It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Elliott Williams spent the last five days of his life in a Tulsa County jail, paralyzed and lying on the cold concrete floor. But despite the 37-year-old Oklahoma man’s pleas for help, guards did nothing to save him, a lawsuit claims. At one point, jailers dumped Williams’s limp body into a shower and left him there for an hour. The dying inmate “would not stand up but we did give him a shower anyway,” a captain later testified, according to a sheriff’s office internal report. Another officer saw Williams face down in the shower, screaming, “Help me!” according to the internal report. In the days that followed, Williams’s father tried in vain to contact his son. He was denied visitation “because of Elliott’s condition.” “He’s acting like he’s paralyzed, but we know he’s not,” a mental-health worker told Williams’s dad, court papers allege. Detention officers, nurses and even a jail psychiatrist accused Williams of “faking” an illness. His family says they declined to administer medical care or transport Williams to a hospital—until it was too late. Cops arrested the Army vet, who had a history of mental illness, at a Marriott hotel on Oct. 21, 2011. Hotel staff called the cops after Williams, who was with his parents, appeared to have a mental breakdown in the lobby. At the time, his only alleged crime was misdemeanor obstruction. But he paid with his life. “This guy went almost six days and never got taken to the hospital with a broken neck,” Daniel Smolen, an attorney for Williams’s family, told The Daily Beast. “They’re throwing food at him and making fun of him in the cell while he’s going through a horrific death. You wouldn’t do that to an animal or any living thing.”
www.thedailybeast.com... paign=Feed%3A+thedailybeast%2Farticles+%28The+Daily+Beast+-+Latest+Articles%29
volunteer deputy, 74-year-old Robert Bates, fatally shot an unarmed black man at close range after mistaking his gun for a Taser.
I took from it either a injury was caused during arrest of as a action as part of his breakdown.
originally posted by: LifeisGrand
a reply to: Spider879
When he was arrested he walked in I am guessing. Otherwise they would have known he was already paralyzed? How he did get injured in jail? Something is't being told here.
When Williams arrived to the county jail’s booking area in the early morning of Oct. 22, Owasso officer Jack Wells slammed him to the floor while trying to handcuff him, according to the cop's own interview with OSBI. Officer Wells told OSBI he “landed on top of Elliott’s shoulder and head,” but that the prisoner “appeared to be fine with no injuries.”
Still, the Tulsa sheriff office’s appeared to disagree. In an internal report, the sheriff’s department says Williams struggled after the fall, and that his condition was captured on booking cameras. “At this time it is obvious that Williams is having a difficult time standing,” the document stated.
Sheriff Glanz himself later testified that his investigators, after watching surveillance video, were concerned Williams had broken his neck.
“This guy went almost six days and never got taken to the hospital with a broken neck,” Daniel Smolen, an attorney for Williams’s family, told The Daily Beast. “They’re throwing food at him and making fun of him in the cell while he’s going through a horrific death. You wouldn’t do that to an animal or any living thing.”
Sheriff Glanz himself later testified that his investigators, after watching surveillance video, were concerned Williams had broken his neck.
You need standard practices and standard procedures across every state. Most of all, you need a proper Police Complaints procedure run by members of the public who are charged with asserting guilt and punishment, and when a problem like this affects everyone in a department, that department needs to be ripped apart and replaced by something else.
originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
The last is the most interesting response. The implication is that "some people" "deserve" to be tortured or mistreated and that such behavior is not only reasonable, but "right" in the context of "certain crimes." No one is sure where the line is, but everyone feels like they can spot it if they need to.
originally posted by: intrptr
Well just march into that prison and inflict better standards. In the police, courts, judges, lawyers, law makers, prisons, guards…?
originally posted by: intrptr
You'd need an army and then that army would abuse everyones rights, given the ultimately corruptible power as you describe.
originally posted by: intrptr
Tear it all up and rebuild, huh? Form new organizations with even more rigorous procedures and standards…
originally posted by: intrptr
Nice, but unsure how you plan to carry this out.
Maybe muster the National Guard?