It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Iran must pay nearly US$2 billion in compensation to relatives of the 241 Marines who died in a 1983 terrorist attack in Beirut, as well as victims of other attacks that courts have linked to Tehran.
On Wednesday, the court ruled that Congress had acted within its powers when it passed a law in 2012 that granted victims involved in the case the right to be paid for their losses out of frozen funds tied to Iran’s central bank.
The legislation stated that the bank’s assets within the US were to be turned over to the families of the victims.
Iran's central bank tried to stave off court orders at the time, complaining that US Congress was intruding into the business of federal courts when it passed the legislation, according to AP.
originally posted by: FamCore
Does anyone think the US Supreme Court's decision will carry ANY weight in Iran?
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: intrptr
Exactly - I laughed just reading the title. Does anyone think the US Supreme Court's decision will carry ANY weight in Iran? Their treasury department goesn't give a f***, just imagine if Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, or a hundred other countries we've pissed off "determined" that the U.S. owed them money.
This is the stupidest use of time and energy by our "justice system" representatives - do your damn jobs scumbags - they love to make it look like they're working so hard for us lol ok guys…
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
People mocked it, but this is exactly why Saudi Arabia threatened to sell off its assets in America.
originally posted by: xuenchen
The U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling today about claims rising from the 1983 attack in Lebanon that killed 241 Marines.
Looks like the Court says Iran must pay.
Obama is a little upset and has (allegedly) said this could lead to many lawsuits against U.S. interests.
The Court says that Congress had acted within its powers when it passed a law in 2012.
Always a conflict somewhere whether it's on a battlefield or a courtroom.
US Supreme Court rules Iran must pay almost $2bn to victims of 1983 terror attacks
BANK MARKAZI, AKA CENTRAL BANK OF IRAN v. PETERSON ET AL.
The US Supreme Court has ruled that Iran must pay nearly US$2 billion in compensation to relatives of the 241 Marines who died in a 1983 terrorist attack in Beirut, as well as victims of other attacks that courts have linked to Tehran.
On Wednesday, the court ruled that Congress had acted within its powers when it passed a law in 2012 that granted victims involved in the case the right to be paid for their losses out of frozen funds tied to Iran’s central bank.
The legislation stated that the bank’s assets within the US were to be turned over to the families of the victims.
Iran's central bank tried to stave off court orders at the time, complaining that US Congress was intruding into the business of federal courts when it passed the legislation, according to AP.
of *course* Iran denied responsibility for the attacks
Many of the bodies found had been severely mutilated. Many boys had been castrated, some were scalped...[71]
Janet Lee Stevens, an American journalist, later wrote to her husband, Dr. Franklin Lamb, "I saw dead women in their houses with their skirts up to their waists and their legs spread apart; dozens of young men shot after being lined up against an alley wall; children with their throats slit, a pregnant woman with her stomach chopped open, her eyes still wide open, her blackened face silently screaming in horror; countless babies and toddlers who had been stabbed or ripped apart and who had been thrown into garbage piles."[72]
President Obama’s administration supported the families in the case, despite his outspoken opposition to legislation that could allow the relatives of 9/11 victims to sue Saudi Arabia for alleged links to the tragedy.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
originally posted by: FamCore
Does anyone think the US Supreme Court's decision will carry ANY weight in Iran?
Why would it have to? The judgement was against Iranian assets frozen inside the United States.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: enlightenedservant
People mocked it, but this is exactly why Saudi Arabia threatened to sell off its assets in America.
Then Americans can buy those.
Might be better?