It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama says Hillary Clinton’s emails never jeopardized America’s national security

page: 2
25
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   

originally posted by: misterhistory
a reply to: Gryphon66

I did answer your question, just because you don't like the answer doesn't mean I didn't answer it.


Saying "well they might either be morons or geniuses" is just not an answer.

How about I give you credit for a creative musing and we move on, eh?





posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:29 PM
link   
"Right" from a "Left Wing" source....


"We can confirm that later today, as part of our monthly FOIA productions of former Secretary Clinton's emails, the State Department will be denying in full seven email chains, found in 22 documents representing 37 pages. The documents are being upgraded at the request of the intelligence community because they contain a category of top secret information," State Department spokesman John Kirby said. "These documents were not marked classified at the time they were sent."


Well of course they weren't "marked".

Because nobody doing the reviewing saw the top secret info until long after the fact.




posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:30 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: Gryphon66

The more Hillary and Obama says and the louder they yell convinces me the guilt is there.



The end will justify the means.



Oh be honest for once, Xuenchen; you've been proclaiming Clinton's guilt since the early 90s if not before.

Let's at least be honest with each other about what we know to be true, K?



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
"These documents were not marked classified at the time they were sent."




Call the FBI Xuench ... you just proved that Clinton is innocent of the only thing that was even questionable.

You can't compromise Classified info if it wasn't, er, Classified at the time you used it, now can you?

You're due for a promotion in the Super Secret Investigators League I think, based on this one....




posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:33 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes it is an answer, did you not read that they are both at the same time by their own actions and words? Or am I on too much cold meds?



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Clinton is not losing in the primaries.


Actually she is, if it were not for the rigging.

The longer the FBI investigation drags out, the lower
the old lady in a pantsuit goes.

Which is why she is "losing it" and Obama goes
on TV wordsmithing.
edit on 10-4-2016 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:41 PM
link   

originally posted by: misterhistory
a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes it is an answer, did you not read that they are both at the same time by their own actions and words? Or am I on too much cold meds?


Being a moron and a genius at the same time is logically paradoxical ... or metaphorical (which is why I offered the "musing" credit.)

But that's not an answer to the question in any sense. The right-wing holds up Hillary and Obama as these horrible villians ... and yet, in the next breath, claims they're too stupid to know what they're saying on national TV on the mouthpiece network of their political opposition to MILLIONS of Americans.

President Obama knows there's nothing that's going to put Hillary Clinton in jail, as many of us have known since this started.

He said as much today.

I understand that some of you really really want to see Mrs Clinton incarcerated and so forth.

But the passionate want is not enough; she hasn't done anything wrong.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:43 PM
link   

originally posted by: burntheships

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Clinton is not losing in the primaries.


Actually she is, if it were not for the rigging.

The longer the FBI investigation drags out, the lower
the old lady in a pantsuit goes.

Which is why she is "losing it" and Obama goes
on TV wordsmithing.


Oh, of course.

When elections don't go the way you want, they're rigged, or there was voter fraud, or the machines lied.

SSDD

Clinton beats Sanders, Cruz and Trump by significant digits in all measures of American opinion.

Remember when you guys thought that dragging Bill through the dirt would hurt his public image?

He ended up with one of the highest Presidential approval ratings in modern times.

My advice to you and your fellows: Keep digging that hole.


+1 more 
posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

If Clinton and her aides have nothing to hide, why does it take a court order for her to turn over those emails? Why are her aides going to be questioned under oath for their part in it? Why did one of her top aides want immunity from prosecution for his testimony? If you haven't done anyhting wrong, why would you need immunity?
Clinton plays dumb, with her "I may have wiped it with a rag" BS and she's either too stupid to know what a secure server is, in which case she should not be in charge of secret communications, or she's just trying to play the "lil ol' me" BS.
Either way, it's BS.
Clinton is toxic and has proven time after time, that she will trade favors for "contributions" to her foundation. She uses a white noise generator to block unwanted listeners to her fundraisers, because she changes her story to fit the crowd. Money and power are her ultimate goals and she will do what ever it takes to obtain them.
Make fun of "Righties" all you like, at least we have the common sense not to fall for her lies and manipulation.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:47 PM
link   
S&f...I just flagged this to watch someone defend Clinton.

-wow

Did she not just lose 500 tax billion dollars? Or was that trillion?

Or should we discuss emails?






posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66

Call the FBI Xuench ... you just proved that Clinton is innocent of the only thing that was even questionable.

You can't compromise Classified info if it wasn't, er, Classified at the time you used it, now can you?

You're due for a promotion in the Super Secret Investigators League I think, based on this one....



Yeah.....well, I'm not ready to send the Super Secret Investigator League
decoder ring, though. And I've called dibs on SSIL Decoder Ring distribution. There will be testing.


edit on 4/10/2016 by BuzzyWigs because: Because. Testing.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: DAVID64

Scientifically, I would say that it is because Clinton is SO dirty, she makes Rightguard turn left.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Gryphon66


When elections don't go the way you want, they're rigged, or there was voter fraud, or the machines lied.


I was quoting The Democrats that have admitted it is.
And I was speaking of the primaries, doubt she can win the general
election, no one likes her except her fellow criminals and cronies.





Clinton beats Sanders, Cruz and Trump by significant digits in all measures of American opinion.


Nope. She is thought of as the most "dishonest" of all.
And that rating keeps going up.

Why is that?



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: DAVID64

In rough order of your spiel ...

1. Which emails?

2. Because the FBI is conducting an investigation and witnesses ... er ... testify under oath?

3. Because he's an American with such rights under the Fifth Amendment and uses them as he sees fit?

4. Because the government tends to find things wrong when they look for them (remember the Big Bad Ebil Government? Booga booga!)

5. Yes, yes, Hillary is a dumb, stupid, genius criminal mastermind ... I see you have the same affliction others have.

6. Wow, you think what Clinton says is "BS" ... that is a shocker.

7. Yada yada "I hate Hillary Clinton." covers the rest of your schtick, except for ...

8. I don't usually make fun of Righties ... but you and others have routinely admitted that is doesn't matter what investigations determine, even thirteen or fourteen investigations into THE SAME THINGS that still show every time that CLINTON DID NOTHING WRONG ... and you call that common sense. Pardon me, I'm going to end the post before I poke more fun at the utter ridiculousness of that claim.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: burntheships

You haven't quoted anything. You've stated something vague and unsubstantiated.

You seem to be conflating your personal opinion onto the American people at large ... do you have any evidence for your claims?



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Okay. I'll admit to playing a right wing nut here. Personally I believe they're are geniuses. But they do give credit to be morons by denying when things get leaked about something going wrong. They're feeding the right with both sides.

Just because the President said she's innocent doesn't mean she actually is. Remember Nixon said he wasn't a criminal? But innocent till proven guilty, she did break the law but law is trying to figure out if they have enough to take her down. I don't think they have it or she would be out of the running already.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:55 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Now Buzzy, you know you and I are in the He-Woman Man-Lover's Club ... we use different rings than the SSIL does, LOL.

Besides, we're communists/socialists/fascists/Marxist/Istists ... they don't let our kind in de club.

LOLOL.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:56 PM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66


Clinton beats Sanders, Cruz and Trump by significant digits in all measures of American opinion.

Hey there, my friend Gryph......

I know that individual states have her with predictable margins, but reality it turning out to defy even Nate Silver's best educated guess. Bernie is winning. Just because the press hasn't got their footing around that yet does not change it.

The opposition is mustering under the radar in plain sight. That's why he's doing so well - the millennial voters don't count on MSM........

You GO, kids!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Bring the Bern! We have to hand-off the flaming baton now - it's you......



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 02:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: misterhistory
a reply to: Gryphon66

Okay. I'll admit to playing a right wing nut here. Personally I believe they're are geniuses. But they do give credit to be morons by denying when things get leaked about something going wrong. They're feeding the right with both sides.

Just because the President said she's innocent doesn't mean she actually is. Remember Nixon said he wasn't a criminal? But innocent till proven guilty, she did break the law but law is trying to figure out if they have enough to take her down. I don't think they have it or she would be out of the running already.


Don't call yourself a nut ... you seem fairly level-headed to me, regardless of the cold medicine ... LOL.

No, the President saying Clinton is innocent would not make her innocent. And pointedly, that's not what he said.

How do you know she "broke the law"? Don't answer me, just ask yourself the question.

Did it come from listening to Fox News, Rush, Hannity, Beck and/or reading the downstream productions of right-wing blogs?

Just consider: What law did she break? How do you "know" she broke it? Where did that belief come from?

I think you'll have a significant answer if you're honest with yourself.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 03:00 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

LOL ... I know you're a Bernie supporter Buzzy.

I won't do anything to take that away from you here.



new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join