It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Canada to introduce pot legalization legislation in 2017

page: 2
17
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 20 2016 @ 10:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: DBCowboy

Deadpool is Canadian.


Um. That's this guy:

<





posted on Apr, 20 2016 @ 10:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: DBCowboy

Deadpool is Canadian.


He just balances the scales for Justin Beiber.



posted on Apr, 20 2016 @ 10:57 PM
link   
a reply to: intrepid

Oh I'm well aware.



posted on Apr, 20 2016 @ 10:59 PM
link   
a reply to: Swills

I get confused about the different marijuana laws. Would this mean that marijuana would be legal but only sold by the government? Would it be illegal to grow? What are the laws concerning marijuana now in Canada? I heard something like you can carry weed as long as it's under a certain amount? I don't expect you to answer these questions; I'm just sharing what I'm wondering about. I know I need to do my own research.

I get all of my Canadian marijuana information from the Trailer Park Boys. :/ Ricky, Julian, and Bubbles are going to be so upset if this goes though!

But seriously, I need to become more informed. I'm curious about the details of legalization.



posted on Apr, 20 2016 @ 11:58 PM
link   
Don't hold your breath.....id say the work this arse will do to legalize pot is mostly to make sure his political cronies get the lions share of the production/distribution licences...,.that is where the money will be....
This is a big plu,m for some people and they wont be ordinary pot heads...
I am disgusted with the hipocritical barstids....
Politicians?
We don't needs no stinking politicians....



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 09:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

C'mon. We ALL know that legal pot won't happen until Uncle Sam says we can. Pierre would have flipped the Bird at Washington. Justin? He's his mother's child. He'll play nice.



By nicely do you mean mentally deranged? The woman has serious psychological issues and that can be passed on in the genes. Justin has a high probability of being just as crazy IMHO.

Cheers - Dave



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 09:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Well that's a bummer. I was presently surprised there's a 2017 date! I couldn't imagine what a sitting president would have to do to legalize pot in the US on a federal level. Just thinking about attempting to do it as prez already gives me a headache.

But, I do not trust any banker ties. What are his son's connections, I mean besides his father, does he work with the Big Banks and support their shenanigans? You know, like US politicians do?


Of course he supports big banks, otherwise he would have tackled the primary problem first, that being re-nationalizing the bank of canada and dissolving the IMF debt. Just because every pm from his father onward has committed treason doesn't mean it's right. As an allegedly autonomous nation it would be treason to had over financial and exotic control of a nation to foreign nationals. The same applies in the US with the fed.

Pot is a diversion issue and has been set in the future to keep eyes and minds of any new draconian measures to be introduced. Something like bill c36 followed by the diversion of prorogation and the the subsequent passing of the same bill under c6. All smoke, mirrors and BS.

Cheers - Dave



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 09:51 AM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
Maybe you should provide some proof of your claims.

The Bank of Canada is a 100% Crown Corporation, with 100% of the ownership shares 'owned' (on behalf of the Monarchy of Canada and the Canadian Federal Government) by the sitting Minister of Finance.

It is precisely 0% 'private'.

The only thing that come close to 'smoke and mirrors' are your claims about the Canadian Government and Canada's sovereignty.



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 09:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: paperdoll
I get confused about the different marijuana laws. Would this mean that marijuana would be legal but only sold by the government? Would it be illegal to grow? What are the laws concerning marijuana now in Canada? I heard something like you can carry weed as long as it's under a certain amount? I don't expect you to answer these questions; I'm just sharing what I'm wondering about. I know I need to do my own research.

I get all of my Canadian marijuana information from the Trailer Park Boys. :/ Ricky, Julian, and Bubbles are going to be so upset if this goes though!

But seriously, I need to become more informed. I'm curious about the details of legalization.

None of this is known yet. The reason the Liberals are waiting a year is precisely to sort this all out before making any hasty legal changes. Well, that, and to give us enough time to amend all of the pertaining treaties in the formats laid out by those treaties.

The current word is that sale for profit will be highly regulated, and personal growth/usage will be treated similar to tobacco. I can legally grow as much tobacco as I wish as long I do not distribute to any person under 18, sell for profit, or conflict with any local bylaws (only a concern if you are growing a lot or live in a very tight area).



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 11:27 AM
link   
a reply to: elementalgrove

Look like Western Australia is coming out of the Dark Ages as well

www.watoday.com.au...


He said it looked as if the Australian system could be very similar to the Canadian system in terms of its licensing scheme, a market where MMJ PhytoTech was already engaged. MMJ PhytoTech already has operations in British Columbia, Canada and is currently selling its products in Europe. "We know the Canadian licensing system so we are very well positioned to be on the front foot as Australian regulation evolves," he said.



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 03:36 PM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Damn really, he's in the pocket of the elite, basically? I have no idea how politics work in Canada but do your politicians cater the wealthy and beg for campaign monies, even give private speeches for big bucks?

I totally agree the pot thing could be a diversion but a very welcome one! Better than a violence diversion!



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: peck420

Oh really? Well things just got interesting around here! What's your thoughts on the new PM?



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 03:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: intrepid
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

C'mon. We ALL know that legal pot won't happen until Uncle Sam says we can. Pierre would have flipped the Bird at Washington. Justin? He's his mother's child. He'll play nice.



Can we stop this one, please? The US is kowtowing to the UN on this issue presently. The days of the US dictating international drug policy are actually twilighted. The states in the US which have decriminalized and even legalized, have seen more pressure from the UN towards DC to intervene and reinstate the old laws than we've seen from DC on it's own volition by far.



posted on Apr, 21 2016 @ 10:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: peck420
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
Maybe you should provide some proof of your claims.

The Bank of Canada is a 100% Crown Corporation, with 100% of the ownership shares 'owned' (on behalf of the Monarchy of Canada and the Canadian Federal Government) by the sitting Minister of Finance.

It is precisely 0% 'private'.

The only thing that come close to 'smoke and mirrors' are your claims about the Canadian Government and Canada's sovereignty.


There is so much info out there. Let's start with the BOC and legal actions with their own links....

B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info chriswick.ca/who-changed-the-bank-of-canadas-policies-in-1974-and-why
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info
B.O.C. Info

Governor Generals of the BOC

B.O.C. Info

Notice most post 74 governor generals have ties to, or are, Bilderbergers, the Trilateralist Commission, the IMF, Goldman Sachs, etc. ;-)

Definition of a Colony

Defintion of a Colony

Colony - any people or territory separated from but subject to a ruling power.


Who is the ruling power?

CIA World FactBook-Canada

Executive branch: chief of state: Queen ELIZABETH II (since 6 February 1952); represented by Governor General Michaelle JEAN (since 27 September 2005)


And what is a Prime Minister

Definition

Well, there's some interesting reading ;-)

Cheers - Dave



posted on Apr, 22 2016 @ 12:35 AM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle

Not to mention the NEP and why french is on the back of our cereal boxes.
Who are these private banks we borrow from anyway that we now owe trillions to?
I don't think JTwould have started legalizing pot till year 41/2 but a Federal court judge told the government had 6 months to come up with something that was not infringing on the rights medical personal growers
But he does have great hair



posted on Apr, 22 2016 @ 12:58 AM
link   
Trudeau is quite a "character", he boxes too:

www.youtube.com...



posted on Apr, 22 2016 @ 08:05 AM
link   
a reply to: bobs_uruncle
As I thought, nothing but a poor understanding of, well, everything.
I ask for evidence, and all I get are opinions.

As for the Queen...you must mean the Queen of Canada....you know, the one that fulfills the Monarchy portion of our Constitutional Monarchy.

Or can only us plebs hold two titles concurrently?

The only thing interesting about your posts are the level of delusion.

How about you start with actual sources...like, I don't know...the Bank of Canada Act. You know, the actual law surrounding it.



posted on Apr, 22 2016 @ 08:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: Swills
Oh really? Well things just got interesting around here! What's your thoughts on the new PM?

So far, meh. Could be better, but could be significantly worse.

He is young and idealistic, which is good. But, he is young and inexperienced, which is not great.

I like that, so far, regardless of how bad or good the news, he appears to try to keep Canada unified, as opposed to being divisive.

All in all, I will give him his 4 before I make my final decision on him.



posted on Apr, 22 2016 @ 08:09 AM
link   
a reply to: fernalley

NEP was a bad policy affected by worse times.

NEP without a crash would have worked.

The crash without NEP would have been substantially easier to ride out.

As for our federal debt, approx 28% is held by foreign banks...the rest is owed to Canadians.



posted on Apr, 22 2016 @ 09:21 AM
link   
a reply to: Swills

If you get bored:

TrudeauMetre

Keeps tabs on the promises made and what is going on with them.




top topics



 
17
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join