It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BlueAjah
a reply to: Bramble Iceshimmer
Agreed - that too.
The negative spin on ads and in the media, with Trump getting attacked from all sides, is outrageous. They are twisting things and driving people to hate him without intelligent reasoning.
Tonight there was an African American on a news show (don't remember his name), and he was blasting Trump, loudly and obnoxiously, calling him a racist. He has some kind of radio show where he is repeating this non-stop. Bill O'Reilly asked him repeatedly for one quote from Trump that showed he was racist. The guy evaded, and yelled over him - and could not come up with a single quote. And O'Reilly calmly told him that in all the years he has known Trump, he has never heard him say a single disparaging remark about a group based on race. O'Reilly tried to once again show that the racist label was falsely spread because Trump wanted to protect the country from illegal immigration and terrorism - having nothing to do with race.
The lies being spread by the media and others are infuriating.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: tadaman
This is a blatant steal.
Who the hell supported cruz? No one. A minority.
It should have been Trump. The sham continues.
Start a new party or run solo.
This is complete BS.
Its not even realistic.
GOP and DNC are my enemies from now until I die.
All th enews organizations keep calling WI a winner take all state. not exacly true. the winner gets twelve. the winner of 8 districts gets 8 the last bit get th e remaining delegates. But yes i t looks like cruz got his buddy walker to fix this one fo r him. Trump won th e smaller places in WI bu t cruz go t the cities.
originally posted by: Granite
a reply to: xuenchen
Where are our Sanders suppoters...have they faded away so soon?
I thought they would last longer than three months!!
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Dear lord no. My pocketbook cannot handle a Bernie presidency. We would go bankrupt. It doesn't matter that we would hypothetically be receiving free stuff. It wouldn't compensate us for all we'd lose in taxes out of our income.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Yeah, I still don't see your point with regard to my 'prediction
You mean clearly IGNORING two polls in both New York and California where Clinton is leading Sanders.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: neo96
I'm not sure how that refutes what I think is going on, but ok.
The HuF Po is Soros and media matters financed.
Meaning LEFT WING as it gets.
Yeah, I still don't see your point with regard to my 'prediction.'
I don't believe that Soros or the media are ever going to hint that Bernie is eyed favorably by the 'Establishment.' Not in this political climate. No way.
What they will do is try to mislead voters.
Soros is financing Clinton. Therefore all his groups are behind Hillary. To see who the Democratic candidate will be , all you have to do is look at who George is putting his money on...that fact goes back to Bill at least (if not further)
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I don't know about the establishment but I know lots of private citizens. My friends have been going to Bernie rallies who never attended political events before. I'm pretty sure it is their own decision to support Bernie.
Biggest spending plan + biggest tax hike to grow the biggest government = The Chosen One.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I think you have a misconception about why Bernie is supported. No one believes he can accomplish anything with current congress. We are hanging on to the hope there will be a more working House and Senate voted in. If not, then all we can hope is that Bernie will preserve our rights like ACA and women's reproductive rights. With the current congress it will be chasing its tail again and the president will be chasing his/her tail with vetoes.
originally posted by: interupt42
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Yep , she is a very slimy team player made out of Vaseline coated teflon . Just the way they like the chosen one to be ,when they stick it further into the majority of Americans.
originally posted by: interupt42
IMO Her taking the fall in 08 was part of the deal for her nomination on 2016.
originally posted by: interupt42
Hence IMO the chosen one is Hillary who has a history of playing and focusing on the right agenda and loves Obamacare.
originally posted by: MOMof3
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Your theory of the establishment's total control is way out there, but plausible. This is mine, cause of what I see. Historically, young people have not paid much attention to national elections and just about 0 to local ones. The marijuana, abortion isssues with local laws have changed that consciousness. I can see big changes coming and republicans should find a way to cash in on that demographic with no racial identity and stigmas.
The state I am moving to shortly, Idaho. The 65+ population has grown in percentage, the younger has decreased. That is why property taxes are high in Idaho, no good jobs for the income tax. The younger are leaving except mormons.
I don't thin the establishment can control demographics. Gerrymandering will become an extinct method of winning an election.
originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: MotherMayEye
I'm pretty sure the establishment and congress want Hillary. Those pre-pledged super delegates says a lot about who they want.