Boys, I think you are losing the point, while being overloaded with multiple details. I read with interest the various views including how the
(First of all, nobody can tell for sure whether this is the notorious Mark of the Beast, and why should it be a microchip and not a
tattoo for example. At the time of writing the Revelation the Tattoo would be the preferred choice. It is a pity the Lord didn't address it himself
in the Gospels. Why not, if that thing is considered so dangerous for the soul?)
Then, the microchip frankly is outdated, as much as the first computers from the smart phones. There are nanochips by now, invisible and attachable
from outside the skin. No one needs to implant anyone, in order to monitor you, as some posters noticed correctly.
Then we are in the dawn of the new biology and medicines that are about to heal based on DNA and other breakthrough principles. Those biological
agents that will be used, could very well be miniature nano scale robots, be they based on Carbon (our biology) or on Silicon (the computers) or
The idea that we should reject the new inventions that may prolong our lifespan, because it is all from the devil, is hard to be defended except for
the most conservative circles in every religion.
Overall, we need a complete new view on those problems, starting from better technological knowledge of what is being done in the moment not 20 years
ago, and ending with a better theological picture should we fear it, and if yes what exactly should we fear (as with the discussion of stem cell
research, or in previous generation - the artificial bones or other elements put inside human body).
It is easy to say, that is all NWO that will start surveillance over UK citizens to allow them medicare and to deny to the immigrants. It is difficult
to see the world as 7 bln INDIVIDUALS who have nearly the same human needs, and to make that conglomerate continue its future way without a major
conflict including nuclear. Neither UK nor USA are isolated islands anymore, as some of their leaders seem to behave if they were.
Pakistan is equally dangerous or even more dangerous than all those immigrants together. So is India, so is every nuclear state. The father of the
first atomic bomb Oppenheimer feared the first nuclear test in USA could trigger nuclear chain reaction of the atmospheric N2, and wrote to Truman
about that. Until now, such reaction was not achieved. However, such threshold do exist. Perhaps it is around the 100 megaton load, because the
Russian Tsar bomb was feared much in the West, persuading the Soviets not to do it. They scaled down to "only" 57 megaton. Each of today's nuclear
powers have as much combined load or more.
Hope that is not the future of humanity though. I say that to show how many more problems we have, including of feeding both our own populations and
those who immigrate, and those who live in their own countries such as Nigeria, to fear that someone makes surveillance on us. So what? The very
nature of computer systems assumes surveillance and spread of information to maximum people.
We need ASAP new ideology (not new religion) that will define those issues better and will draw new red lines. Including for the AI that could be much
more dangerous than a device always attached to your body. As some noticed correctly, the smartphone is already attached to your body quite
voluntarily, especially by our kids.
P.S. The idea that Mr Cameron will introduce the chipping of some sort shortly after the referendum on Brexit, is worth or considering, but frankly it
is not all about it, is it? I can list a dozen of scenarios, and the politicians can list several dozen more, of a nightmare coming to Europe or the
USA without the need of microchip.
Much more dangerous would be a religious war, that could ignite rather easily if terrorists repeat the same inside St Peter's. As both CIA and Trump
already warned. One can imagine what would happen if Mecca is destroyed in some end times scenario.
Another more mild non-armageddonic scenario is how Europe and Russia will deal from now on. If Europe starts chipping tomorrow, Russian leaders
including religious ones will say, see we are the ones to defend christian civilization from the beast of revelation, yes? The trick is to find a
common ground between different branches of one European civilization, as the West and Russia appear to be such. Here we go with pope Francis meeting
the Russian patriarch in Cuba, and after-tomorrow the patriarch of Constantinople on island Lesbos amid migrant crisis. They are not going to talk
things already said in MSM. They are going to talk what we are not told openly, not yet.
Of course, I share the concern of implanted microchip no less than you do. But the problem is really beyond that concern, may be including that
concern. We need ASAP new mentality if we are going to survive as species. Or some prefer we are not to do that, we are not to continue as
civilization but on the way of Armageddon. Only time will tell who got it right.
edit on 13-4-2016 by 2012newstart because: (no reason