A few perspectives on this on the same page here, some pro-US, some anti:
www.informationwar.org...
"The report highlights the role of Mr Annan, who was head of UN peacekeeping at the time, sharply criticising
his failure to act on a warning of the risk of genocide sent by the head of the UN peacekeepers in Rwanda."
A clear signal of imminent danger, not responded to. Result: genocide. Global failure.
Trying to see the same quality of intelligence related to clear and present danger of WMDs to national security of US. Not there. Bad intelligence.
Old news. Faked documents. Lies. Obfuscation. Corruption. Death and destruction. PNAC. Oil.
It's not the same for me. But I can see why you would want to use an anti-UN argument in your effort to justify US unilateral action.