It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Republican presidential candidates want to cut taxes, but they don’t talk about that as much as previous candidates
One reason, Dave Helling writes: The Kansas budget debacle
The Kansas Legislature convenes this week to work out the latest budget shortfall
The Kansas Legislature reconvenes this week to grapple with a budget shortfall — again. The state’s severe revenue headaches, prompted largely by poorly designed tax cuts, have been well-chronicled in this newspaper and need not be repeated in this space today.
Less noticed, though, is the impact the Kansas experiment has had on how Republicans and voters view tax cuts, and what that might mean for the presidential campaign this fall.
Cutting taxes has been an article of deep faith for the GOP at least since 1980, when Ronald Reagan made income tax reductions the centerpiece of his White House campaign. George H.W. Bush called the tax cuts “voodoo economics,” but it didn’t work. Reagan won in a landslide.
Since that election, every Republican presidential candidate has proposed freezing or cutting federal taxes. Some — Bob Dole and John McCain come to mind — endorsed tax cuts reluctantly. Others were more enthusiastic.
But all made tax reductions the centerpiece of their platforms. And Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback, who once ran for president, toured the country promising a supply-side shot of tax-cut adrenaline in his state.
“Quite frankly, it’s scary,” House Minority Leader Tom Burroughs, a Kansas City, Kan., Democrat, said in a statement.
“It’s clear what the Legislature needs to do to create a ‘structurally balanced budget,’ which is why Democrats are fighting for a financially responsible and sustainable plan that doesn’t rely on transfers, fees sweeps, increased bonding, or other one-time dollars,” Burroughs said.
Democrats and some Republicans have called for rolling back a Brownback-led income tax exemption for 330,000 business owners, part of the Republican governor’s plan to cut state income taxes. Brownback has maintained that the state’s revenue shortfalls are due to a sluggish state economy and not due to tax policy.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: seeker1963
Chicago, as I understand it (and which is incidentally my birthplace) is also having trouble.
I am merely reporting what the ACTUAL ON THE GROUND and ON PAPER results are for Kansas's experiment.
Do you understand that?
It failed. It is a failure.
There are no windows left at which to throw stones...they're already busted.
I'm older than you, little brother. By five years.
1958.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: seeker1963
We're not TALKING ABOUT other states and other methods. We're talking about Kansas. You can keep deflecting and sneering all you like. The facts are the facts.
I live here. I was born in Chicago. I wish I lived in Colorado still (the place I went after I finally got away from here).....and I plan to return there.
ANyway - desist with the ad hominems. What is your opinion about KANSAS's experiment that our Dominionist Republican Governor (who is at our state-level what Ted Cruz wants to be for the nation) tried?
It is a failure.
Oh - sorry, does that disrupt your cognition? Does it cause dissonance for you? Yes indeedy - Kansas tried it - it has failed.
Simple math.
Colorado tried legal pot. It has succeeded. Windfall surpluses. Simple math.
Don't get screwed. Don't vote Republican.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: seeker1963
Yes, I'm an independent/unaffiliated voter. I'm a Bernie fan, actually, but have resigned myself to the way he's being buried, same as when Ron Paul was running, but Bernie got WAY MORE TRACTION.....and this time at least I know the ideas are going to be sunk in to the Millennials. They were too young last cycle....
NOW they are ready.
It is no secret that I am anti-GOP. I made this thread to provide evidence and backup/justification for WHY I am anti-GOP.
Hopefully others who are actually going to vote (who maybe still have a primary to go after today!) will rethink their stances if they can see the result of Republican experiments on a state level as opposed to Democrat experiments at the state level (like Colorado) and compare the two.
So yes, it is about partisan politics....why else would I post it?
And I don't think "just questioning my motive" is how it sounded when you talked about glass houses and mocked me for my use of casual language and insulted me about age....
Now - would you kindly tell us HOW YOU THINK about Kansas? It is a straight-line GOP Dominionist Effort that has ....
failed.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: BuzzyWigs
Sounds to me like Kansas politicians have a serious spending addiction that needs treatment. Cold turkey hurts, but it works.
I am finding religion to have taken a seat behind those who follow politics as a belief based on what is perceived as truth?
I don't feel froggy often but today you happened to draw my ire, when you put across that Republicans bad Democrats good.
Take care
"Older Sis" enjoyed our dialog!
FYI...you failed. Also, as far as your love for high taxes go I leave you with this little nugget...enjoy.