Clinton IT staffer refuses to testify after immunity deal

a reply to: MystikMushroom

I think you have the right amount of cynicism, but I also think 'they' have a record of making us believe that who we want actually does win, sometimes. Case in point, Obama.

He was clearly 'The Establishment's' choice (especially in hindsight). But people genuinely believed, in 2008, he offered hope & change and that they were CHOOSING and ELECTING hope & change over 'The Establishment.'

But they weren't. Obama is an Establishment puppet. I can give you a dozen reasons I will never be convinced otherwise.

So, isn't it reasonable to think 'The Establishment' will fool people into thinking they will actually be electing an anti-Establishment, People's-Choice candidate, again?

I think so.

I still say that it's too soon to count Bernie out. I think Hillary's email scandal exists for a reason. I think it's too watered-down for an indictment, but I think it could result in something that might explain the demise of her campaign.

Until it's over, I remain very skeptical about the importance voters are led to believe they have.

originally posted by: Christosterone
I am seriously befuddled that Hillary is a legitimate candidate for the POTUS...

Seriously, do Democrats really like her? If so, how can one rationalize supporting a megalomaniacal narcissist clearly in the pocket of her donors and hostile foreign governments who have historically paid millions into the clintons syndicate accounts....

Anyhow, if anyone on here supports her over Bernie or Trump please elaborate on why you or anybody could support a habitual liar who clearly believes herself to be above the law...

-Christosterone

A woman's place is in the White House not in the kitchen! The first woman, lesbian whatever. Make no mistake they will waddle out and vote for her. It's going to be scary close. Bernie the fascist commie is winning but it doesn't matter in a rigged election. It has to be a Bush, Clinton or mole controlled by the same people.

so are we as upset about jebs private e-mail servers ?

what did McCarthy say about the expensive congressional hearings about benghazi ? derail something ?

originally posted by: MotherMayEye

originally posted by: AmericanRealist
He is smart, he knows he will end up dead from "natural causes, accident, or suicide" if he opens his mouth about Clinton. After all, Benghazi was all about her tying up loose ends to make sure the man involved with weapons transfers from Libya to Syria did not have a change of heart about what he was doing.

It would be another body for the Clinton hit list.

If he spilled the beans on anything significant, then his testimony is on the record. What good would it do to silence him after he's already talked?

There are other witnesses.

Why does the KGB/FSB murder defectors with polonium, even after they've defected? To encourage the others.

Why isn't there a Russian Snowden? Their electronic espionage is at least as aggressive as the NSA's (they don't have the NSA's money and infrastructure, but their hackers are probably better and they are less restrained).

The FBI already has information from Pagliano. It would just complicate things and jeapordize the investigation if he testified before Congress. He was right to refuse. Congress was wrong to ask at this point.

Source: Clinton IT specialist revealing server details to FBI, 'devastating witness'

Former Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano, a key witness in the email probe who struck an immunity deal with the Justice Department, has told the FBI a range of details about how her personal email system was set up, according to an intelligence source close to the case who called him a “devastating witness.”

The source said Pagliano told the FBI who had access to the former secretary of state’s system – as well as when – and what devices were used, amounting to a roadmap for investigators.

"Bryan Pagliano is a devastating witness and, as the webmaster, knows exactly who had access to [Clinton's] computer and devices at specific times. His importance to this case cannot be over-emphasized," the intelligence source said.

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
so are we as upset about jebs private e-mail servers ?

what did McCarthy say about the expensive congressional hearings about benghazi ? derail something ?

It probably stems from the fact that when Jeb was Secretary of State.... Oh that's right, he wasn't.
He was the Governor of Florida..... Privy to all sorts of Top Secret information, no doubt.

There are persuasive opinions that suggest both Pagliano and Guccifer will be appearing before a Federal Grand Jury.

To have the IT guy and the Hacker both giving evidence means more than one "suicides" are going to be needed before Mrs.Clinton can make it back to the White House.

Perhaps nobody will suspect the coincidence?

The Clinton "Suicide" Machine Vs The FBI ?