It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

A Senator says 9/11 events “Had Support from Within the US” !!!

page: 6
82
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 11 2016 @ 06:14 PM
link   
a reply to: smurfy




That's a poor example, there are a heap of reasons why such an aircraft should have an attempted reconstruction, the Pentagon et al was a crime scene.

Very few aircraft's are reconstructed.
Only when the reason for the crash is in question.




posted on Apr, 11 2016 @ 08:39 PM
link   

originally posted by: MrBig2430



If it's red and liquid, it isn't steel. Most likely aluminum or lead.

And that block shown at the start of the video is silver. That means aluminum.

Black body radiation charts are proof of that so deny physics if you wish, that's your right....


Who mentioned, 'red and liquid' in the same breath? you chancer!
There is no block at the start of the video, but if you mean the still seen before you open the video, that is an aggregate of God knows what materials...as in pluralistic, as well as being stone cold.

Here's a steel nail heated by propane gas, at the top it is yellow, it is not molten when the picture was taken, wasn't intended to. Neither does the red parts in the picture I have posted look molten, nor were intended to however, the more yellow parts are ambiguous.


That is temperature on the/a black body, like a red glowing charcoal could be at the same temperature as the red part of the nail, and the colour will look the same, you are just pissing about by trying to introduce a melting point with a speciific colour, which I didn't in the pictures. Any melting was observed by those on the ground.
As for your Aluminium, it will be as near silver coloured at it's melting point as best most camera could pick up.


edit on 11-4-2016 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Apr, 11 2016 @ 08:54 PM
link   
he pointed his finger at the saudi's but I have always wondered about the bush/saudi connection



posted on Apr, 11 2016 @ 09:12 PM
link   
a reply to: Debunkology

Can you imagine the compartmentalization in the minds of those who can believe all the theories they have are true, and yet NONE of the footage or eyewitnesses or physics or ANYTHING backs up what they believe ??

Impressive programming indeed.



posted on Apr, 11 2016 @ 09:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: Zaphod58
Nm. I bow to the people t that obviously know more than me about military protocols and deployments. You're all right.


A whole lot of people in the military know more than you about protocols and deployments and they raged about this and STILL DO.

And most of them even have the courage to talk about it , and ask HOW, not defend the indefensible.

And incomprehensible,

Funny, Pearl Harbor, and 9/11, the only two times anyone has ever seen where the Air Force and Navy failed entirely ALL DAY LONG, to even try and defend America.



posted on Apr, 11 2016 @ 10:56 PM
link   
Is this new it was released in thr terrorist trials if you paid attention. Links to Saudi Arabia and even support from CAIR. The only thing new would be elements in the US government. But I suspect their involvement was in thr cover up afterwards such as flying out all those Saudis afterwards. And working really hard to not tell us where they got their financial support to pay for lessons and cars etc.



posted on Apr, 12 2016 @ 12:15 AM
link   
Of course they had...
Only a blind person wouldn't see the connections...
Actually many persons nowadays are blind and don't See the symbology behind it.
The twin Towers symbolized the two towers, yachin and boaz (kabbalah), of freemasonry and the Tower card of tarot (=torah).
Crushing them down symbolically meant turning down gods law (10 commandments, symbolizing 2 towers stones aswell)
to create their own... New World Order!



posted on Apr, 12 2016 @ 01:16 AM
link   
a reply to: Leominati

Oh yeah..
I forgot, that if you look at the twin Tower monuments and the New "one world" -trade Center it looks like the constellation orion, just like the pyramids.



posted on Apr, 12 2016 @ 08:08 AM
link   
a reply to: Leominati




I forgot, that if you look at the twin Tower monuments and the New "one world" -trade Center it looks like the constellation orion, just like the pyramids.

Say what ?
Orion has 7 main stars in a distinctive shape.
Care to show the pattern in buildings ?



posted on Apr, 12 2016 @ 09:10 AM
link   
a reply to: syrinx high priest

The Bush-Saudi connections are fairly well public knowledge. Hand-holding and kisses included. Business relations in Carlyle Group and other businesses included.



posted on Apr, 13 2016 @ 06:33 AM
link   





There is no block at the start of the video, but if you mean the still seen before you open the video, that is an aggregate of God knows what materials..




I say it's aluminum, but we both agree that at one point it was molten and liquid. I see steel - assuming it's rebar - sticking out of the block. It's rusted. That is a pretty good indicator that the chunk you call an aggregate wasn't steel, or it would be rusty too. Actually, it's a slam dunk that it's not steel.




As for your Aluminium, it will be as near silver coloured at it's melting point as best most camera could pick up.



Yes, and my point is that metals can be heated past their melting point, just like water.


edit on 13-4-2016 by MrBig2430 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2016 @ 07:55 AM
link   
a reply to: samkent

They are all messing with our minds. They have their occult thoughts going on fire 100s of years, but it is up to you if you want to believe it.
Here is some evidence that may convince you:
m.youtube.com...
m.youtube.com...
There are many other movies like Terminator or specifically Lord of the rings: the two towers that are about tearing towers down, most of them of the 20th Century.



posted on Apr, 13 2016 @ 09:28 AM
link   

originally posted by: Elementalist
a reply to: OtherSideOfTheCoin

I'm so curious why you've been in almost every 9/11 thread for years, using the same formula.

"Look here, not there, this is right, that doesn't matter".

That's the oldest trick in the book!

If.you don't mind, what compels you to continue sit down, open a Web browser, log in ats, go to 9/11 forums, and continue this, year after year?
Why does your version of 9/11 need to be repeated year in and year out?

Don't you get sick of the same argumentative, repetitive and lame discussions after so long? As if, you said your piece 100x, anyone can go find them, I'd not give anymore energy :/

Just curious


@OP - as others pointed out, he implies not states, that there could of been a COVER UP, not support as if they followed through the attacks.
They covered them up, as someone said, SA is an American customer and vice versa (military and oil), that relationship has a VERY wealthy exchange, a couple concrete towers wouldn't change that..

And so it is, here we are 2016 and they are still in bed


He never came back?

Shame, I was looking forward to understanding the insanity



posted on Apr, 14 2016 @ 07:43 AM
link   

originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
a reply to: DJW001

And what do you think he meant by this statement ?


Asked if the support was from government, rich people or charities, the former senator replies, “all of the above.”




That the hijackers had support from members of the Saudi Arabian[/i] government, and that the United States supported the Saudi Arabian government by covering up their involvement. Again, not an "inside job."



posted on Apr, 14 2016 @ 11:43 AM
link   
a reply to: DJW001

Now back to what he really said:


“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States


Yeah. Funny moments of cognitive dissonance where things can't be what they are, 'cause they simply can't. Cover up only, gotcha.
This Saudi-spin didn't save a thing btw, nice try. Where are our OT-bishops now, I'd like to hear the prayer again:

"15 years truther movement and yet no evidence for a cover-up!"




posted on Apr, 14 2016 @ 03:43 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion


Yeah. Funny moments of cognitive dissonance where things can't be what they are, 'cause they simply can't.


Yeah, isn't it weird how no-one but you can see the word "government" at the end of that quotation?



posted on Apr, 14 2016 @ 04:31 PM
link   
a reply to: DJW001


And who excised those pages from the 9/11 report, the Saudis?



...“The redaction of the twenty-eight pages has become a coverup by two Presidents, and coverup implies complicity,” Sharon Premoli, who is co-chair of 9/11 Families United for Justice Against Terrorism, said.

The Twenty-Eight Pages


You get the point, do you?



posted on Apr, 14 2016 @ 05:50 PM
link   
a reply to: PublicOpinion

So Sharon Premoli is really Bob Graham in drag? Just because she believes a cover-up implies complicity doesn't mean Graham intends that.



posted on Apr, 14 2016 @ 11:07 PM
link   
“Yes. The average intelligent watcher of 60 Minutes would recognize them instantly.”-John Lehman

Coming from a former member of the Kean/Zelikow Commission this is a major revelation Lehman was talking about Prince Bandar and other members of his family quite clearly to me.Then our old friend Omar Al-Bayoumi shows up bringing along a minor employee of Saudi Embassy named Fahad al-Thumairy a known radical who was later denied entry.I still don't buy into the "incompetence/mistake" theory.Remember the CIA supposedly lost track of Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar after the summit in Kuala Lumpur.The Agency and FBI didn't lose them and the others they looked the other way.



posted on Apr, 15 2016 @ 08:59 AM
link   
Omg this is already known



new topics

top topics



 
82
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join