It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Hillary Clinton Declares ‘Not Even Remotest Chance’ She’ll Be Charged in Email Scandal

page: 6
31
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 10:01 AM
link   
Can anyone provide a source stating this is just a "security review" by anyone other than hillary and her campaign?

Here is a report saying it is a criminal investigation...

www.washingtonpost.com... affer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html

"https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-clinton-email-investigation-justice-department-grants-immunity-to-former-state-department-s taffer/2016/03/02/e421e39e-e0a0-11e5-9c36-e1902f6b6571_story.html"
link won't work in post

Even Comey refers to it as an investigation, not a review.

edition.cnn.com...

Can anyone explain why 147 FBI agents, led by Charles Kable, special agent in charge of the Counterintelligence Division who "most recently served as the chief of the Counterespionage Section at FBI Headquarters (FBIHQ) in Washington, D.C. In this capacity, Mr. Kable provided leadership and oversight to the field offices engaged in espionage, economic espionage, and insider threat investigations" is pursuing a "security review?" The FBI is a criminal investigation bureau, not an IT review company.

www.fbi.gov... ield-office

"https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/press-releases/charles-h.-kable-iv-named-special-agent-in-charge-of-counterintelligence-division-of-the-washington- field-office"
link won't work in post

Can anyone explain why the AG herself told the WH to remain silent during an "investigation"...not a "security review?"

www.wsj.com...

Does anyone actually believe that this is a "security review?" People actually believe what comes out of her mouth now?

Here is a nice 13 min video of hillary being a liar, in her own words.

www.youtube.com...

I do think that she is probably too big to jail, but a headline saying "Indicted!!!" couldn't happen to better, more deserving person than hillary.



edit on 9-4-2016 by gator2001 because: fix link

edit on 9-4-2016 by gator2001 because: (no reason given)




posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 10:25 AM
link   
a reply to: gator2001

Why bother with pretending to look for facts?

You believe that Clinton is a liar; you can just say that.

No need for the drama.

The fact is that the FBI has repeatedly said that the investigation regards the server.

The fact is that he FBI has NEVER said that Clinton is "a subject of interest."

The fact is that there is nothing to this point to suggest that Clinton's use of a private server was illegal.

The fact is that there is nothing to suggest that Clinton will be accused or convicted of anything ... not because she's so "all -= powerful, but because she did nothing illegal.



edit on 9-4-2016 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 10:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Gryphon66

Hhmm...the guy who always demands facts get some, and now responds with "Why bother with pretending to look for facts?"

Such hypocrisy from you. Nice job of not answering my questions, too.

Anyways, I was talking to everyone, not you.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 12:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: gator2001
a reply to: Gryphon66

Hhmm...the guy who always demands facts get some, and now responds with "Why bother with pretending to look for facts?"

Such hypocrisy from you. Nice job of not answering my questions, too.

Anyways, I was talking to everyone, not you.


You may want to look up the meaning of "rhetorical" for your future edification.

Also, "hypocritical," as it does NOT mean "someone didn't answer my loaded questions the way I wanted them to. Waah."

LOL.

edit on 9-4-2016 by Gryphon66 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 12:18 PM
link   
Hopefully she'll be tried, convicted and be given a lengthy sentence.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 12:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: Ohanka
Hopefully she'll be tried, convicted and be given a lengthy sentence.


For what crime?

Being "a Clinton"?



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 12:29 PM
link   
Nothing will happen to her, she's arrogant about because she knows they're not going to touch her. She is the chosen one for wall street



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 12:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: supremecommander
Nothing will happen to her, she's arrogant about because she knows they're not going to touch her. She is the chosen one for wall street


Can you tell us just who on "Wall Street" has chosen Clinton?

Thank you kindly.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 01:33 PM
link   
a reply to: NewzNose

Since she didn't commit any crime I guess if I did it I'd be ok too. No solitary. Sorry to disappoint you.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 01:38 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Is that pronounced like goose. Goose a fur??? Or Gus. Gus a fur???



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 01:40 PM
link   
You guys are wasting your time.

This is no longer about facts and proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This is about a religious-like affliction that demands pure hatred for people, even if they are not guilty of anything.

The Church of Anti-Hillary.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 01:42 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

There's Fox's favorite whistle blower informant snitch the ever present intelligence source close to the case. That guy sure has a lot to say. Meanwhile back at the farm... the actual intelligence close to the case has not made a single statement.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 01:44 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

That's silly.
edit on 492016 by Sillyolme because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 01:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

As if any name you give me matters right?



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 01:46 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Only if she actually did something wrong. But you don't know any more than I do. I do know she doesn't sound a bit concerned.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 01:51 PM
link   
a reply to: pl3bscheese

What does that have to do with anything?



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 02:02 PM
link   
a reply to: gator2001

thehill.com...


www.politifact.com...


I'm pretty sure these didn't come from Hillary's camp.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 02:06 PM
link   
a reply to: gator2001

And it's an investigation.




Of her server.



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 02:11 PM
link   
a reply to: Metallicus

Wonder why they distorted the phrase "private email server".... Rather poorly I might add...



posted on Apr, 9 2016 @ 02:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: Sillyolme

And it's an investigation.

Of her server.


I can see the future headlines....

Hillary's server indicted !!!!

Hillary's server found guilty !!!!

Hillary's server sentenced to 20 years hard labor to be served in a Federal facility !!!!





top topics



 
31
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join