It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Chernobyl, Fukushima and the Insanity of Nuclear Power

page: 3
16
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 27 2016 @ 04:09 AM
link   
Funny thing is many of us have seen examples of futuristic and exotic propulsion with unknown power plants running them so the nuclear thing is just all that is allowed outside of those who posses these other advanced technologies.

Gotta admit it would be farked up to have the saudis flying around in stealthed craft with the black hardware in it doing a religious policing at will anywhere in the world.

I know if I had access to one I would use it to take a dump on Kim Jung ills Hair doo during one of his parades just to send him and his slaves a message.




posted on Apr, 27 2016 @ 07:31 AM
link   
I would be happy if the fleet of nuclear reactors was multiplied by 5. The scale of destruction brought by fossil fuels is far far far greater. 7 million people die per year due to air pollution. That's before impacts such as climate change, or that fossil fuels are often imported from unstable countries.

Use Nuclear 'Waste' as Fuel with the Ultimate Nuclear Reactor

Build renewables at the same time too. And electric cars or hydrogen powered vehicles.

Speaking of the Chernobyl disaster, here's a fantastic album (>150 images, often with a paragraph long description) on the disaster.
edit on 27/4/16 by C0bzz because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 28 2016 @ 11:16 AM
link   

originally posted by: EternalShadow
a reply to: mikell

What's the half-life of coal?

Exactly.


How about 4.4billion years? Coal has up to 50 or so ppm Uranium in it depending on where it is from...

So lets see... Coal gets you about 1KWh of power for 1.04 lbs

Average US/Canadian house uses 11,600 KWh per year (rounded down) So if that was supplied by coal

Each house requires 12,000 lbs a year... lets say you have some lovely coal that is 25ppm, thats 0.3 lbs of pure uranium you just scattered across the land from the smoke stack. And thats just one house... take a city of say 100,000 people, and roughly say 4 people per household... we get 25,000 homes, and if coal powered, that is a massive 7,500 lbs of uranium (and not to mention thorium) you just vaporized

Now you can say "Oh but most of it is filtered out" but the reality is, coal is really not great... and if i had 7,500lbs of Uranium or Thorium, id rather burn that in a nuclear power plant and produce less radiation dose on average than living next to a coal burning plant, and or a coal mine. and likely produce power for many many years.

SO Yeah... exactly ignorant sir.



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 06:07 AM
link   
Chernobyl disaster is such a disaster that former "evil" president Yanukovich actually went to visit the old collapsing sarcophagus.

Is it really still dangerous in the vicinity of Chernobyl NPP or is it just a retard EUro#er's prank against nuclear energy development and other obscurantist nonsense?

Is it possible that some rogue groups are attempting to orchestrate "issues" in some US nuclear power plant, to blame it on Trump pro energy policies?
edit on 30-11-2016 by Flanker86 because: c



posted on Nov, 30 2016 @ 03:50 PM
link   
a reply to: AlienView

The main part of this is the lack of objectivity of people. For a long time Radiation has been considered some kind of magic invisible threat which is a billion times worse than everything else.

Truth is that burning coil for power you must consider the health impact on the mining and extraction of said coal. Then you need to consider that coil is quite radioactive part of its black colour (other than carbon) is heavy metals, and such if you was to look at coal you would find it has good amounts of Uranium and Thorium in it itself and burning it spreads radioactive soot everywhere.

No one worries about that because we have always done it.

Same for industrial chemicals... many many many more tonnes of industrial chemicals are dumped on a daily basis than has ever been injected into the environment by radiation accidents. BUT again this is not a problem right... because we can see it, everyone is fine with storing chemicals in disused factories with little to no security or monitoring because, hey its chemicals, thats fine.

If you look at the number of deaths caused by the chernobyl incident, id not really trust greenpeace numbers. They have a tendency to take real numbers and double and triple them. While the number of deaths of related illness is quite high, what you will find is that the largest number of deaths was from suicide and alcoholism caused by how the USSR treated the people of the city that it up and rehoused. So the numbers are kinda bad either way, but to simply limp every death that happened on nuclear is a bit dumb.

Also, if you look at number of deaths per kwh... nuclear is still better... better even than wind and solar because... people are idiots and dont tie themselves to roofs correctly... because yeah, solar power... safe right never mind the horrible industrial process required to make them... no cancer causing chemicals there



posted on Dec, 1 2016 @ 06:06 AM
link   
"The Scary TRUTH About Fukushima (Fukushima Exposed Full Documentary: Deception/End Times 2015)"



"T Mc4 months ago I thank you for this post: This wasn't an everyday disaster, and the ramifications just don't disappear. It's too deep for most people to even comprehend. Much easier for the masses to think, gee, what designer bag should I buy this week....blissful ignorance wins. Yet, some of us truly see it".

Quote source:
www.youtube.com...
edit on 1-12-2016 by AlienView because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 1 2016 @ 11:45 PM
link   
a reply to: AlienView

Hmmmm id not really call that evidence of anything, id hardly even class it as a documentary. Much of what is said and much of what is shown is simply shock statements with no backup and shock photography that is largely unrelated to the event.

Did you know... normal background levels vary by about 2000% across the globe with peaks of 4-6000% depending on local rock types.

Even the weather can change the background radiation by a factor of 10 or so.

it isn't to brush off nuclear accidents as not an issue, but the main issue is that media and politicians typically know next to nothing about the actual science and spread that ignorance to everyone else either directly, or like in the case above... conspiracy crusaders who love to say the world is ending... at every opportunity



posted on Dec, 2 2016 @ 03:56 PM
link   
Compared to the otherworlders that occasionally visit our planet, who use some form of magnetically contained fusion power shields that surrounds there starships ---- Fission power is an obsolete form of technology, that has long seen it's day on this planet or anywhere else for that matter.



posted on Dec, 7 2016 @ 03:51 AM
link   
a reply to: ErosA433

"Fukushima is becoming Nuclear Holocaust !!!"



"Published on Sep 23, 2016 Original title: "Fukushima & The Breakdown of Our Biosphere". Original (part of) text - QUOTE: NEW: Fukushima Update Extinction Event Continues Sept 12, 2016 With Jeff Rense, Yoichi Shimatsu and Dana Durnford Free MP3 - Listen /h6eclw5 “Like the plot of a summer horror flick”: All along Canada’s Pacific coast, mussels are dying… Bodies are swollen by cancerous tumors — Unprecedented mutations allowing cancer to spread from one species to another like a virus — Scientists: “It’s beyond surprising” (VIDEO) /h35xxvr - END QUOTE Extra link on subject: havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.nl... Please for more horrifying links and facts accompanying this video, look at the original video on MsMilkytheclown1 on YouTube at: www.youtube.com...



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 04:47 PM
link   
Tonight Tuesday 1/17/17 on the Coast to Coast Am radio show:

"Fukushima Contamination/ Future of Technology"

"First Half: Author, engineer, and preparedness expert Matthew Stein will discuss the ongoing debacle of Fukushima, including background radiation rising and food chain contamination with no end in sight. He is concerned about how the hostile environment for journalists will discourage publication of inconvenient public safety concerns that could be costly to alleviate.

Second Half: Award-winning author of visionary speculative fiction, Alexander Weinstein, is the director of the Martha’s Vineyard Institute of Creative Writing. He'll share his wild ideas for future human interfaces with technology including social media implants, memory manufacturers, immersive virtual reality games, and alarmingly intuitive robots, which some believe will lead to utopian models for society while others fear growing dependence."


www.coasttocoastam.com...



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 05:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: AlienView
a reply to: ErosA433

"Fukushima is becoming Nuclear Holocaust !!!"



"Published on Sep 23, 2016 Original title: "Fukushima & The Breakdown of Our Biosphere". Original (part of) text - QUOTE: NEW: Fukushima Update Extinction Event Continues Sept 12, 2016 With Jeff Rense, Yoichi Shimatsu and Dana Durnford Free MP3 - Listen /h6eclw5 “Like the plot of a summer horror flick”: All along Canada’s Pacific coast, mussels are dying… Bodies are swollen by cancerous tumors — Unprecedented mutations allowing cancer to spread from one species to another like a virus — Scientists: “It’s beyond surprising” (VIDEO) /h35xxvr - END QUOTE Extra link on subject: havacuppahemlock1.blogspot.nl... Please for more horrifying links and facts accompanying this video, look at the original video on MsMilkytheclown1 on YouTube at: www.youtube.com...


You're going to have to do better than random blog posts and youtube videos in order to be taken seriously.



posted on Jan, 17 2017 @ 08:13 PM
link   
Nuclear Power is a great, maybe top ten, mind control experiments of the 20th century.

Nuclear Hot Water, let's call it what it is. The BYPRODUCT of nuclear power is steam, the real, desired product is nuclear weapons paid for by a moronic population.

There is no way that the population at large would voluntarily pay for weapons like this, devastating weapons to be used on them at some point. None. "Here mr. and mrs. smith, please send us 400 dollars a month so we can make weapons that we might use on you at a later date if we decide your politics are wrong." Good lord.

So the science community, and the mind control community, came up with slogan after slogan to turn nuclear weapon creation into very expensive and dangerous power generation. They cared so little about the waste, and obviously the population, that they have done nothing about it since day one - weapons matter, waste is unimportant.

This same group, scientists and mind control experts, managed to convince themselves, and others, that putting power plants near population centers, earthquake faults and tsunami zones was a good, clean and a positive investment. Why did they do this? Well Fukushima was the desired effect, "planetary purge by accident" notice how the other two coastal planetary bombs are now off or soon to be off. This is because only one was needed to blow up and alter our DNA, they're happy now with the endless waste pouring into the ocean. Wonder why no international effort is there to save Fuku? Bombs, they've been making them and they are not supposed to. Wonder when all those containers full of radioactive water get dealt with, when they break open is when. Wonder when Fuku gets a dome like Chernobyl? Never is when.

No conversation about nuclear "power" should ever be about power generation, as that is the Cunard. The entire topic should be about humans paying for weapon creations, weapons to be used on them, weapons whose DNA altering waste is worse then the explosion. Those same humans are also dumb enough to buy into the science claims about x-rays, and solar/cosmic radiations being worse for them then millions of tons of decaying rods with no where to go.

Lastly. That entire rant was only half true, the weapons are not for the human population. Notice how only two have ever been "used"? Why? Why with all the terrorists, all the evil doers, all the communists, the extremists, and all the other ists have we only used two "officially?" You've been duped into paying for your own demise for steam, steam, yes f*&^%ing hot WATER!!!!!!



new topics

top topics



 
16
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join