posted on Apr, 1 2005 @ 06:52 PM
This was originally brought up by Realist05 way back in January. Sandy Burgler has now admitted to destroying documents, most likely to protect
Clinton. He is only recieving a $10,000 fine and revocation of his Top Secret Clearence for 3 years.
This is a Watergate type offense, but because it was done by a Democrat, let's just slap him on the wrist?
Rush has best take on the issue...as always!
RUSH: It's a great April Fool's joke. Sandy Burglar admits, ladies and gentlemen, to taking documents out of the National Archives three to four
different occasions and is going to get a $10,000 fine and loose his security clearance for three years.
Another good article...
The document, written by former National Security Council terrorism expert Richard Clarke, was prepared in early 2000 detailing the administration's
actions to thwart terrorist attacks during the millennium celebration. It contained considerable discussion about the administration's awareness of
the rising threat of attacks on U.S. soil.
Berger was reviewing materials as a representative of the Clinton administration to the national commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001,
terrorist attacks. The question of what Clinton knew and did about the emerging al-Qaida threat before leaving office in January 2001 was acutely
sensitive, as suggested by Berger's poring over the Clarke report before his testimony.
If Condi Rice or anyone in the Bush Administration did anything like this, what would the response be, from liberals, democrats, the media?
It wouldn't be just a slap on the wrist like Sandy Burgler is getting.