It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Annee
Oh you mean like Melissa Harris Perry and her stupid earrings?
I suppose they could be chanting Hail Satan!
And if no one cows to that, perhaps throwing some jars of the poop and pee in question will get their point across? They've thought about it at various protests before and it has a grand tradition all around the world.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Annee
Oh you mean like Melissa Harris Perry and her stupid earrings?
I suppose they could be chanting Hail Satan!
And if no one cows to that, perhaps throwing some jars of the poop and pee in question will get their point across? They've thought about it at various protests before and it has a grand tradition all around the world.
originally posted by: Generation9
Don't trust your parents. Don't trust your religion. Don't trust your pants.
A remarkable number of ‘bathroom bills’ have cropped up in state legislatures in 2016: so far 44 anti-trans bills have been introduced in 16 states. In all of these contexts, strategists rely on a bigoted myth that sexual predators pretend to be trans women to gain access to women’s bathrooms to invade, harass and rape them. This myth is based on bigots’ party line, which we unequivocally reject: that trans women are not “real” women but instead dangerous men.
These untruths endure in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary. There are no documented cases like that Senator Berger describes. Instead, trans women are the ones at tremendous risk for sexual victimization. Just this weekend, in the wake of H.B.2.’s passage, a trans woman was raped in the bathroom at New York’s Stonewall Inn. Trans women forced by laws like North Carolina’s to use men’s bathrooms are often met with violence and harassment.
While “bathroom bills” put more women at risk, their proponents’ pretend they advocate for them to protect us. Now, more than ever, women need to make sure state legislatures hear loud and clear that we refuse to be used as props to support transphobic and bigoted bills that hurt our trans sisters and deflect energy from real work to end gender violence. This is a feminist issue that requires our anger and our advocacy.
originally posted by: Freija
a reply to: Bluesma
The issue isn't having men in the woman's bathroom unless you are talking about transgender men. The issue is having transgender women in the women's bathroom.
Because some of us sane folks don't want pedos to decide they identify as a woman today so they can peep on young girls?
originally posted by: Generation9
a reply to: dawnstar
Uh, oh. 400. FOUR HUNDRED liberal activist jobs! Ha ha. That is laughable.
Now we've got activist mainstream media, activist judges and activist corporations trying to tell Americans how to live their lives. Don't trust your parents. Don't trust your religion. Don't trust your pants.
originally posted by: Bluesma
I was referring to this ----
"Because some of us sane folks don't want pedos to decide they identify as a woman today so they can peep on young girls"
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: kaylaluv
Yet there is a real danger where kids undress in front of adults attracted to their gender for them to be molested.
I will not let a man be alone with my daughter in the bathroom. If she is, I will tell her to treat him like a rapist and F him up. Maybe he can cry about gender violence after. I wonder how often that happens for this simple reason.
No one is risking themselves over this mess.
Sorry. Common sense and the real world.
Show an example of this being a widespread problem, and then maybe you'll have a point. Right now, you appear to be heavily speculating based on fear and ignorance though.
first, show the unavailability of bathrooms to be a widespread problem.
Will you spend the extra $15000 to renovate your business and build a bathroom for the 1% of people who are transgender and somehow cannot deal with bathrooms the way they have been for the last 80 years?
Perhaps there can be a government subsidy for this, paid for by those rich folk.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: kaylaluv
Yet there is a real danger where kids undress in front of adults attracted to their gender for them to be molested.
I will not let a man be alone with my daughter in the bathroom. If she is, I will tell her to treat him like a rapist and F him up. Maybe he can cry about gender violence after. I wonder how often that happens for this simple reason.
No one is risking themselves over this mess.
Sorry. Common sense and the real world.
Show an example of this being a widespread problem, and then maybe you'll have a point. Right now, you appear to be heavily speculating based on fear and ignorance though.
first, show the unavailability of bathrooms to be a widespread problem.
Will you spend the extra $15000 to renovate your business and build a bathroom for the 1% of people who are transgender and somehow cannot deal with bathrooms the way they have been for the last 80 years?
Perhaps there can be a government subsidy for this, paid for by those rich folk.
Then maybe just stop asking questions about who is using what bathroom. And let the people decide. If a transgender person feels safer in a the newly assigned sex they are, then let them go in that bathroom. The stalls provide privacy anyways.
originally posted by: RedCairo
Freija: thank you for your many informative posts. I know zip about this topic so they are helpful for context and edu.
Off-topic: totally and I'm sorry but one of your posts with all the schoolgirl pics brought it up: how does a small child / young girl get 'transgendered'? Honestly six year olds don't make a decision followed by surgery do they? Or is it merely that the child feels like a girl, generally looks like a girl (hopefully or she's in for some real social grief), dresses and hangs with the girls and so is considered such?
(I don't mean to be insensitive. One of the most difficult things with controversial topics like this is that people uninvolved but well intentioned don't know the right terms or even the right fundamentals and tend to accidentally cause offense in the sometimes hypersensitive sorts on the other side.)
Maybe I'm wrong about that. But if as noted there's already higher laws contradicting this, then it's little more than political grandstanding and sure to be overturned. I suppose the larger concern in a way is the precedent, even if it doesn't stand, and is in the insight it gives into what culturally we are reacting to as a larger population.
Maybe "voting with your wallet" as a business or individual is the best way of influencing anything in a semi-capitalist country and we should let that be the solution -- but that seems a bit unfair since it means a real solution would end up 60 years away and I'm pretty sure everyone living now and in the next decades would prefer a sane environment sooner.
As far as 'public' businesses with a retail location go, I do feel they should be legislated by government, and I do feel government should be fundamentally as "unbiased" as possible -- basically, agnostic in every way that word can be applied. So a public bakery should not have the right to not make a cake for gays, for example.
But if they're a preacher for a church with a belief system against gay marriage I think they should have the right to not-marry someone.
Of course the law in this thread does the worst, not the best. In a perfect world people use whatever bathroom they most match (dress like generally) and if someone were uncomfortable with them and said so they'd leave and use the other. I would never want anybody to be harrassed, humiliated or assaulted for any reason, let alone something incredibly stupid like "you look too feminine to be a man" or "you look too masculine to be a woman." I thought our culture had (alas) decided to collectively hate fat people since we aren't allowed to hate anybody else officially (that's a corporatism thing, the fat thing, nobody seems to realize), but now I realize there actually isn't any prohibition on bias against the LGBTQOhowmanylettersdoesthisacronymhaveanyway -- I hadn't realized.