It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Kendall Jenner Worried Caitlyn Is Not Her Father After Kris' Fling With Soccer Star

page: 2
7
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:09 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?


You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.


So I'm correct that the law made it true that slaves were sub-human? Really?

And you think Christians are guilty of magical thinking ... Tell me, if Congress passes a law that decrees the sky to be yellow tomorrow, would you start demanding we all declare it to be so? Or would you actually think you see a yellow sky?

I guess I have my "Big Sky Daddy" and you have your "Big DC Daddies" ...




posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: Sargeras

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: frostjon361
a reply to: reldra

As I stated, I'm not supportive of the source. But the phrasing, the implications come across as just plain silly regardless of the "truth". Legal recognition of a person's biological gender doesn't seem to match up properly in my head. The biological parts you are born with are the defining factor on sexuality and gender. I realize my opinion is not a popular one with today's special snowflakes.


It doesn't need to match up properly in your head. Popularity is not the issue either. It is accepting what is the law.


It is not a law, that I have to treat a mentally ill man as a woman because he says so!!!

What next, we have to agree the crazy guy on the corner with a sign that reads " I am Jesus!! " is Jesus because he says so?

The fact is Bruce is a man, period!!!

This isn't somthing one gets to decide, just like you don't have wings because you think your are a bird, and can't breathe water because you say you are a fish!!

By your logic I am Barrack Hussein Obama because I say so....

Is it really so hard to see how stupid this train wreck of a thought process is?


She is legally a female.


He is biologically, physically, and factually a man!!

So is changing your sex like legally changing your name?

Just pay a few dollars and it's done?

But yes that proves it right?

How about we use logic, reasonable judgement, and science?

Y chromosome confirmed!!

Hell is in fact a man!!!

Lol, just stop, every time you type you make your position even more rediculous!!



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:21 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?


You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.


So it is injustice that he is a man, with a mental disorder?

Hey guess what, it is unjust that I am not a billionaire!!

I said it, that makes it a fact!!!

Or does that only work for your prefered mental conditions?



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?


You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.

Conservative policy corrected the liberal slave trade



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:33 PM
link   

originally posted by: visitedbythem

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?


You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.

Conservative policy corrected the liberal slave trade


Brought to you by the KKK starting Jim Crowe touting tolerant left!
edit on 19-4-2016 by Sargeras because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:34 PM
link   
a reply to: frostjon361

Wow, is this ever dumb and certainly not worthy of being an ATS thread. DNA is DNA, Bruce or Caitlyn it matters not, he's male. You can't argue with nature.

Cheers - Dave



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:35 PM
link   

originally posted by: bobs_uruncle
a reply to: frostjon361

Wow, is this ever dumb and certainly not worthy of being an ATS thread. DNA is DNA, Bruce or Caitlyn it matters not, he's male. You can't argue with nature.

Cheers - Dave


Exactly!!!



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:40 PM
link   
a reply to: reldra

OK I was trying to summarize, if you are biologically born a male you are a male case closed. Period. If you are born black or Asian that's who you are. You can't alter your DNA to make you a female. You cant mutilate your genitals it won't make you ovulate. Tell me where I'm wrong? You won't make it it in the world if you are so basically devoid of common sense and basic biology.
edit on 1952016xApril000000Tuesday19America/ChicagoTue, 19 Apr 2016 22:41:46 -0500 by BoxFulder because: expansion of thought



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sargeras

originally posted by: visitedbythem

originally posted by: reldra

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: reldra

Yes, and once upon a time slaves were legally subhuman and property, too. Did that make it true?


You are correct. So, that injustice was fixed. Now, another injustice has been fixed.

Conservative policy corrected the liberal slave trade


Brought to you by the KKK starting Jim Crowe touting tolerant left!


That is correct. KKK was Liberals. Hard to swallow for some these days



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:41 PM
link   
Oh come on, this was just lazy ramble & run posting, OP. If you're going to post a link, make sure you read through your ramblings after you hit the post button so you can fix dud links.

Here's the OP's busted link, fixed.
And if you don't feel like flipping through a slideshow, here's RadarOnline

Point of the article being Kris Jenner was basically a ho sleeping around, ergo the kid's paternity is in question. Exactly why this merits an anti-transgender rage-fit is beyond me, but geez, go snarf some chocolate or something & cool it.



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:43 PM
link   
a reply to: BoxFulder
Come om folks, Michael Jackson was born a Black male, and died a white female



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:45 PM
link   

originally posted by: BoxFulder
a reply to: reldra

OK I was trying to summarize, if you are biologically born a male you are a male case closed. Period. If you are born black or Asian that's who you are. You can't alter your DNA to make you a female. You cant mutilate your genitals it won't make you ovulate. Tell me where I'm wrong? You won't make it it in the world if you are so basically devoid of common sense and basic biology.

You do know women are born with all the eggs we'll ever have to reproduce with, and there's some women born with zero eggs and thus do not ever ovulate, right? To ovulate means to release an egg. When there are none to be released, they generally call it "sterility". Are you therefore saying sterile women who don't ovulate aren't actually women?



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:45 PM
link   
OMG the Kardashians have made their way onto ATS

*slowly backs away*



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:47 PM
link   
a reply to: [post=20622854]Nyiah[/postno but they have x chromosomes and a vagina so they are you know female. Nice try. You have no argument. Sex is not determined in your mind its actually encoded in your DNA. I'm short if I go around telling people I'm tall will that make me tall?
edit on 2022016xApril000000Tuesday19America/ChicagoTue, 19 Apr 2016 22:51:32 -0500 by BoxFulder because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:52 PM
link   
a reply to: visitedbythem

Reminded me of the one line joke. "only in American can you be born a poor black man and die a rich white woman"
edit on 2032016xApril000000Tuesday19America/ChicagoTue, 19 Apr 2016 22:52:57 -0500 by BoxFulder because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 10:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: BoxFulder
a reply to: [post=20622854]Nyiah[/postno but they have x chromosomes and a vagina so they are you know female. Nice try. You have no argument. Sex is not determined in your mind its actually encoded in your DNA. I'm short if I go around telling people I'm tall will that make me tall?

:facepalm: Just like with guys born without a penis, there's plenty of cases of women born without their reproductive organs, partially or entirely, too. Do a little browsing on Mayer-Rokitansky-K üster-Hauser syndrome.

It's pretty clear to me that you're very hung up on the physical more than the genetics, because you keep shoving your foot down your throat regarding them.



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 11:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: frostjon361

The link won't load. But regardless, 1) OK! magazine is a tabloid 2) The rest of your ranting has nothing to do with the matter at hand.

Caitlyn jenner is a female, first name Caitlyn. It says so on her identification. It is legally recognized. Whether you prefer to recognize it or not, it is true.


Oh, come on.

You can't actually believe that rubbish.

Silly.



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 11:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Nyiah

Grabbing at straws; regardless, born with a penis you are a man. You can cut it off, invert it into looking like a vagina, get breast implants, wear a skirt, etc. You are still a man regardless whatt you think in your mind. If you are Chinese all the plastic surgery in the world can't change your genetics . You have no argument still. Everyone is to PC to say what it is, a mental illness.



posted on Apr, 19 2016 @ 11:19 PM
link   
a reply to: visitedbythem

classroom.synonym.com...

The term "Democrat" in American politics extends back to the founding era when Thomas Jefferson and other anti-Federalists, or supporters of a small central government, began calling themselves Democratic-Republicans in 1798. Always disjointed by factions, in 1828 then-candidate Andrew Jackson unified and renamed the party the Democrats

The democrats and dixiecrats of old were hardly left wing.
I know it is hard to swallow for some that the labels we use today aren't the same as they were back in the day.
But hey I am sure that won't stop you from saying it in the future.



posted on Apr, 20 2016 @ 12:22 AM
link   

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: visitedbythem

classroom.synonym.com...

The term "Democrat" in American politics extends back to the founding era when Thomas Jefferson and other anti-Federalists, or supporters of a small central government, began calling themselves Democratic-Republicans in 1798. Always disjointed by factions, in 1828 then-candidate Andrew Jackson unified and renamed the party the Democrats

The democrats and dixiecrats of old were hardly left wing.
I know it is hard to swallow for some that the labels we use today aren't the same as they were back in the day.
But hey I am sure that won't stop you from saying it in the future.
And how do you think Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, Adams, and Washng would react to Socialists, and Communists? Got a clue?



new topics

top topics



 
7
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join