It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
One, Jones has been proven a fraud by even other truthers. He was caught Photoshopping his evedance. His evedance was sent to him with no clear record it was from the WTC site.
Five, no complex system of wires found or blasting fragments found to ignite Thermite.
Six, Thermite hypothesis so weak, even truthers have given up on it.
Seven, the hoax sample of Thermite had elements that was accounted for by building materials
Eight, Jones paint chip flaming picture has other reasonable explanations.
Nine, Thermite paint would only start a fire. Not enough force or controlled direction to cut a column.
How I'm I wrong
originally posted by: Doctor Smith
a reply to: hellobruce
You can't dispute the Jones peer reviewed papers
Science doesn't lie when properly done.
You can't dispute the Jones peer reviewed papers. Science doesn't lie when properly done. They don't dare try and dispute. Instead they hide in their little spider holes. Hoping it will just go away, but it won't. If his paper is sooooooo wrongly done surely they can try and get a peer reviewed paper to defend themselves. Unless. No. Say it isn't true.
One, Jones will not release his dust for study. Jones did not physically get most of his samples until 2005 or a later date. It seems all the samplrs were through second hand with no verification.