It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Earth Is Tipping Because of Climate Change

page: 2
14
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 12:02 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

Btw: Thanks! It's nice to hear I'm 100% right... I'll caveat it with: I'm most likely not 100% right. "Close enough" works for me, though!

edit on 4/10/2016 by japhrimu because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 12:03 AM
link   
a reply to: japhrimu

I think it does have an equilibrium, how else would it maintain its axis?

Seems to me like water really does have something to do with it and water takes the form of its container so...



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 12:05 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

"Unless..." Other than that unless, I totally agree with you 100%, too! Lol



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 12:13 AM
link   

originally posted by: japhrimu
a reply to: onequestion

"Unless..." Other than that unless, I totally agree with you 100%, too! Lol


This totally debunks sea level rise to me as well.

It would seem that it may rise in some places and go down in others in order to maintain equilibrium meaning sea level rise can't exist everywhere but only in specific areas.

They are spreading total bs like all the climate change people.
edit on 4/10/2016 by onequestion because: (no reason given)

edit on 4/10/2016 by onequestion because: (no reason given)


If I could run an experiment on this is would try to replicate centrifical force on an outer skin shaped similar to the land mass of earth floating on whatever density magma is and see how the water moves around each with the crust moving up and down in different areas.


I could see massive flooding happening.
edit on 4/10/2016 by onequestion because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 12:22 AM
link   
a reply to: DBCowboy



Let's correct the Earth!

On three, everyone lean to your left.

One. . . . .two. . . . .



Now now.

Don't be doing something you'll later regret.

Leaning to the left might cause you to have an allergic reaction and break out in hives all over your body.



*cough*




posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 12:53 AM
link   
What a group of loser so-called scientists. They are correct in the shifting of the poles. However , it is the magnetic poles which do this all the time.Sounds like one of those the physical poles are shifting and the earth will turn over on its side in the blink of an eye one day group, They cant tell their poles from a hole in the ground...(pun intended , or not)
Ridiculous.....



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 12:55 AM
link   
1) The Earth's tilt is not changing due to mass redistribution. It requires external influences to do that. The tilt (about 23.5º relative to the ecliptic) remains pretty much the same over periods of many thousands of years. What changes is the location of the north pole, a tiny amount. This happens on a ongoing basis because of changes in the distribution of mass on the Earth's crust.

2) This is not really very new information.
www.scientificamerican.com...


a reply to: Gothmog

They are correct in the shifting of the poles. However , it is the magnetic poles which do this all the time.
Yes, the magnetic poles do wander. So do the rotational poles. Much less so than the magnetic poles, by a matter of centimeters over time.

edit on 4/10/2016 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 01:38 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage



Yes, the magnetic poles do wander. So do the rotational poles. Much less so than the magnetic poles, by a matter of centimeters over time.


Wow really That fast?
or that slow... Because centimeters over time really don't say anything...




posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 01:45 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent

From 1982 to 2005, the pole drifted southeast toward northern Labrador, Canada, at a rate of about 2 milliarcseconds —or roughly 6 centimetres — per year. But in 2005, the pole changed course and began galloping east toward Greenland at a rate of more than 7 milliarcseconds per year.

www.scientificamerican.com...



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 01:48 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

you know I was just enjoying your mistake, made me feel phage like for a second, a second like a time unit you missed in that sentence





posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 01:49 AM
link   
a reply to: Indigent

You're right. My statement actually was meaningless as written.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 01:51 AM
link   
a reply to: Phage

You always have to find a way to make me feel like crap don't ya




posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 03:43 AM
link   
a reply to: lostbook

The Earth will tip over onto its side...in about a billion years when the Moon has drifted sufficiently away from it that it no longer has the gravitational influence to stabilise it.

The side facing the Sun will be a tortured hell hole; the side facing away will be permanently covered in snow and ice.

At around the same time, the Sun will begin to die; it will get smaller, brighter, and hotter.

We've got about a billion years, give or take.

If mankind hasn't colonised Mars by then, it's finished.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: CJCrawley

A colonization on another planet.

Eventually something will go wrong right?



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 03:50 AM
link   
a reply to: onequestion

Yes. We'll have several million years breathing space but, eventually, even Mars will become too hot, and mankind will have to move again if it is going to continue.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 03:51 AM
link   
a reply to: CJCrawley

In a billions years we will be a distant past and we will have transformed ourselves into something else.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 05:01 AM
link   
The tale of 2 magnetic spheres: the Sun and the Earth.

As the interactive magnetic field of the Earth shifts and/or the magnetic field of the Sun shifts, the positioning of the lower mass object (Earth) will be altered. This includes the rotational axis of the Earth to Sun positioning. Constant climate change is assured as both magnetic sources (Earth and Sun) have swirling magnetic fields.



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 05:43 AM
link   
a reply to: semperfortis

So no polar ice retreat means no global warming . The thing is that if the polar ice caps average temperature rose by 1 , 2 , 5 degrees they would still be well under freezing point .



Antarctica is the coldest, windiest and driest continent on Earth. The average annual temperature ranges from about −10°C on the Antarctic coast to −60°C at the highest parts of the interior. Near the coast the temperature can exceed +10°C at times in summer and fall to below −40°C in winter.Jun 25, 2002


The article named Greenland . What does NASA say about greenlands ice .



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 05:45 AM
link   
Sometime since 2004 I posted a reply along the lines of the Earth Axis tilt...

we are all aware that the Earth's Axis tilt is presently around 23.5 degrees, a condition which causes our annual seasons to occur.

here is an obscure mental exercise about the axis tilt...
the normal 23.5 degree tilt is also equivalent to being 66.5 degrees from the Perpendicular of 90 °


If the Earth tilt was somehow altered (from asteroid hit, 10.0 Earthquake, plate shift...) to a new axis tilt of 23.4°....that tiny .1 degree difference would mathematically put the tilt at 66.6 off the Perpendicular (which is the anti-christ number)...

Wow ~~ that would be very weird, huh



posted on Apr, 10 2016 @ 08:11 AM
link   
Their purpose is in their solution. Tax the h**l out of carbon fuels and everything will be just fine. Now give me your money!!
edit on 10-4-2016 by craterman because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
14
<< 1    3  4 >>

log in

join