CLAIM: Cell towers across USA broadcast brain resonance freqs 2 disrupt human minds, ... DARPA ...

a reply to: ladyinwaiting

LOLOL.

I wonder how many significant rationalizations, even solid reasons our era now provides for justifying a schizophrenia sort of mentality. It has to be LOTS.

I still prefer more information to weigh and sort vs censorship.

a reply to: hellobruce

His RF info may have been dated.

It would be interesting to see him reply to your assertions.

a reply to: PeterMcFly

If you are saying that every point in the article is totally baseless,

I find that assertion without elaboration to be even more totally baseless.

originally posted by: and14263
I have always wondered why the manufacturers of these masts do not have their logo on them? Anything as prominent and widespread as these masts would a be brilliant brand awareness tool.

A quick goolge (look at more recent results) seems to show that most of the towers these days -- at least in the U.S. -- are owned by tower companies who lease space to the carriers. I guess that is why you don't see logos on them.

And depending on the area, the towers may be shared by more than one carrier.

Hope that helps.

It isn't the refrigerator, and all the television wants is to be heard, in every room,
using silent spread sound spectrum. To achieve this goal, even the lowest volume setting will generally suffice.

The elephant in the home happens to be your electrical lines, which are now pulsing out
transient spikes, which happen to trample a finely tuned brain. Most persons therefore do
not mind, or even notice, that their house is penetrated by multiple 120 volt 50,000 Hz antennae which
can both read, and scramble, the aura, as though it were an 'appliance'. All digital smart meters which I have been afflicted with use SMPS, and it's lethal. But only if that aspect of life matters to you. Cellphones also produce transient spikes, but at a lower power. I believe they are in it together. The end game is death of spirit. It works!

Pay attention. Listen to silence for 20 years. Then try to do this immediately after the 'smart' meter makes
it's stunning debut, and is welded by law, to your new cage. You will hear it.

a reply to: ladyinwaiting

# 627

a reply to: tothetenthpower

What do you make of this assertion:

The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies cell phone tower radiation as a "probable carcinogen."

???

a reply to: intrptr

This whistle blower is trying hard to disallow their keeping it quiet. Time will tell how confirmed or disconfirmed his assertions are.

CERTAINLY I wholesale agree with the rest of your post.

a reply to: TheWhiteKnight

Aside from woo science, let's say you are correct, and these transient spikes are penetrating our living spaces. How do you make the jump from that to "death of spirit?"

I am a creative. I make my living being creative, to various degrees, anyway. I live in the heart of the city, with power lines and cell towers and all that implies. My creativity and "spirit" seem just fine.

Anecdotal? Certainly, but far more compelling (to me, anyway) than the notion that "transient spikes" are destroying my spirit.

For me it was easy. I hear the surge protector/power conditioner clack as soon
as I feel an assault of digital scraping waves pierce my body and mind. I hear the electromagnetic field viciously alter. Typically, it happens
when I reach out to God, and that means letting my ectoplasm expand. I hear it each and every time.
Ain't I special?

So now I just cover my ears and clutch myself with my arms. When I start to 'breathe', I can hear the walls rumble along
where the nearest lines are canceling my work. A perpetual haircut for the soul. No wonder police escort
electrical workers out on their rounds these daze.
I will continue to try to think the way I think, until the meter explodes
and maybe a local transformer as well. And then some. I am highly motivated.
Sleep is impossible when the current draw is stable, and the smart meter
goes to work.

Thanks Obama. Thank you all.

a reply to: 0zzymand0s

# 628

a reply to: BO XIAN

Tenth . . . et al . . .

I have a major beef with this whole issue of websites that truly are or are falsely construed to be 'poor sources.'

My boss in my undergrad school at the University Library was fairly stern with me one day.

We were one of 2 universities, at the time, that collected in the Special Collections Dept that I was acting Director of--everything from the extreme left to the extreme right--pamphlets, fliers, posters, books, etc.

One day, when he was up to my dept, I was derisive about how flaky some of the groups were--a lot of them, actually.

He immediately said--'Now, now. Be careful in your derisiveness. In Germany in before Hitler's rise to power, it was the MOST FLAKY groups that FIRST and MOST ACCURATELY asserted what Hitler was, what his goals were, what he would become and do.

My boss had the worlds greatest collection of pre-Hitler pamphlets, broadsides, posters, leaflets etc. He knew what he was talking about as he was one of the world's best experts on the topic.

The world is not a tidy little boxed reality. Things are messy.

When things are hidden sufficiently; disguised; distorted . . . it may take many decades before the comprehensive facts are known remotely accurately.

Folks can suck-up to the false negative risks all they want. But the TRUTH is that THOSE risks can and often do bite one in the rear every bit as devastatingly as false positive risks.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: tothetenthpower

The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies cell phone tower radiation as a "probable carcinogen."

I never stated there was no cause for concern. What I was specifically referring to was the man's assertion of what frequencies your brain transmits at vs what's available out there in the form of technology.

He was wrong on one of his primary pieces of information, which is why I can't really take him seriously on anything else, without reading his specific research.

Is there merit to being weary of our body's being bombarded by different types of signals and frequencies, absolutely.

I'm not convinced however it's as big of a problem as this one would like me to believe, because of the lack of evidence and what looks like lack of basic knowledge about how this works.

~Tenth

a reply to: PeterMcFly

Thanks for an interesting point.

I'm not sure that the absorption issue is conclusive, however. Influences can occur without absorption, IIRC.

I pray this is not true. Why? Every single highschool and even some of the middle schools in my city are mounted up with cell towers. Literally every single one of them. They put the cell towers up on the buildings themselves occassionally but mainly they use the field stadium lights.

Go observe your own city please somebody. I would love to know if this is the norm other places. Because seriously, every single high school sports field in my city is just loaded up with cell towers on the "stadium" lights.

Also, in the past 10 years every single school has gained a really tall tower. I dont know what this one is. It is a tower usually twice as tall as the overhead lights and it comes to a narrow point at the top. There has literally been one of these put up at every school here.
I live in the suburbs. If you approach the suburbs from the North you will literally see about a dozen of these super tall towers. They stand literally almost a hundred feet above all the suburban homes that look the same. They stand out so much. Towering above the neighborhoods and spread out nicely.

Apologies for the frantic post. These towers I am mentioning have always freaked me the hell out. I would love to hear others thoughts.

I should add the tall slender towers went up at the schools first. The rumor between us kids was that they were meant to jam cell phone use. Well here we are now and right next to those tall towers will be cell towers mounted on overhead lights so the jammer theory makes no sense.

I could easily get pictures if anybody is interested enough. I am not exxagerating when i say these things are on every public school campus.

I really hope it is just a way cheap ass cell phone companies bribe the schools to let them use their lights as opposed to building their own actual cell towers.

a reply to: TheWhiteKnight

Fair enough.

You people have weird gods though. No offense.

I can't even imagine what it must be like to have to "reach out" to my god. God, to me, is a wellspring that pours into me from within, like an artesian well. It can't be intercepted or contaminated by anything external. The connection is intimate and absolute. There is literally zero separation.

To each their own though! Good luck with your problem!

a reply to: Iamnotadoctor

Because your criteria about a false negative risk is evidently a LOT more narrow than that of others, you think it should be moved to hoax.

I find that . . . more than a little problematic in a search for the widest possible discussion of possibilities and probabilities seeking truth about much of anything.

Sigh.

originally posted by: DaLlama
There is reason to believe there are signals being used across the cell infrastructure that could be used in mind control. There are also rumors of a new cell technology to replace actual towers with just localized equipment. Many conspiracy theories and myths could become a reality, including the so called "Enlightenment". Yet another sign of end times. However you perceive it happening, it could be an unwanted side effect of those evil-doers initiating it, making us more aware instead of less.

INDEED.

Certainly the technology exists to give people the impression that they are hearing the voice of God. Fairly specific sorts of dreams can be induced by technology. And other influences are more than possible. Some folks assert that such methodologies are 50 years ahead of what's publicly known.

originally posted by: 0zzymand0s
a reply to: TheWhiteKnight

Fair enough.

You people have weird gods though. No offense.

I can't even imagine what it must be like to have to "reach out" to my god. God, to me, is a wellspring that pours into me from within, like an artesian well. It can't be intercepted or contaminated by anything external. The connection is intimate and absolute. There is literally zero separation.

To each their own though! Good luck with your problem!

Yes they certainly do. Strange gods indeed.
Metaphysics isn't for everyone.
Jesus will save you all, just believe.

As above so below.

But it's not my problem.

Get it?

# 629

a reply to: Bhadhidar

Your post implies that such influences would be fairly heavy handed.

Usually, IIRC, the influences are subtle but persistent.

I don't think most folks would detect such an influence--even if they knew themselves fairly well.

a reply to: Hex1an

Looks like a solid article.

I'll try and read it all later.

I'm slightly familiar with the findings.

a reply to: TheWhiteKnight

Yeah, I read Crowley too. I think Philip K. Dick knew more about magic than he ever did.

But you described a problem.

I described an immunity.

Perhaps the wireless interference you are experiencing is an immune response to a parasitic connection with an other that only pretends at being a god? I suppose it doesn't really matter. That's certainty for you.