It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

University of Alaska Fairbanks Professor Launches New 9/11 Research Project

page: 11
44
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Then if it's explodes, then what is the point of burning. And show me where it's been used to bring down a whole structure over 100 stories.




posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:40 PM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Again what lab verified physical physical samples? Are you talking about the Jonez forced to resign from BYU because of no academic proof. Are you talking about the baised review by a friend in which people were dismissed because a paper of nonsenses got published without otherization. Do i need to remind you peer review is only ethical if done by an unbiased third party. Only one publisher reviewed the paper and the person who reviewed the paper was fired for being unethical. That paper?



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Then if it's explodes, then what is the point of burning. And show me where it's been used to bring down a whole structure over 100 stories.


Look. Nano thermite was found in all the trade center samples. It's a peer reviewed scientific paper. Show us any peer reviewed paper that challenges it. So far no takers.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:46 PM
link   
It got peered reviewed? Show me where it was considered by the majority of that scientific community as fact and the review ethical? (And not your truther community working as disinformationalists for the saudis)



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 08:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Trace elements common with building material was found. Show me where the samples containing major reacted thermite by products were found?

www.debunking911.com...



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 09:22 PM
link   
I'l go out on a limb. Burning thermite is not instianious. I would say horizontally beams would show mechanical deformities as the tried to fall while the thermite was burning. I would also guess if thermite was used on vertical column it would be welding and mechanical defects. As the thermite burned, the weight of the building would pinch the gap at some point. Might be minor cold welds from the molten metal pushing together. Thermite would have to burn all at one cut the beam in less than a second to prevent the molten cuts from being pinched together. If anything, you would think there would be frozen skid marks in the slag of some of the beams from cut surfaces rubbing together? Unless thermite burns really slow. I'm



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 09:36 PM
link   
The more I think about it. Examination of the grain and crystal structure of the steel will show if it was burnt, cut, fractured, sheered, or deformed by explosion. Just examine the edges of flaws and structural failures. Thermite by products should be concitrated in the slag of any cuts by its use? Should be easy to prove the use of thermite from slag. I would think thermite byproducts would implant themselves into the molten material?



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 11:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith




It's a peer reviewed scientific paper.

If it was Bentham they are a joke to the scientific community.
As long as you pay the listing fee they will publish it.



posted on May, 7 2016 @ 11:48 PM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Doctor Smith

Trace elements common with building material was found. Show me where the samples containing major reacted thermite by products were found?

www.debunking911.com...


Don't let them fool you. You think paint chips will have a higher spike energy release than known military nano thermite? Think a little. I don't want to sound like a know it all, but what other choice do I have when you come up with such rubble?

edit on 7-5-2016 by Doctor Smith because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 02:50 AM
link   
a reply to: Doctor Smith

I think you should think. How do you control all static charges when spraying an intire high rise with explosive paint. An explosive over spray fog drifting to any ignition source. Where do you get and how do you transport thousands of gallons of explosive paint.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 02:53 AM
link   

edit on 5/8/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 02:58 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Doctor Smith


You think paint chips will have a higher spike energy release than known military nano thermite?

Is that a technical term?
I'm not familiar with it. What is spike energy release?

What is known military nano thermite and what is its spike energy release?

edit on 5/8/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 03:48 AM
link   

originally posted by: neutronflux
a reply to: Doctor Smith

I think you should think. How do you control all static charges when spraying an intire high rise with explosive paint. An explosive over spray fog drifting to any ignition source. Where do you get and how do you transport thousands of gallons of explosive paint.


If I was going to take a guess and say explosives were used I wouldn't say spray on thermite. I would go with thermobaric devices.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 04:52 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

I'm guessing they highly technical term of jig'o-watts



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 07:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage




Is that a technical term?
I'm not familiar with it. What is spike energy release?

What is known military nano thermite and what is its spike energy release?

That is what's known as conspiracy babble.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 08:27 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

You live out on a limb, still supporting the official story almost 15 years later, and you still don't realize that the limb has been long ago severed from the trunk.

What happened at WTC was not a natural event, it was caused by human intervention, right down to the "atomic bomb went off" look of the area. Boiling iron and radiation sicknesses were not the results of office fires on the 80th floor.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 08:29 AM
link   
a reply to: samkent

Maybe it's energy with spiced rum or any other favorite liquor?



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 08:40 AM
link   
a reply to: Salander

Show me the samples of fission product? If it was a nuclear device, fission products or radioactive atoms would still be present in the area. Show me results the background radiation or the radiation of the natural building material was abmormal. (some coal piles are large enough they require radation monitoring due to coal containing natural sources of radiation.) That is an easy one to disprove. Get your samples. Verify what radioactive atoms are present. Only certain radioactive atoms should be present from a fussion event and in proportion to their half-lives.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 08:41 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Sorry fission event. Not fussion.



posted on May, 8 2016 @ 08:46 AM
link   
a reply to: neutronflux

Certain USGS samples showed high levels of Thorium and other by products of a nuclear reaction.

Satellite sensors showed hot spots, and molten iron was present for about 3 months. That cannot happen from office fires on the upper floors as NIST claimed.

Maybe you can show me the records regarding any government samples of radiation that day showing normal levels? I won't hold my breath.



new topics

top topics



 
44
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join