It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: MotherMayEye
The law doesn't forbid one, nor does it require one.
"The JoP should have ordered one because the people have a right to know" doesn't wash. There are specific circumstances which dictate when an autopsy can, and can't, be ordered. "If it's a high profile person and people who have literally no relation to either the death or the person might come up with conspiracy theories about the death" is not one of those circumstances.
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: texasgirl
Personally, I'm all for him being autopsied. He was there on the dime of so,some who had a case coming up before SCOTUS so I would have preferred to have any doubts placed to rest. At the end of the day though, his family requested it not be done and I have to respect their need for privacy in a period of mourning. Just my 2 cents.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: MotherMayEye
There's not one single aspect of the criminal code that says "if the person is famous, do an autopsy."
Not one.
Did the JoP have the discretion to order one for any number of other reasons? Yep. Is "famous" one of those reasons? Nope. So "you're wrong."
(e) A justice of the peace shall order an autopsy performed on a body if:
(1) the justice determines that an autopsy is necessary to determine or confirm the nature and cause of death;
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Prince was 57 and been in the hospital six days prior for an overdose of percocet.
Source?
PRINCE - PERCOCET TRIGGERED OD Days Before Death
Prince had OD'd on Percocet days before his death, and he ingested so much, EMTs had to administer a "save shot" at the airport where his plane made an emergency landing to save his life.