It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Drew Da General
im done with you i leave you with these 2 words that best describe you....anal retentive.
Originally posted by BasementAddix
You forget...in order to get a warrent...you need pretty credible info...and a DA/Judges approval...its not the cops just busting down doors at random...
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
That was old law mate. According to the anti-terrorism acts in US and UK, there is no need for a warrant to search citizens and no need for a triburnal to prosecute or jail. In the US the law is so bad, that you can be shot, without asking questions.
You still need a warrant for the average citizen....and no...if someone is shot...by LE...theres ALOT of questions...dont kid yourself...
Originally posted by BasementAddix
You forget...in order to get a warrent...you need pretty credible info...and a DA/Judges approval...its not the cops just busting down doors at random...
Originally posted by Yxboom
Originally posted by Amuk
Snip...
So again WHERE does it says drugs are illegal?
Obviously, the courts have upheld constitutional interpretations that allow the government to make drugs illegal on the basis that they can be harmful. Conversely, an illegal drug may be legal if it is legitimately prescribed by a doctor.
It's elementary.
In your opinion, who should have the legal authority to interpret the constitution for legal enforcement?
.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Originally posted by BasementAddix
You forget...in order to get a warrent...you need pretty credible info...and a DA/Judges approval...its not the cops just busting down doors at random...
That was old law mate. According to the anti-terrorism acts in US and UK, there is no need for a warrant to search citizens and no need for a triburnal to prosecute or jail. In the US the law is so bad, that you can be shot, without asking questions.
Originally posted by BasementAddix
YXboom...youre getting my "way above" vote...youre explaining things better then i probably ever could....
The old law is still applicable to state, county and city officers. Only Federal agents are exempt from obtaining a warrant -- and only if they can articulate that the terroristic threat is a national security risk. Otherwise, the Federal agents still need to get a warrant.
Besides, how many warrants have you seen executed???? And for what???? And how many times have you seen Federal agents kicking in front doors??? Probably never, eh?
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
The old law is still applicable to state, county and city officers. Only Federal agents are exempt from obtaining a warrant -- and only if they can articulate that the terroristic threat is a national security risk. Otherwise, the Federal agents still need to get a warrant.
The anti-terrorism laws render the old laws void when exercised. If a civillian is arrested, seached or hassled under the anti-terrorism act without a warrant - it is legal. I suggest you read the patriot act.
Originally posted by Indigo_Child
Besides, how many warrants have you seen executed???? And for what???? And how many times have you seen Federal agents kicking in front doors??? Probably never, eh?
Never? I've already mentioned several cases of this occuring. The links are bright red. Click on them. ]
Originally posted by Yxboom
By not answering the question, you answered it.
Thank you kindly, sister.
Originally posted by Drew Da General
I'm glad i started this post.i laugh at the above for he is trying to call me a liar.i'm going to kill 2 birds with 1 stone here(shot and yxboom).have you not read the other posts here in this thread?about 98% of the people in this thread have something negative to say about LE.have you not read the similar stories here?.