It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Azureblue
Um, couple of points I should tell you.
Most cancers don't effect reproduction.
The population has been going up, not down (even though the increase has slowed).
So the idea that cancer is about population control makes about as much sense as "happy thoughts" curing cancer.
originally posted by: BO XIAN
Written by Arjun Walia
www.newearth.media...
.
“Have you ever wondered why, despite the billions of dollars spent on cancer research over many decades and the promise of a cure which is forever ‘just around the corner,’ cancer continues to increase? Why does modern medicine swear by chemical medicine while divorcing themselves from the natural world? Is there really no better and safer ways to deal with cancer than to radiate, burn, or surgically remove it?”
– Joe Martino, Founder of Collective-Evolution
The statistics on cancer are appalling. People today have nearly a 1 in 2 chance of developing cancer within their lifetime. The Truth About Cancer: A Global Quest, a 9 part docu-series, answers many questions regarding cancer and the cancer industry in general. It also explores effective alternative ways to prevent and treat this disease.
.
. . .
.
“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.”
– Dr. Marcia Angell, a physician and longtime Editor0in-Chief of The New England Medical Journal (NEMJ)
Source:
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...
.
. . .
Related article:
The Cancer Industry Exposed In Less Than 2000 Words:
www.collective-evolution.com...
.
I realize this is a . . . troublesome topic.
Nevertheless, I believe that honorable people must stand up and be counted about it. We must do what we reasonably can to insist on a more public dialogue about the crucially important issues.
May the depopulation goals and other related junky goals and actions be damned.
Thankfully, ATS has some good threads about alternative cancer cures. They are worth checking out. I've referred quite a number of loved ones to them.
It will be interesting to find out how long this good whistle blowing Doc will survive. He could probably use our prayers.
originally posted by: Cygnis
It's not "FREE HEALTHCARE", it's a single-payer healthcare funded by taxes... by you.
No such thing as a "free lunch".. (or free healthcare)
originally posted by: NautPsycho
This will explain it for me.
originally posted by: RetsuUnohana
From what i've noticed, treatments tend to get buried and later forgotten. Similar to how Ciclopirox (topical antifungal cream) was causing HIV infected cells to commit suicide by jamming up the cell's powerhouse a researchers stated. Since that was published, I have no heard of any updates and story has been buried or they stay in endless trails.
originally posted by: GreatWay
As a healer, I can assure you - cancer is very related to the inner state of the person.
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
There will never be a silver bullet cure for cancer.... I agree with the point about pharma companies, it's just that cancer doesn't work that way. Viral and bacterial infections most likely are that way....
Cancer is a mistake in the DNA of a cell that begins replicating. Making every strain different, and making a cure, nearly impossible.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Elementalist
I just told my wife what you said. She has cancer.
I can't tell you what she said as its against t&c.
Cancer is the replication of bad cells. Breathing and "happy thoughts" do diddly to DNA.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: BO XIAN
Yet there are measures to prolong life with cancer, new techniques to combat certain types of tumors and people are getting diagnosed earlier so it's more manageable meaning a longer life.
My wife's cancer (hereditary) meant an average life span of 40. Her father is 50 because of the NEW abilities of science to prolong life.
Yeah, it's about depopulation.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: TerryDon79
well chemo therapy seem to be ineffective with no real life extending benefits
naturalsociety.com...
www.chrisbeatcancer.com...
www.collective-evolution.com...
oops...dropped the ball....
www.emfacts.com...
You don't understand that there are very different types of cancer and each one reacts differently to different types of chemo, so success rates for one type of chemo for all cancers is a moot point as they're not designed to treat all cancers.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: TerryDon79
Look for a doctor who believed all cancer was a fungus and acidic. He lost his licence, killed 3 people, released a ton of books and still says it works.
And maybe he was on to something for one type of cancer. They now believe some heart attacks and brain and lung and other diseases are caused by parasites. There can be different causes for the same illness.
He was never on to something.
Cancer IS NOT a fungus.
Cancer IS cells mutating and replicating.
Seriously, biology 101 stuff.
originally posted by: Drocms
I work in pharmacy and I have to tell you, if the pharmaceutical companies come up with a chemo drug that has a 2 precent better outcome than next leading chemo drug they jump on it. That's why people who work in the medical field generally do not buy the "they have the cure" theory. Do you realize how much a cure would go for? Look up Harvoni. In 90 precent+ of hepatitis c patients it cures the disease. Over a course of three treatments they are cured, wanna guess how much it costs? It costs my pharmacy over 80 thousand dollars to buy the three bottles consisting of the entire treatment. You know what is even crazier? Insurance companies almost never reject it because it is cheaper over the long run (less hospitalizations). Trust me, if they had a cure it would be bottled and accessible to you... At a cost
originally posted by: ParasuvO
originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: BO XIAN
Yet there are measures to prolong life with cancer, new techniques to combat certain types of tumors and people are getting diagnosed earlier so it's more manageable meaning a longer life.
My wife's cancer (hereditary) meant an average life span of 40. Her father is 50 because of the NEW abilities of science to prolong life.
Yeah, it's about depopulation.
And all the treatments that others have tried and had success with are all hoaxes I suppose.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: TerryDon79
well chemo therapy seem to be ineffective with no real life extending benefits
naturalsociety.com...
www.chrisbeatcancer.com...
www.collective-evolution.com...
oops...dropped the ball....
www.emfacts.com...
You don't understand that there are very different types of cancer and each one reacts differently to different types of chemo, so success rates for one type of chemo for all cancers is a moot point as they're not designed to treat all cancers.
Ya, that explains then why they try it for ALL the different types , even when they know the outcome will be yay or nay.
They already know some of the whys and hows.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: TerryDon79
Look for a doctor who believed all cancer was a fungus and acidic. He lost his licence, killed 3 people, released a ton of books and still says it works.
And maybe he was on to something for one type of cancer. They now believe some heart attacks and brain and lung and other diseases are caused by parasites. There can be different causes for the same illness.
He was never on to something.
Cancer IS NOT a fungus.
Cancer IS cells mutating and replicating.
Seriously, biology 101 stuff.
Well, until they can PROVE WHY they are mutating and replicating, who cares.
There is a cause. Cells mutating is the cause. There is also an effect. The effect is cancer
It is like saying you have found the secret of the Universe and then tell everyone EVOLUTION, which deals with ZERO causes and only the effects.
See previous comment of cause and effect.
And then wonders why it takes FOREVER to reverse engineer something when you have NO idea how it even started.
BRILLIANT.