around an atom, it cant jump shells to neutralise the time effect of the photon. But its time field changes just the same, so it does a time jump instead.
There's a lot of stuff like that being posted, and it goes into speculation about who/what is distorting time, changing aspects of reality around us, and so forth. Well worth a detailed review.
originally posted by: LoneCloudHopper2
a reply to: Ruiner1978
No more Febreeze?? That's unreal because I USE Febreeze and have used it for YEARS! I have a vanilla scented Febreeze/Febreze in my kitchen right now, which I've been using since the day I first moved to this place! This is a VERY new Mandela Effect for me! Unreal...
And as before, the name change makes less sense!
The name "Febreze" comes from the words "fabric" and "breeze."
en.wikipedia.org...
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
a reply to: raymundoko
But your post was an insult. You stated that my vivid memory sounded like vivid imagination. The memory I was discussing had absolutely nothing to do with the Mandela Effect, as I was talking about staring at the Sun as a child. Therefore, you were calling my ordinary faculties of memory into question, and as it had nothing to do with the ME, it can only be interpreted as an insult. That is why I had a go at you in response. You should try harder not to be offensive. Are you going to call out everyone's memory in every thread which involves anything memorable? Are you going to call into question my memory of my dream from last night? It's ridiculous, and you really should know better. Don't be offensive, or if you are, be prepared to be called out on it. Your input to this thread has not been constructive in any way, shape or form.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
originally posted by: FlyInTheOintment
a reply to: raymundoko
But your post was an insult. You stated that my vivid memory sounded like vivid imagination. The memory I was discussing had absolutely nothing to do with the Mandela Effect, as I was talking about staring at the Sun as a child. Therefore, you were calling my ordinary faculties of memory into question, and as it had nothing to do with the ME, it can only be interpreted as an insult. That is why I had a go at you in response. You should try harder not to be offensive. Are you going to call out everyone's memory in every thread which involves anything memorable? Are you going to call into question my memory of my dream from last night? It's ridiculous, and you really should know better. Don't be offensive, or if you are, be prepared to be called out on it. Your input to this thread has not been constructive in any way, shape or form.
I have probably repeated this a dozen times in this thread, but it doesn't seem to be getting through to some people. Or, maybe it has and that's why they continue to beat that old, dead horse as relentlessly as they do. Denial, after all, is not just a river in Egypt.
I personally noticed a number of these changes quite some time ago. Some fairly recently too. And each time, I was perfectly willing to dismiss it as either typos, re-branding products, or simply my own faulty memory. If Prince Rogers Nelson had never died, I likely would have continued to dismiss it. But of all the people on the face of the planet, he had to be the one. And because of my deep seated connection to him, I noticed something was very wrong, so I went looking...and found you all questioning the very same things that I had so willingly dismissed previously. If they/it had left Prince out of it, I quite likely would never have even read this thread at all. Wow. Thanks, Prince.
What these people are doing is in fact hurling thinly veiled insults and attempting to impugn the significance of anything we say, you are absolutely correct about that. The mystery is why. Only three possibilities are the likeliest reason for this.
One, they are reacting to their own fear and discomfort over the issue and are just in extreme denial and thus lashing out at others or two, they are deliberately pushing buttons and baiting us to gauge our reaction or three, they are actively trying to get any conversation about this and possibly related subject matter closed down.
What they are actually accomplishing is making themselves into an annoyance while simultaneously reinforcing the growing belief that we are on to something big here. If they just crawled back into the woodwork, we'd never give them a second thought. Smart people know this. That's why I am suspicious of their behavior.
One, they are reacting to their own fear and discomfort over the issue and are just in extreme denial and thus lashing out at others or two, they are deliberately pushing buttons and baiting us to gauge our reaction or three, they are actively trying to get any conversation about this and possibly related subject matter closed down.