It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Freija
Save your concerns for your own children. Mind your own business when it comes to decisions other families make.
originally posted by: Bone75
What if there was a prenatal treatment available to make sure the brain matches the package?
Do you think that I, as a parent, should have the right to pursue that option?
originally posted by: Freija
originally posted by: Bone75
What if there was a prenatal treatment available to make sure the brain matches the package?
Do you think that I, as a parent, should have the right to pursue that option?
Well, your "what if" is science fiction, pure conjecture and I'm not going to go there. Since this isn't even something that can be identified until it is expressed, usually between the ages of 2 to 4, "fixing" it in the womb is not possible.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: Freija
Save your concerns for your own children. Mind your own business when it comes to decisions other families make.
What if there was a prenatal treatment available to make sure the brain matches the package?
Do you think that I, as a parent, should have the right to pursue that option?
And if so, would you mind some of your tax dollars going into developing such a treatment?
originally posted by: Phage
I have no problem with tax moneys being spent on genetic research. Specifically to "cure" transgenders, that's another matter.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
Logically, it bridges the gap to introducing the acceptance of pedophilia.
Actually, no. It doesn't.
Your claim is the height of ignorance taken to the level of absurdity.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
If we were back in time 50 years, they would be telling that to you as you explained the coming lgbt movement.
Yup. And they would also be telling me that blacks shouldn't use the same restrooms as whites.
What's your point?
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: Freija
Save your concerns for your own children. Mind your own business when it comes to decisions other families make.
I'm
What if there was a prenatal treatment available to make sure the brain matches the package?
Do you think that I, as a parent, should have the right to pursue that option?
And if so, would you mind some of your tax dollars going into developing such a treatment?
Why is the plight of the transgendered being married to the struggles of open sexuality? One is the plight of children the other of adults. Logically, it bridges the gap to introducing the acceptance of pedophilia. It may be only a generation away.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TinfoilTP
No, marrying a plight of children to a sexual plight of adults is immoral. It equivocates and crosses age of sexual consent boundaries.
What the hell are you talking about?
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: Freija
Save your concerns for your own children. Mind your own business when it comes to decisions other families make.
I'm
What if there was a prenatal treatment available to make sure the brain matches the package?
Do you think that I, as a parent, should have the right to pursue that option?
And if so, would you mind some of your tax dollars going into developing such a treatment?
Why is the plight of the transgendered being married to the struggles of open sexuality? One is the plight of children the other of adults. Logically, it bridges the gap to introducing the acceptance of pedophilia. It may be only a generation away.
You just destroyed whatever point you tried to make....
You contradicted yourself...
If the plight of adults and children are not the same, then how the hell are you gonna tie being trans to being a Pediaphile?!?!
Lol
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
ally you don't see the hypocrisy in deciding a 2 year old is trans and swapping them without any difinative test, and undeniably a really crappy diagnosis rate..
You really don't see how crazy that sounds???
the first three are a sexual lifestyle where they choose how to reach orgasm other than exclusively heterosexual
"Boys on this side, girls on that side" is sexually oriented?
You don't see a problem where children are seen as adult enough to accept their own transgenderism as it is presented alongside a purely sexually orientated movement?